Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
This issue of Surgical Pathology Clinics, edited by Dr. Laura C. Collins, will focus on Breast Pathology. Topics include, but are not limited to: Core needle biopsy of the breast, Mucinous Lesions of the Breast: Pragmatic approach to fibroepithelial lesions; Lymph node inclusions; Differential diagnosis of benign spindle cell lesions of the breast; Ancillary Prognostic and Predictive Testing in Breast Cancer; Lesions of the Low Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway; Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Breast Neoplasia; Lobular Carcinoma in Situ; and Processing and Reporting of Breast Specimens in the Neoadjuvant Setting.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Front Cover | Cover | ||
Breast Pathology | i | ||
Copyright\r | ii | ||
Contributors | iii | ||
CONSULTING EDITOR | iii | ||
EDITOR | iii | ||
AUTHORS | iii | ||
Contents | v | ||
Preface: Contemporary Topics in Breast Pathology | v | ||
Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: An Evaluation of Contemporary Data | v | ||
A Diagnostic Approach to Fibroepithelial Breast Lesions | v | ||
Axillary Lymph Node Inclusions | v | ||
An Update of Mucinous Lesions of the Breast | v | ||
Differential Diagnosis of Benign Spindle Cell Lesions | vi | ||
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ | vi | ||
Ancillary Prognostic and Predictive Testing in Breast Cancer: Focus on Discordant, Unusual, and Borderline Results | vi | ||
Precursor Lesions of the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway | vi | ||
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Breast Cancer | vii | ||
Processing and Reporting of Breast Specimens in the Neoadjuvant Setting | vii | ||
SURGICAL PATHOLOGY CLINICS\r | viii | ||
FORTHCOMING ISSUES | viii | ||
June 2018 | viii | ||
September 2018 | viii | ||
December 2018 | viii | ||
RECENT ISSUES | viii | ||
December 2017 | viii | ||
September 2017 | viii | ||
June 2017 | viii | ||
Preface:\rContemporary Topics in Breast Pathology | ix | ||
Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast | 1 | ||
ABSTRACT | 1 | ||
OVERVIEW: SCREENING AND DETECTION | 1 | ||
ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA | 2 | ||
IMMUNOPHENOTYPE | 3 | ||
OUTCOME FOLLOWING CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY | 3 | ||
ATYPICAL LOBULAR HYPERPLASIA AND LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU | 3 | ||
IMMUNOPHENOTYPE | 4 | ||
OUTCOME FOLLOWING CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY | 4 | ||
FLAT EPITHELIAL ATYPIA | 4 | ||
IMMUNOPHENOTYPE | 5 | ||
OUTCOME FOLLOWING CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY | 5 | ||
PAPILLOMAS | 5 | ||
IMMUNOPHENOTYPE | 6 | ||
OUTCOME FOLLOWING CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY | 7 | ||
RADIAL SCAR | 8 | ||
IMMUNOPHENOTYPE | 9 | ||
OUTCOME FOLLOWING CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY | 9 | ||
SUMMARY | 10 | ||
REFERENCES | 10 | ||
A Diagnostic Approach to Fibroepithelial Breast Lesions | 17 | ||
ABSTRACT | 17 | ||
FIBROADENOMA | 17 | ||
CLINICAL FEATURES | 17 | ||
GROSS FEATURES | 18 | ||
MICROSCOPIC FEATURES | 18 | ||
CYTOLOGIC FINDINGS IN FIBROADENOMA | 18 | ||
FIBROADENOMA VARIANTS | 18 | ||
Cellular Fibroadenoma | 18 | ||
Complex Fibroadenoma | 18 | ||
Juvenile Fibroadenoma | 19 | ||
Myxoid Fibroadenoma | 19 | ||
ANCILLARY INVESTIGATIONS | 21 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 22 | ||
Fibroadenomatoid Change | 22 | ||
Tubular Adenoma | 22 | ||
Nodular Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia | 22 | ||
Mammary Hamartoma | 22 | ||
PROGNOSIS | 22 | ||
PHYLLODES TUMORS | 23 | ||
CLINICAL FEATURES | 23 | ||
GROSS FEATURES | 23 | ||
MICROSCOPIC FEATURES | 23 | ||
Benign Phyllodes Tumor | 23 | ||
Malignant Phyllodes Tumor | 24 | ||
Borderline Phyllodes Tumor | 24 | ||
CYTOLOGIC FINDINGS IN PHYLLODES TUMOR | 25 | ||
A NOTE ON SAMPLING | 29 | ||
ANCILLARY INVESTIGATIONS | 29 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 29 | ||
Fibromatosis | 29 | ||
Metaplastic Carcinoma | 29 | ||
Sarcoma | 29 | ||
Malignant Melanoma | 29 | ||
Periductal Stromal Tumor | 29 | ||
PROGNOSIS | 30 | ||
CORE BIOPSY OF FIBROEPITHELIAL LESIONS: CHALLENGES AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS | 32 | ||
