BOOK
Duke Review of MRI Principles:Case Review Series E-Book
Wells Mangrum | Quoc Bao Hoang | Tim J Amrhein | Scott M Duncan | Charles M Maxfield | Elmar Merkle | Allen W Song
(2018)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
A solid understanding of MRI physics is essential for both residents and practicing radiologists, and Duke Review of MRI Physics Principles: Case Review Series, 2nd Edition, provides practical applications, board-style self-assessment questions, and clinically relevant cases in a high-yield, easy-to-digest format. Designed to help you solve clinical questions, arrive at accurate diagnoses, and use MRI more effectively in your practice, it uses a case-based approach to demonstrate the basic physics of MRI and how it applies to successful and accurate imaging, interpretation, and diagnosis.
- Includes a new chapter on MRI Safety, as well as new and improved color images in functional MRI, perfusion MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging.
- Includes new Take-Home-Points at the end of each chapter for easy recall and review.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Front Cover | Cover | ||
IFC | ES1 | ||
Duke Reviewof MRI Physics: CASE REVIEW SERIES\r | i | ||
Series Editor | ii | ||
Volumes in the CASE REVIEW Series | ii | ||
Duke Reviewof MRI Physics: CASE REVIEW SERIES\r | iii | ||
Copyright | iv | ||
Dedication\r | v | ||
CONTRIBUTORS | vii | ||
SERIES FOREWORD | ix | ||
PREFACE | xi | ||
CONTENTS | xiii | ||
1 - T1 Contrast\r | 1 | ||
Case Answers | 2 | ||
Basic Spin Principles and T1 Relaxation | 2 | ||
T1 Contrast and Pulse Sequence Considerations | 3 | ||
Spin Echo | 3 | ||
Gradient Recalled Echo | 3 | ||
Clinical Applications | 4 | ||
2 - T2 Contrast\r | 11 | ||
Case Answers | 12 | ||
Basic Spin Principles and T2 Relaxation | 12 | ||
T2 Contrast and Pulse Sequence Considerations | 13 | ||
Spin Echo | 13 | ||
Gradient Recalled Echo | 14 | ||
Fat on T2-Weighted Imaging | 15 | ||
CASE 2.2 ANSWER | 15 | ||
Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease | 17 | ||
Variable Appearance of Fluid on T2-Weighted Imaging | 17 | ||
CASES 2.3, 2.4, AND 2.5 ANSWERS | 17 | ||
Cavernoma With Superficial Siderosis | 19 | ||
Appearance of Blood on T2-Weighted Spin Echo Images | 19 | ||
CASES 2.6 AND 2.7 ANSWERS | 19 | ||
Pivot Shift Bone Marrow Contusion | 20 | ||
Marrow T2 Hyperintensity | 20 | ||
CASE 2.8 ANSWER | 20 | ||
Vasogenic Edema Secondary to Multiple Brain Metastases | 21 | ||
Vasogenic Edema and Cytotoxic Edema | 21 | ||
CASES 2.9, 2.10, AND 2.11 ANSWERS | 22 | ||
MR Cholangiopancreatography | 23 | ||
CASES 2.12, 2.13, AND 2.14 ANSWERS | 23 | ||
Peripheral Nerve Schwannoma | 25 | ||
Hepatic Hemangioma | 25 | ||
T2 Hyperintense Neoplasms | 25 | ||
CASES 2.15, 2.16, AND 2.17 ANSWER | 25 | ||
Full-Thickness Tear of the Supraspinatus Tendon | 26 | ||
Fibulocollateral Ligament Sprain | 26 | ||
Physics of Low T2 Signal in Tendons and Ligaments | 26 | ||
