BOOK
Modern Japanese Political Thought and International Relations
(2018)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
In an ever more globalized world, sustainable global development requires effective intercultural co-operations. This dialogue between non-western and western cultures is essential to identifying global solutions for global socio-political challenges.
Modern Japanese Political Thought and International Relations critiques the formation of non-western International Relations by assessing Japanese political concepts to contemporary IR discourses since the Meji Restoration, to better understand knowledge exchanges in intercultural contexts. Each chapter focuses on a particular aspect of this dialogue, from international law and nationalism to concepts of peace and Daoism, this collection grapples with postcolonial questions of Japan’s indigenous IR theory.
Felix Rosch is Senior Lecturer in International Relations, Coventry University.
Atsuko Watanabe is Research Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, University of Tokyo.
This book aims to overcome a difficulty that International Relations, the most international, but not necessarily global social science, is facing: by viewing Japan as ‘a potential’, it tries to put a global International Relations into practice. While this book looks at modern Japanese thought from an encompassing perspective, the chapters are surprisingly consistent in their concerted effort to elicit global implications from this local perspective. Dedicated students who are striving for going beyond conventional research and education will profit from reading this book.
Shigeto Sonoda, Professor of Sociology, University of Tokyo
Opening innovative ways to rethink global politics through the lens of Japanese political theory, this book explores the implications arising from the classic twin IR banners of anarchy and sovereignty, and instead focuses on the notions of difference and dialogue in order to elucidate the value-added of a global IR. It combines Japanese political thought and International Relations theory in a fresh and stimulating way, taking its cues from a close reading of historical and legal, as well as popular cultural sources. To this end, Rösch and Watanabe have succeeded in bringing together the best possible team of scholars in the fields of international law, international political theory and Japanese political theory, in particular from within Japan, but also from the anglophone world. The quality of this coherently structured volume is outstanding. It is a must read both in IR and political theory, as it has something to offer for different audiences: experts on Japanese external relations and readers interested in theories of IR, as well as those looking for novel sources on philosophical and anthropological thought on the contested notion of the global. This is scholarship of the finest kind!
Dirk Nabers, Professor for International Political Sociology, University of Kiel
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover | Cover | ||
Modern Japanese Political Thought and International Relations | i | ||
Modern Japanese Political Thought and International Relations | iii | ||
Copyright | iv | ||
Contents | v | ||
Acknowledgments | vii | ||
Introduction | 1 | ||
Challenging International Law and Toward a Global IR? | 21 | ||
Chapter 1 | 23 | ||
How Did Two Daos Perceive the International Differently? | 23 | ||
A Quasi Solidarity? | 24 | ||
Ethos and Social Imaginary | 25 | ||
Perceptions of the International in Japan and China | 28 | ||
Conclusion | 39 | ||
References | 40 | ||
Chapter 2 | 43 | ||
Japan’s Early Challenge to Eurocentrism and the World Court | 43 | ||
The Japanese Government and the World Court | 45 | ||
Japan’s Turn to Civilizational Egocentrism | 50 | ||
