Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Total hip replacement is increasingly gaining acceptance in patients with arthritis, trauma, or malignancy destroyed hip joints. Hip replacement being a highly complex surgery requires expertise and knowledge of different techniques and equipments. There has been an increase in the number of young patients undergoing hip replacement, thus more so increasing the need of long lasting implants and best possible functioning. Moreover, the newer techniques like computerassisted hip arthroplasty and minimally invasive hip replacement have benefited the patients with the advantages of faster recovery, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and reduction in treatment costs.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Cover \r | Front Cover | ||
| Front Matter \r | ia | ||
| Copyright | id | ||
| ECAB Clinical Update:Orthopedics | ie | ||
| Total Hip Replacement: Spectrum | if | ||
| Acknowledgement | ig | ||
| Contents | ii | ||
| ECAB Clinical Update InformationTOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: SPECTRUM | i | ||
| Preface | v | ||
| Current Status of Hip Resection Arthroplasty | 1a | ||
| ABSTRACT: | 1a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 1a | ||
| Excision Arthroplasty | 1 | ||
| Historical Perspectives | 2 | ||
| Types of Girdlestone Excision Arthroplasty | 4 | ||
| Primary | 4 | ||
| Secondary or Modified | 4 | ||
| Surgical Technique | 5 | ||
| Postoperative Care | 7 | ||
| Role of Excision Arthroplasty in Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty | 8 | ||
| Overall Outcome | 12 | ||
| Primary Excision Arthroplasty | 12 | ||
| Secondary (Salvage) Resection Arthroplasty | 14 | ||
| Delayed Re-implantation Following Girdlestone Arthroplasty | 18 | ||
| Conclusions | 18 | ||
| Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip: Where do We Stand Today? | 23a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 23a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 23a | ||
| Introduction | 23 | ||
| Bipolar Concept | 26 | ||
| Evolving Designs | 27 | ||
| Indications | 30 | ||
| Relative Contraindications | 32 | ||
| Complications | 32 | ||
| Outcome Evaluations | 34 | ||
| Discussion | 34 | ||
| The Cemented Total Hip | 41a | ||
| ABSTRACT: | 41a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 41a | ||
| Introduction | 41 | ||
| Design Philosophies | 41 | ||
| Indications | 43 | ||
| Results | 44 | ||
| Overview | 44 | ||
| Registries | 45 | ||
| Published Series | 47 | ||
| Surgical Technique | 49 | ||
| Acetabulum | 50 | ||
| Femur | 52 | ||
| Complex Primary Total Hip Replacement | 53 | ||
| Mortality | 55 | ||
| Clinical Advantages of A cemented THR | 56 | ||
| Conclusion | 59 | ||
| Surface Replacement Arthroplasty | 61a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 61a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 61b | ||
| History of Surface Replacement Arthroplasty | 62 | ||
| New Metal-on-Metal Technology | 63 | ||
| Current Designs-Resurfacing Hip | 64 | ||
| Patient Selection | 65 | ||
| Replacement Arthroplasty: Implant Design | 67 | ||
| Metallurgy | 69 | ||
| Fixation of Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing Implants | 69 | ||
| Pre-Operative Planning for Surgery | 71 | ||
| Femoral Templating | 71 | ||
| Acetabular Templating | 71 | ||
| Surgical Approaches/Steps for Surface Replacement Arthroplasty | 72 | ||
| Postoperative Rehabilitation | 75 | ||
| Surface Replacement Arthroplasty: Complications and Associated Problems | 76 | ||
| Femoral Neck Fractures | 77 | ||
| Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head | 78 | ||
| Metal Reaction and Raised Ion Levels | 78 | ||
| Aseptic Loosening of the Components (Femoral) | 79 | ||
| Other Complications | 79 | ||
| Conclusion | 80 | ||
| Birmingham Mid-Head Resection Arthroplasty | 84a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 84a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 84a | ||
| Indications | 85 | ||
| Procedure | 86 | ||
| Step 1: (See Figure 2) | 87 | ||
| Step 2: (See Figure 3) | 87 | ||
| Step 3: (See Figure 4) | 87 | ||
| Step 4: (See Figure 5) | 89 | ||
| Step 5: (See Figure 6) | 89 | ||
| Step 6: (See Figure 7) | 90 | ||
| Step 7: (See Figure 8) | 90 | ||
| Results | 90 | ||
| Short Metaphyseal Stems-Are They the Future? | 92a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 92a | ||
| KEYWORDS: | 92b | ||
| Introduction | 92 | ||
| Proximal Load Transfer | 93 | ||
| Principle of Proximal Load Transfer | 93 | ||
| Lateral Flare | 94 | ||
| Conservative Implants-Design Evolution | 95 | ||
| Ips and Santori's Custom Stem | 97 | ||
| Proxima Hip-Product Design | 100 | ||
| Surgical Steps | 101 | ||
| Our Study Results | 102 | ||
| Discussion | 105 | ||
| Update on Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty | 110a | ||
| ABSTRACT: | 110a | ||
| KEYWORDS: | 110a | ||
| Introduction | 110 | ||
| Polyethylene | 112 | ||
| Metal-On-Metal | 116 | ||
| Retrieval Studies of Second-Generation M/M Articulations | 120 | ||
| Future of M/M Hip Arthroplasty | 122 | ||
| Ceramic-On-Ceramic | 123 | ||
| Author'S Personal Recommendations | 126 | ||
| MIS Techniques for Total Hip Replacement | 134a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 134a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 134a | ||
| Introduction | 134 | ||
| What Defines Mis? | 135 | ||
| Who is a Good Candidate for Mis Tha? | 135 | ||
| Who is Not a Good Candidate for MIS THA? | 135 | ||
| Techniques of Mis Tha | 136 | ||
| Mini-Posterior Approach4 | 136 | ||
| Mini-Anterolateral Approach | 136 | ||
| Two-Incision Approach | 137 | ||
| Single Incision Direct Anterior Approach | 138 | ||
| What are the Advantages of MIS THA? | 139 | ||
| Dedicated Instrumentation for Mis Tha | 141 | ||
| Are The Advantages Claimed With Mis tha Real? | 143 | ||
| Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty | 149a | ||
| ABSTRACT | 149a | ||
| KEYWORDS | 149a | ||
| Potential Advantages | 150 | ||
| Potential Disadvantages | 151 | ||
| Operative Technique | 151 | ||
| System Set-up | 152 | ||
| Registration of Pelvis and Acetabulum | 152 | ||
| Femoral Registration | 153 | ||
| Acetabular Cup | 153 | ||
| Femoral Stem | 154 | ||
| Final Steps | 155 | ||
| Future of Caos | 156 | ||
| Other Books in this Series | 157 |