CASE 2.19 ANSWER | 26 | ||
MR Appearance of Cartilage | 27 | ||
CASE 2.20 ANSWER | 27 | ||
Septate Uterus | 28 | ||
Uterine Leiomyomas | 28 | ||
Uterine Anatomy and Tight Cell Packing | 28 | ||
CASE 2.22 ANSWER | 28 | ||
Prostate Adenocarcinoma Invasion into the Left Seminal Vesicles | 29 | ||
Brain Abscess With a Thin T2 Hypointense Rim | 30 | ||
Pathology Manifesting as T2 Hypointensity | 30 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 30 | ||
Physics | 30 | ||
Clinical Considerations | 30 | ||
References | 31 | ||
3 - Proton Density\r | 33 | ||
Case Answers | 34 | ||
Physics | 34 | ||
Clinical Considerations | 35 | ||
4 - Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents\r | 39 | ||
Case Answers | 40 | ||
Physics | 40 | ||
Discussion | 41 | ||
CASE 4.2 ANSWERS | 41 | ||
Discussion | 42 | ||
CASE 4.3 ANSWERS | 42 | ||
Discussion | 43 | ||
CASE 4.4 ANSWERS | 43 | ||
Discussion | 44 | ||
CASE 4.5 ANSWERS | 44 | ||
Discussion | 45 | ||
CASE 4.6 ANSWERS | 45 | ||
Discussion | 46 | ||
CASE 4.7 ANSWERS | 46 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 47 | ||
Suggested Readings | 47 | ||
5 - Frequency and Spatial Saturation Pulses\r | 49 | ||
Case Answers | 50 | ||
Saturation Pulses | 50 | ||
6 - Inversion Recovery\r | 55 | ||
Case Answers | 56 | ||
Inversion Recovery | 56 | ||
Diagnosis | 57 | ||
Discussion | 57 | ||
CASE 6.2 ANSWERS | 58 | ||
Diagnosis | 59 | ||
Discussion | 59 | ||
CASE 6.3 ANSWER | 59 | ||
Diagnosis | 60 | ||
Discussion | 60 | ||
CASE 6.4 ANSWER | 60 | ||
Diagnosis | 61 | ||
7 - Type 2 Chemical Shift Artifact\r | 65 | ||
Case Answers | 66 | ||
Type 2 Chemical Shift | 66 | ||
Hepatic Steatosis and Focal Fat Sparing | 68 | ||
CASES 7.2 AND 7.3 ANSWERS | 68 | ||
Hemosiderin Deposition | 69 | ||
Signal Loss from T2* Decay | 69 | ||
CASES 7.4 AND 7.5 ANSWERS | 70 | ||
Angiomyolipoma and Hemorrhagic Cyst | 71 | ||
Using the India Ink Artifact | 71 | ||
CASES 7.6 AND 7.7 ANSWERS | 71 | ||
Hepatocellular Adenoma | 72 | ||
CASE 7.8 ANSWERS | 72 | ||
Dixon Technique | 72 | ||
Mature Cystic Ovarian Teratoma (Dermoid Cyst) | 74 | ||
Using Fat-Water Separation Imaging | 74 | ||
CASE 7.10 ANSWERS | 74 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 74 | ||
Physics | 74 | ||
Clinical Considerations | 74 | ||
References | 74 | ||
8 - Susceptibility Artifact\r | 77 | ||
Case Answers | 78 | ||
Susceptibility Artifact | 78 | ||
Discussion | 81 | ||
CASES 8.2, 8.3, AND 8.4 ANSWERS | 81 | ||
Susceptibility in Gradient Recalled Echo and Susceptibility-Weighted Image Sequences | 81 | ||
Discussion | 82 | ||
Further Considerations Regarding Susceptibility in GRE and SWI Sequences | 82 | ||
CASE 8.5 ANSWER | 82 | ||
Blooming Due to Susceptibility | 83 | ||
CASE 8.6 ANSWER | 83 | ||
Discussion | 84 | ||
Susceptibility Effects in Relation to Time to Echo | 84 | ||
CASES 8.7 AND 8.8 ANSWERS | 84 | ||
Susceptibility and Fat Suppression | 85 | ||
