Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Sharon Shoesmith was Director of Children's Services for Haringey in 2007 at the time of the death of Peter Connelly, also known as 'Baby P'.
In Learning from Baby P, she carries out a dispassionate analysis of the events which followed Peter Connelly's death, documenting the responses of the media, politicians and the public. She explores the psychological and emotional responses we share when faced with such horrifying cases of familial child homicide, and how a climate of fear and blame which follows such tragedies can lead to negative consequences for other children at risk of harm, and for the social workers striving to protect them.
Learning from Baby P is a thought-provoking book which aims to deepen understanding and shed light on the difficult relationship between politics, the media and child protection.
At the heart of this formidable, authoritative book is a forensic account of a modern day political witch hunt.
Patrick Butler, Social Policy Editor, The Guardian
The emotional, financial and reputational impact on Sharon Shoesmith and on the other workers who lost their jobs as a result of Baby Peter's death is graphically described, but so too is the careful examination of society's wish in effect to sanitise familial child homicide. It is easier to publicly blame and humiliate workers (who were working to protect children) than it is to accept that a mother has either caused or allowed her child to die.
Andrea Morris, Locality Director, Children’s Services, Devon County Council
Research, Policy and Planning
A detailed and thoroughly engrossing read which succeeds in extending our understanding of the case of Peter Connelly and, more particularly, the socio-emotional, political and media responses to his tragic death and the 'scandal' which was to unfold. Should be read by everyone with an interest in child abuse and how we can begin to seriously address the challenges involved in improving child protection policy and practice.
Nigel Parton, Professor in Applied Childhood Studies, University of Huddersfield, England
This is a very serious and important work of professional and academic scholarship. Sharon Shoesmith is in no way pursuing a personal agenda. Rather, through rigorous and evidence based analysis she discloses the cultural and social conditions that allowed, and still allow, social workers to shoulder the blame for events that actually require sophisticated and thoughtful understanding if we are to learn from the tragedy of Peter Connelly's death. An essential resource for our profession in the struggle to promote and defend the role of social work in modern child welfare and protection.
Andrew Cooper, Professor of Social Work, The Tavistock Centre and University of East London
A cogent, compelling analysis of the blame culture in social work. Essential reading for anyone wishing to understand, reflect and learn from the responses to the high profile familial homicide of Peter Connelly.
Ruth Smith, Publisher, Community Care
Sharon Shoesmith has worked with children for almost 40 years in a career which culminated with her role as Director of Children's Services in the London Borough of Haringey, having previously been one of Her Majesty's Inspectors. She now works as a researcher, writer and public speaker in areas related to education, social care and public perception. Sharon also works as a volunteer with Macmillan Cancer Care at University College Hospital. She completed a PhD in 2015 at the University of London, Birkbeck College.
This is a book which is informed by the head and the heart. It explores what underlay and drove the media and political frenzy of the 'Baby P story', which unjustly and wrongly blamed and vilified Shoesmith and her colleagues and undermined and distorted child protection and social work. Of great relevance to all who work with children and families, hopefully it will be read widely and lessons will be learned by the press and politicians who wielded power without wisdom or integrity.