Conclusion: The Legacy of Japan’s Early Attempt to Challenge Eurocentrism | 51 | ||
Notes | 53 | ||
References | 54 | ||
Chapter 3 | 57 | ||
Kōtarō Tanaka (1890–1974) and Global International Relations | 57 | ||
Prelude to Tanaka’s Latin American Informal Diplomacy | 58 | ||
National Diplomacy in Practice: Tanaka’s Intercultural Activities | 62 | ||
Tanaka’s Latin American–Based IR Theory | 67 | ||
Notes | 71 | ||
References | 72 | ||
Empire-Building or in Search for Global Peace? | 75 | ||
Chapter 4 | 77 | ||
Unlearning Asia | 77 | ||
Another Story of “Region”? | 78 | ||
Re-Contextualizing Datsu-A-Ron | 80 | ||
Past, Present, and Future | 85 | ||
Conclusion: Region as Alternative? | 87 | ||
Note | 88 | ||
References | 89 | ||
Chapter 5 | 93 | ||
Pursuing a More Dynamic Concept of Peace | 93 | ||
Establishing the IPR | 95 | ||
The IPR in the 1920s: Peace as Preserving \nthe Status Quo | 99 | ||
The IPR after the 1930s: Searching a Renewed Concept of Peace | 101 | ||
The IPR and the Contemporary World | 105 | ||
Notes | 106 | ||
References | 107 | ||
Chapter 6 | 111 | ||
Rethinking the Liberal/Pluralist Vision of Japan’s Colonial Studies | 111 | ||
Colonial Studies in Japan | 112 | ||
Civilization and Global Civil Society | 115 | ||
Dehumanizing Effects of Colonization and Colonial Economic Development | 116 | ||
Autonomy of the Colonized | 119 | ||
Promoting Autonomy in the Liberal International Order | 123 | ||
Conclusion | 125 | ||
References | 125 | ||
Local(ized) Japanese Political Concepts for Twenty-First Century International Relations | 129 | ||
Chapter 7 | 131 | ||
Who Are the People? | 131 | ||
Kokumin, Minzoku, and Shimin: Communist Discourses, 1945–1955 | 133 | ||
Differences in Party Platforms: 1945–1964 | 136 | ||
The Rise of Shimin: 1960–1970 | 138 | ||
Two Connotations of Shimin: 1970–1996 | 142 | ||
Backlash against Shimin and the Return to Kokumin: 1996–2009 | 144 | ||
And the Present: From 2009 to Today | 146 | ||
Notes | 147 | ||
References | 148 | ||
Chapter 8 | 151 | ||
Amae as Emotional Interdependence | 151 | ||
Dependence and Dependency in IR | 152 | ||
Amae: Emotional Interdependence | 155 | ||
Japan’s Nuclear Energy and the United States | 158 | ||
Conclusion | 162 | ||
Notes | 163 | ||
References | 163 | ||
Chapter 9 | 167 | ||
The Pitfalls in the Project of Overcoming Western Modernity | 167 | ||
A Reversal of Superiority: The Emergence of Western “Universality” | 169 | ||
Overcoming Modernity and \nPan-Asianism as a Rhetoric | 172 | ||
The Logic of Violent Paternalism in Asianism | 175 | ||
Conclusion | 177 | ||
Notes | 179 | ||
References | 180 | ||
Forming an Imagined Community, yet Reaching People Globally? | 183 | ||
Chapter 10 | 185 | ||
From Failure to Fame | 185 | ||
Part 1: Names, Vignettes, and Failure | 187 | ||
Part 2: “Shōin” Becomes a Hero | 193 | ||
Conclusion | 198 | ||
Notes | 201 | ||
References | 201 | ||
Chapter 11 | 203 | ||
Hayao Miyazaki as a Political Thinker | 203 | ||
Culture as Power | 204 | ||
Japan’s Soft Power Diplomacy Values and Right Wing Kyoto School Philosophers’ Cultural Politics | 208 | ||
Culture and Self-Reflection in Tosaka’s Theory of Morality | 210 | ||
Hayao Miyazaki’s Anime and Moral Reflection | 212 | ||
Conclusion | 216 | ||
Notes | 216 | ||
References | 217 | ||
Chapter 12 | 221 | ||
Who’s the Egg? Who’s the Wall? | 221 | ||
The Wall versus the Egg | 222 | ||
Hong Kong since the Umbrella Movement | 227 | ||
Egg as Food or as Life? | 229 | ||
An Egg, and so Much More | 230 | ||
Who’s the Wall? | 232 | ||
On to Ontology | 235 | ||
Conclusion | 237 | ||
Notes | 237 | ||
References | 238 | ||
Unique, but in What Sense? | 243 | ||
The Self in the Japanese Formula | 244 | ||
In Lieu of Conclusion: A Dialogue without Boundary | 248 | ||
Notes | 249 | ||
References | 249 | ||
Index | 253 | ||
About the Contributors | 257 | ||
About the Editors | 261 |