CASE 8.9 ANSWER | 85 | ||
Discussion | 86 | ||
Susceptibility With Flair Imaging | 86 | ||
CASE 8.10 ANSWER | 86 | ||
Discussion | 88 | ||
Susceptibility With Diffusion Imaging | 88 | ||
CASE 8.11 ANSWER | 88 | ||
Susceptibility With T2-Weighted Imaging | 89 | ||
CASES 8.12, 8.13, AND 8.14 ANSWER | 89 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS\r | 89 | ||
Defining Susceptibility\r | 89 | ||
Methods to Reduce Susceptibility Artifact | 89 | ||
Clinical Utility of Susceptibility Artifact | 89 | ||
Susceptibility Artifact Interference With Diagnosis | 89 | ||
Sequences Sensitive to Susceptibility Effects | 89 | ||
References | 90 | ||
9 - Motion, Pulsation, and Other Artifacts \r | 91 | ||
CASE ANSWERS | 92 | ||
Motion and Pulsation Artifact | 92 | ||
10 - Vascular Contrast\r | 107 | ||
CASE ANSWERS | 108 | ||
Vascular Contrast | 109 | ||
Flow Voids | 109 | ||
Flow-Related Enhancement | 109 | ||
Entry Slice Phenomenon | 110 | ||
Gradient Moment Nulling | 110 | ||
Discussion | 112 | ||
CASE 10.2 ANSWER | 112 | ||
Discussion | 113 | ||
CASE 10.3 ANSWERS | 113 | ||
11 - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging\r | 121 | ||
CASE ANSWERS | 122 | ||
Discussion | 122 | ||
Cardiac MRI | 122 | ||
Black Blood Technique | 122 | ||
White Blood Technique | 123 | ||
Discussion | 124 | ||
CASE 11.2 ANSWER | 124 | ||
Discussion | 125 | ||
CASE 11.3 ANSWERS | 125 | ||
Discussion | 126 | ||
CASE 11.4 ANSWERS | 126 | ||
Discussion | 127 | ||
CASE 11.5 ANSWER | 127 | ||
Discussion | 128 | ||
CASE 11.6 ANSWERS | 129 | ||
Discussion | 130 | ||
CASE 11.7 ANSWER | 130 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 130 | ||
References | 130 | ||
12 - Time-of-Flight Imaging\r | 131 | ||
Case Answers | 132 | ||
Physics | 132 | ||
Signal Saturation | 132 | ||
Inflow of Unsaturated (Fresh) Protons | 133 | ||
Limitations to Time of Flight | 133 | ||
Additional Properties Unique to Time of Flight | 134 | ||
Discussion | 135 | ||
CASE 12.2 ANSWERS | 136 | ||
Discussion | 137 | ||
CASE 12.3 ANSWERS | 137 | ||
Discussion | 138 | ||
CASE 12.4 ANSWER | 138 | ||
Discussion | 139 | ||
CASE 12.5 ANSWER | 139 | ||
Discussion | 140 | ||
CASE 12.6 ANSWER | 140 | ||
Discussion | 142 | ||
CASE 12.7 ANSWER | 142 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 143 | ||
References | 143 | ||
13 - Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography\r | 145 | ||
CASE ANSWERS | 146 | ||
Time-Resolved Magnetic Resonance Angiography | 146 | ||
k-Space Physics | 146 | ||
k-Space Filling Techniques | 147 | ||
Parallel Imaging | 147 | ||
Discussion | 149 | ||
CASE 13.2 ANSWERS | 149 | ||
Discussion | 150 | ||
CASE 13.3 ANSWER | 150 | ||
Discussion | 152 | ||
CASE 13.4 ANSWERS | 152 | ||
Discussion | 154 | ||
CASE 13.5 ANSWER | 154 | ||
Discussion | 156 | ||
CASE 13.6 ANSWER | 156 | ||
Discussion | 157 | ||
CASE 13.7 ANSWER | 157 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 158 | ||
References | 158 | ||