Ray Jones, Professor of Social Work, Kingston University and St George's, University of London
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Learning from Baby P - The Politics of blame, fear and denial by Sharon Shoesmith | 3 | ||
Preface\n | 11 | ||
Introduction | 13 | ||
Responses to the news of Baby P’s death | 15 | ||
The impact of Peter Connelly’s death on children’s social care | 18 | ||
The context of this book | 19 | ||
The approach of this study | 20 | ||
Documents used in the research for this book | 21 | ||
Considering the ethics | 22 | ||
Structure of the book | 24 | ||
1. The Background to the Familial Homicide of Peter Connelly | 26 | ||
Introduction | 26 | ||
The nature and prevalence of familial child homicide | 26 | ||
Familial child homicide (1997–2010) | 28 | ||
The history and perceptions of the London Borough of Haringey and its Council | 29 | ||
Haringey’s population | 29 | ||
Haringey’s children | 30 | ||
Haringey’s child protection services | 31 | ||
Haringey Council and its past | 32 | ||
Haringey Council’s improvement and decline | 36 | ||
Conclusion | 38 | ||
2. The Denial of Crimes Against Children | 40 | ||
Introduction | 40 | ||
Childhood, the family and social care services | 41 | ||
Sequestration of information about child death | 45 | ||
The effects of sequestration | 46 | ||
Growing awareness of ‘child abuse’ | 50 | ||
Contemporary knowledge of familial child homicide | 51 | ||
Six high-profile inquiries into familial child abuse and homicide | 53 | ||
Maria Colwell | 54 | ||
Jasmine Beckford | 56 | ||
Events in Cleveland, North-East England | 60 | ||
The aftermath of the death of James Bulger | 64 | ||
Satanic abuse | 66 | ||
Victoria Climbié | 66 | ||
Conclusion | 69 | ||
3. Exploring Processes of Blame, Fear and Denial from a Psychosocial Perspective | 72 | ||
Introduction | 72 | ||
The place of psychoanalytic concepts in the psychosocial | 73 | ||
‘Othering’ | 77 | ||
Denial | 79 | ||
The dynamics of denial | 80 | ||
Blaming and scapegoating | 83 | ||
The effects of social media | 84 | ||
‘The circulation of affect’ | 86 | ||
The interaction of the media, politicians and the public | 89 | ||
The impact of relationships between the media and politicians | 89 | ||
The media’s role in holding power to account | 91 | ||
Engagement with the public | 94 | ||
Two research studies | 97 | ||
Conclusion | 99 | ||
4. The Socio-Political and Cultural Context of the Death of Peter Connelly | 102 | ||
Introduction | 102 | ||
The impact of Labour policies on families and children’s social care | 103 | ||
New Labour policies for children and families | 103 | ||
Labour and social care policies in Every Child Matters (ECM) | 108 | ||
The delivery of social care | 109 | ||
Systems of governance, partnership and accountability | 111 | ||
Inspection of Children’s Services | 112 | ||
The impact of Labour’s Every Child Matters (ECM) initiative | 113 | ||
The science of child abuse and its effects | 113 | ||
Risk management | 116 | ||
Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) | 118 | ||
The impact of models of public accountability | 119 | ||
The political context preceding public knowledge of the familial homicide of Peter Connelly | 123 | ||
Conclusion | 128 | ||
5. The Narrative about Baby P Emerges | 130 | ||
Introduction | 130 | ||
Tuesday 11 November 2008 | 131 | ||
Wednesday 12 November 2008 | 138 | ||
The exchange at Prime Minister’s Question Time | 140 | ||
Ed Balls reacted | 142 | ||
David Cameron’s article in the Evening Standard | 143 | ||
The responses of members of the public on day 2 | 148 | ||
Thursday 13 November 2008 | 150 | ||
David Cameron’s letter published in the Sun | 151 | ||
Ed Balls changed his position | 155 | ||
Haringey Council politicians | 158 | ||
The responses of members of the public on day 3 | 159 | ||
Friday 14 November 2008 | 162 | ||
The responses of members of the public on day 4 | 165 | ||
Saturday 15 and Sunday 16 November 2008 | 167 | ||
The responses of members of the public on day 5 | 172 | ||
From virtual to actual presence on the streets | 176 | ||
Uncertainty, power and familial child homicide | 177 | ||
Conclusion | 179 | ||
6. The Identification of a Cultural Trope that Blames Social Workers for Harm to Children | 181 | ||
Introduction | 181 | ||
Mediated populist engagement | 182 | ||
Distortions of ‘public accountability’ | 185 | ||
Bringing closure | 187 | ||
Identifying and defining the cultural trope | 194 | ||
The potency of the cultural trope | 197 | ||
Ofsted’s accusation of deceit | 197 | ||
Presentations in court | 198 | ||
The ‘official’ Serious Case Review (SCR2) | 199 | ||
How far-reaching is the cultural trope? | 203 | ||
The inquest for Peter Connelly | 206 | ||
Transcending Blame, Fear and Denial | 208 | ||
The crime of familial child homicide | 211 | ||
The cultural trope and the proposed crime of ‘wilful neglect’ | 213 | ||
New opportunities | 218 | ||
Where next? | 221 | ||
Appendix 1 - Who’s Who? | 225 | ||
Appendix 2 - Glossary | 228 | ||
Appendix 3 - The Research Materials and Their Uses | 231 | ||
Bibliography | 238 | ||
Notes | 259 | ||
Subject Index | 263 | ||
Author Index | 269 |