DISTINGUISHING FIBROADENOMA AND PHYLLODES TUMOR ON CYTOLOGY | 35 | ||
A NOTE ON FIBROEPITHELIAL BREAST LESIONS IN YOUNG PATIENTS | 35 | ||
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF FIBROEPITHELIAL BREAST LESIONS | 36 | ||
SUMMARY | 36 | ||
REFERENCES | 37 | ||
Axillary Lymph Node Inclusions | 43 | ||
ABSTRACT | 43 | ||
OVERVIEW | 43 | ||
EPITHELIAL INCLUSIONS | 44 | ||
MAMMARY-TYPE GLANDULAR INCLUSIONS (HETEROTOPIC BREAST PARENCHYMA) | 44 | ||
Pathologic Features | 44 | ||
Differential Diagnosis | 44 | ||
Diagnosis | 44 | ||
Prognosis | 49 | ||
MULLERIAN-TYPE GLANDULAR INCLUSIONS | 49 | ||
Pathologic Features | 49 | ||
Differential Diagnosis | 49 | ||
Diagnosis | 49 | ||
Prognosis | 50 | ||
SQUAMOUS INCLUSIONS | 50 | ||
Pathologic Features | 51 | ||
Differential Diagnosis | 51 | ||
Diagnosis | 51 | ||
Prognosis | 52 | ||
MIXED GLANDULAR-SQUAMOUS INCLUSIONS | 52 | ||
Pathologic Features | 52 | ||
Differential Diagnosis | 53 | ||
Diagnosis | 54 | ||
Prognosis | 54 | ||
NONEPITHELIAL INCLUSIONS | 55 | ||
NODAL NEVI | 55 | ||
Pathologic Features | 55 | ||
Differential Diagnosis | 56 | ||
Diagnosis | 56 | ||
Prognosis | 57 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | 57 | ||
REFERENCES | 57 | ||
An Update of Mucinous Lesions of the Breast | 61 | ||
ABSTRACT | 61 | ||
OVERVIEW | 61 | ||
MUCOCELELIKE LESIONS | 62 | ||
GROSS FEATURES | 62 | ||
MICROSCOPIC FEATURES | 62 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 64 | ||
PROGNOSIS | 67 | ||
MUCINOUS CARCINOMA | 69 | ||
GROSS FEATURES | 69 | ||
MICROSCOPIC FEATURES | 69 | ||
DIAGNOSIS | 70 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 71 | ||
PROGNOSIS | 74 | ||
MUCINOUS CYSTADENOCARCINOMA | 75 | ||
SOLID PAPILLARY CARCINOMA | 76 | ||
GROSS FEATURES | 76 | ||
MICROSCOPIC FEATURES | 77 | ||
DIAGNOSIS | 79 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 81 | ||
PROGNOSIS | 81 | ||
INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA WITH EXTRACELLULAR MUCIN PRODUCTION | 81 | ||
SALIVARY GLAND–TYPE TUMORS OF THE BREAST WITH MUCINOUS FEATURES | 82 | ||
MUCOEPIDERMOID CARCINOMA | 82 | ||
ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA | 82 | ||
BREAST LESIONS WITH MUCIN MIMICS | 83 | ||
SUMMARY | 87 | ||
REFERENCES | 87 | ||
Differential Diagnosis of Benign Spindle Cell Lesions | 91 | ||
ABSTRACT | 91 | ||
OVERVIEW | 91 | ||
BENIGN SPINDLE CELL TUMOR-LIKE LESIONS | 93 | ||
BENIGN SPINDLE CELL TUMORS | 95 | ||
BENIGN SPINDLE CELL LESIONS VERSUS BLAND-LOOKING AGGRESSIVE SPINDLE CELL TUMORS | 102 | ||
CONCLUDING REMARKS | 108 | ||
REFERENCES | 117 | ||
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ | 123 | ||
ABSTRACT | 123 | ||
OVERVIEW | 123 | ||
EPIDEMIOLOGY | 124 | ||
CLINICAL FEATURES | 124 | ||
HISTOPATHOLOGY | 124 | ||
CLASSIC LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU | 124 | ||
LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU VARIANTS | 126 | ||
Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ | 126 | ||
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ with Necrosis (Also Known as “Florid” Lobular Carcinoma In Situ) | 128 | ||
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY | 128 | ||
E-CADHERIN | 128 | ||
P120-CATENIN | 131 | ||
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR, PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR, AND HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 | 133 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS AND DIAGNOSTIC PITFALLS | 134 | ||
LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU VARIANTS MIMIC SOLID DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU | 134 | ||
CLASSIC LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU INVOLVING COLLAGENOUS SPHERULOSIS MIMICS LOW-GRADE CRIBRIFORM DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU | 135 | ||
LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU INVOLVING SCLEROSING ADENOSIS MIMICS INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA | 135 | ||
GENETICS | 135 | ||
NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS | 137 | ||
MANAGEMENT | 139 | ||
SUMMARY | 141 | ||
REFERENCES | 141 | ||
Ancillary Prognostic and Predictive Testing in Breast Cancer | 147 | ||
ABSTRACT | 147 | ||