14 - Phase Contrast\r | 159 | ||
Case Answers | 160 | ||
Thrombus | 161 | ||
Phase Contrast Imaging | 161 | ||
Conventional Two- and Three-Dimensional Phase Contrast Imaging | 161 | ||
Four-Dimensional Phase Contrast Imaging | 163 | ||
CASE 14.2 ANSWERS | 163 | ||
Right Transverse and Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis | 163 | ||
Magnetic Resonance Venogram | 163 | ||
CASE 14.3 ANSWERS | 164 | ||
Chiari I Malformation | 165 | ||
Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow | 165 | ||
CASE 14.4 ANSWERS | 165 | ||
Atrial Septal Defect | 166 | ||
Flow Assessment | 166 | ||
CASE 14.5 ANSWERS | 166 | ||
Phase Contrast Assessment of Aortic Valve Pathology and Cardiac Flow Quantification | 169 | ||
CASES 14.6 AND 14.7 ANSWERS | 169 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 169 | ||
Physics | 169 | ||
Clinical Considerations | 169 | ||
References | 169 | ||
15 - Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging\r | 171 | ||
Case Answers | 172 | ||
Physics | 173 | ||
Discussion | 175 | ||
CASE 15.2 ANSWERS | 175 | ||
16 - Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging\r | 187 | ||
CASE ANSWER | 188 | ||
Discussion | 189 | ||
Ring Artifact | 189 | ||
CASE 16.2 ANSWER | 189 | ||
Discussion | 190 | ||
Cardiac Perfusion MRI: Further Considerations | 190 | ||
CASE 16.3 ANSWER | 190 | ||
Brain Perfusion MRI | 191 | ||
CASE 16.4 ANSWER | 191 | ||
MRI Perfusion Limitations | 192 | ||
CASE 16.5 ANSWER | 192 | ||
Discussion | 193 | ||
MRI Perfusion Methods | 193 | ||
CASE 16.6 ANSWER | 195 | ||
Discussion | 196 | ||
Other Uses of MRI Perfusion | 196 | ||
CASE 16.7 ANSWER | 196 | ||
Discussion | 197 | ||
Other Uses of MRI Perfusion | 197 | ||
CASE 16.8 ANSWER | 197 | ||
Discussion | 198 | ||
CASE 16.9 ANSWER | 198 | ||
Discussion | 199 | ||
CASE 16.10 ANSWER | 199 | ||
Discussion | 201 | ||
CASE 16.11 ANSWER | 201 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 201 | ||
Defining Perfusion | 201 | ||
Cardiac Perfusion Imaging | 201 | ||
Brain Perfusion Imaging | 201 | ||
Body Perfusion Imaging | 201 | ||
References | 201 | ||
17 - Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy\r | 203 | ||
CASE ANSWER | 203 | ||
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy | 204 | ||
Discussion | 205 | ||
Normal Spectrum | 205 | ||
CASE 17.2 ANSWERS | 206 | ||
Astrocytoma Grading | 206 | ||
Single-Voxel Versus Multivoxel Spectroscopy | 207 | ||
CASE 17.3 ANSWER | 207 | ||
Low-Grade Astrocytoma | 208 | ||
Spectroscopy Changes With Field Strength and Time to Echo | 208 | ||
CASE 17.4 ANSWER | 208 | ||
Lactate Peaks | 209 | ||
CASE 17.5 ANSWER | 209 | ||
Acute Infarct | 210 | ||
CASE 17.6 ANSWER | 210 | ||
Kearns-Sayre Syndrome | 210 | ||
CASE 17.7 ANSWER | 210 | ||
Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy | 211 | ||
Voxel Size in Spectroscopy | 212 | ||
CASE 17.8 ANSWER | 212 | ||
Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System | 213 | ||
CASE 17.9 ANSWER | 213 | ||
Krabbe Disease | 214 | ||
Multivoxel Spectroscopy | 214 | ||
CASE 17.10 ANSWERS | 214 | ||
Alzheimer Disease | 215 | ||
CASE 17.11 ANSWER | 215 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 215 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGMENT | 215 | ||
References | 215 | ||
18 - Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging\r | 217 | ||
Case Answers | 218 | ||
Functional MRI | 219 | ||
Wada Test and Intraoperative Cortical Stimulation | 219 | ||
BOLD Effect and the Hemodynamic Response | 219 | ||
Creating fMRI Images | 220 | ||
Diagnosis | 221 | ||
Discussion | 221 | ||
fMRI Tasks | 221 | ||
CASE 18.2 ANSWERS | 221 | ||
Diagnosis | 222 | ||
Discussion | 222 | ||
Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data | 222 | ||
CASE 18.3 ANSWERS | 223 | ||
Diagnosis | 223 | ||
Discussion | 223 | ||
Supplementary Cortical Activation | 223 | ||
CASE 18.4 ANSWERS | 223 | ||
Diagnosis | 225 | ||
Discussion | 225 | ||
Participatory Cortical Areas | 225 | ||
CASE 18.5 ANSWER | 225 | ||
Diagnosis | 226 | ||
Discussion | 226 | ||
Susceptibility Artifact | 226 | ||
CASE 18.6 ANSWER | 226 | ||
Diagnosis | 227 | ||
Discussion | 227 | ||
Pathology Results in Alterations to the Hemodynamic Response | 227 | ||
CASE 18.7 ANSWER | 227 | ||
Diagnosis | 228 | ||
Discussion | 228 | ||
Tumors Effect on Autoregulation | 228 | ||
CASE 18.8 ANSWER | 228 | ||
Diagnosis | 229 | ||
Discussion | 229 | ||
Motion and Susceptibility Artifact Limitations | 229 | ||
CASE 18.9 ANSWER | 229 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 229 | ||
References | 229 | ||
19 - Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety\r | 231 | ||
CASE ANSWER | 232 | ||
MR Safety | 232 | ||
Static Magnetic Field | 232 | ||
Direct Effects of the Static Magnetic Field | 233 | ||
Indirect Effects of the Static Magnetic Field | 233 | ||
ANSWERS: STATIC MAGNETIC FIELD | 234 | ||
Magnetic Materials | 234 | ||
Preventing Accidents Due to Magnetic Attraction | 235 | ||
Quenching | 235 | ||
ANSWERS: QUENCHING | 236 | ||
Gradient Fields | 236 | ||
Direct Effects | 236 | ||
Indirect Effects | 236 | ||
Radiofrequency Field | 236 | ||
ANSWERS: SPECIFIC ENERGY ABSORPTION RATE | 238 | ||
Discussion | 239 | ||
Implants and MRI | 239 | ||
CASE 19.2 ANSWERS | 240 | ||
Discussion | 240 | ||
Active Devices | 240 | ||
CASE 19.3 ANSWERS | 240 | ||
Discussion | 241 | ||
Passive Implants | 241 | ||
Piercings | 241 | ||
Tattoos and Permanent Makeup | 241 | ||
CASE 19.4 ANSWERS | 242 | ||
TAKE-HOME POINTS | 242 | ||
References | 242 | ||
INDEX | 243 | ||
A | 243 | ||
B | 243 | ||
C | 243 | ||
D | 244 | ||
E | 244 | ||
F | 244 | ||
G | 244 | ||
H | 245 | ||
I | 245 | ||
J | 245 | ||
K | 245 | ||
L | 245 | ||
M | 245 | ||
N | 246 | ||
O | 246 | ||
P | 246 | ||
Q | 247 | ||
R | 247 | ||
S | 247 | ||
T | 247 | ||
U | 248 | ||
V | 248 | ||
W | 248 | ||
X | 248 | ||
Z | 248 | ||
IBC | ES2 |