ROLE OF ANCILLARY TESTS IN BREAST CANCER TREATMENT | 147 | ||
OVERVIEW | 147 | ||
OVERVIEW OF EVALUATION OF DISCORDANT RESULTS | 150 | ||
HORMONE RECEPTOR STAINS | 152 | ||
FUNCTION OF HORMONE RECEPTORS | 152 | ||
INTERPRETATION OF HORMONE RECEPTOR STAINS | 152 | ||
EXPECTED VERSUS UNEXPECTED HORMONE RECEPTOR RESULTS | 153 | ||
Consideration for Additional Testing | 155 | ||
Validation | 155 | ||
INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN EPITHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 RESULTS | 155 | ||
FUNCTION | 156 | ||
TESTING METHODOLOGIES | 156 | ||
INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY | 156 | ||
UNUSUAL STAINING PATTERNS | 157 | ||
INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION TESTING | 160 | ||
USUAL OR BORDERLINE RESULTS | 160 | ||
Group 2 (Ratio ≥2.0 and <4.0 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signals per Cell) | 161 | ||
Group 3 (Ratio <2.0 and ≥6.0 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signals per Cell) | 162 | ||
Group 4 (Ratio <2.0 and 4.0–6.0 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signals per Cell) | 162 | ||
EXPECTED VERSUS UNEXPECTED RESULTS | 162 | ||
Consideration for Additional Testing | 164 | ||
Validation | 164 | ||
PROLIFERATION MARKERS: KI67 AND PANEL-BASED ASSAYS | 164 | ||
Function | 165 | ||
Interpretation | 165 | ||
Ki67 | 165 | ||
Panel-based assays | 168 | ||
Expected Versus Unexpected Results | 169 | ||
Ki67 | 169 | ||
Oncotype DX | 169 | ||
Validation | 169 | ||
SUMMARY | 171 | ||
REFERENCES | 171 | ||
Precursor Lesions of the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway | 177 | ||
ABSTRACT | 177 | ||
OVERVIEW | 177 | ||
COLUMNAR CELL LESIONS | 178 | ||
DEFINITION AND MORPHOLOGY | 178 | ||
PRESENTATION | 180 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 180 | ||
MANAGEMENT | 181 | ||
OUTCOME | 182 | ||
ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA | 183 | ||
DEFINITION AND MORPHOLOGY | 183 | ||
PRESENTATION | 183 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 183 | ||
MANAGEMENT | 186 | ||
OUTCOME | 187 | ||
LOW-GRADE DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU | 188 | ||
DEFINITION AND MORPHOLOGY | 188 | ||
PRESENTATION | 188 | ||
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS | 189 | ||
MANAGEMENT | 190 | ||
OUTCOME | 191 | ||
LOBULAR NEOPLASIA | 191 | ||
INVASIVE CARCINOMAS | 191 | ||
THE LOW-GRADE BREAST NEOPLASIA PATHWAY | 191 | ||
SUMMARY | 194 | ||
REFERENCES | 194 | ||
Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Breast Cancer | 199 | ||
ABSTRACT | 199 | ||
OVERVIEW | 199 | ||
SECRETORY CARCINOMA | 200 | ||
ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA | 202 | ||
INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA | 204 | ||
SOLID PAPILLARY CARCINOMA WITH REVERSE POLARITY | 205 | ||
PHENOTYPIC CORRELATES OF MOLECULAR SUBTYPES AND HEREDITARY BREAST CANCERS | 207 | ||
SUMMARY | 208 | ||
REFERENCES | 208 | ||
Processing and Reporting of Breast Specimens in the Neoadjuvant Setting | 213 | ||
ABSTRACT | 213 | ||
NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER | 213 | ||
MULTIDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATION | 214 | ||
ROLE OF PATHOLOGY BEFORE NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT | 215 | ||
INITIAL DIAGNOSIS | 215 | ||
EVALUATION OF THE AXILLA | 215 | ||
CLIPS | 215 | ||
ROLE OF PATHOLOGY AFTER NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT | 217 | ||
PROCESSING OF POST-NEOADJUVANT BREAST CANCER SPECIMENS | 217 | ||
Post-neoadjuvant Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection Specimens | 217 | ||
Small Lumpectomy Specimens | 218 | ||
Large Lumpectomy Specimens | 218 | ||
Mastectomy Specimens | 218 | ||
Extent of Sampling for Large Lumpectomy and Mastectomy Specimens | 218 | ||
Submitting Samples for Research | 219 | ||
MICROSCOPIC EVALUATION | 219 | ||
Tumor Type and Grade | 219 | ||
Size and Extent | 219 | ||
Cellularity | 221 | ||
Lymphovascular Invasion | 221 | ||
Margins | 221 | ||
Lymph Node Status | 221 | ||
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER | 222 | ||
Complete Pathologic Response | 222 | ||
Residual Disease | 222 | ||
Other Prognostic Factors | 224 | ||
Future Directions | 225 | ||
SUMMARY | 228 | ||
REFERENCES | 229 |