BOOK
Environmental Problem-Solving A Video-Enhanced Self-Instructional e-Book from MIT
Lawrence Susskind | Bruno Verdini | Jessica Gordon | Yasmin Zaerpoor
(2017)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
The ‘Environmental Problem-Solving - A Video-Enhanced Self-Instructional e-Book from MIT’ e-book presents short-excerpts from carefully selected readings, expert commentaries on those readings, interactive assignments, short videos of the best MIT student responses to the assignments, exam questions with excellent student responses and additional video excerpts of MIT faculty discussing the four main elements of the curriculum: models of environmental policy-making; competing theories of environmental ethics; tools for environmental assessment and environmental decision-making; and techniques for public engagement and group decision-making. The e-book covers the material presented in the semester-long course required of all students enrolled in MIT’s Environmental Policy and Planning Specialization. It includes the actual assignments the MIT students are expected to complete each week as well as videos of the real-time oral presentations they are required to make to visiting practitioners. The final exam is accompanied by the best student answers.
Dr. Lawrence Susskind is Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning and Head of the Environmental Policy and Planning Group at MIT. One of the founders of the field of environmental dispute resolution, he has been teaching at MIT and Harvard for 45 years.
Dr. Bruno Verdini is Director of the MIT-Harvard Mexico Negotiation Program and Lecturer in Urban Planning and Negotiation at MIT. He teaches MIT’s popular course the ‘Art and Science of Negotiation’.
Jessica Gordon is completing a PhD in Environmental Policy and Planning at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Gordon has worked on environmental issues including climate change, natural resource management and food security.
Yasmin Zaerpoor is a doctoral candidate in Environmental Policy and Planning within the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
The book is divided into four sections: The first section focuses on how certain environmental problems can only be solved through active government effort to implement policies that effectively take science and politics into account. This section introduces readers to foundational concepts, including the steps in the US federal environmental policy-making process, and offers an action-oriented analysis of how environmental policy gets implemented and how practitioners can use comparative analysis of public policy in environmental problem-solving. It concludes with questions about the possibility of a unified theory of environmental policy making. The section empowers readers to develop, through exercises and videos, a solid framework to shape an action plan to solve specific environmental problems.
The next section focuses on formulating a sound philosophical basis for taking action in environmental problem solving situations. This includes a discussion of several ethical frameworks that practitioners can use to underpin the actions they propose. This section begins with a general overview of environmental ethics, and then moves on to a discussion of utilitarianism versus intrinsic value, deep green approaches to environmental problem-solving, the debate over sustainability versus economic growth, and how science and indigenous knowledge can be applied in a wide range of environmental problem-solving situations. The section, through exercises and videos, empowers readers to take a stand on these debates, drawing on practical cases with worked examples.
The penultimate section helps environmental practitioners understand how to use various analytical tools. It includes a quick survey of traditional and non-traditional evaluation tools, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, focusing on environmental impact assessment, cost benefit analysis, ecosystem services analysis, risk assessment, simulation and modeling, and scenario planning. The section, through interactive exercises and videos, empowers readers to practice multi-party environmental problem-solving, and to identify the power of each tool to enhance environmental problem-solving, developing the judgment to enumerate strengths and weaknesses as they see them playing out in practice.
The concluding section is a survey of the theory and practice behind mobilizing support for particular problem-solving ideas. It includes discussions of democratic decision-making and environmental problem solving, how the public can be brought in as a partner, methods of collaborative decision-making, the ideas of consensus building, and how politics and power sway collective action efforts.
“This remarkable e-book contains everything you need to teach a rich, dynamic course on the practical and theoretical dimensions of environmental policy as well as to evaluate your students’ work. It integrates classic readings, commentaries, scenarios and assignments, along with videos of talks by faculty and presentations by students.”
—Judith E. Innes, Professor Emerita, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California Berkeley, USA
“Developed in the classroom of MIT's Department of Urban Studies and Planning, the e-book is the long-awaited textbook for introductory environmental policy courses at both undergraduate and graduate levels. It includes a number of essential reading materials authored by leading scholars that will provide a framework for analyzing the substance and processes of environmental policy. It also comes with scenario-based exercises, suggested assignments, exam questions and even sample answers. It is a must-have volume for all instructors around the world.”
—Masahiro Matsuura, Professor, Meiji University, Graduate School of Governance Studies, Tokyo, Japan
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover | Cover 1 | ||
Front Matter | i | ||
Half title | i | ||
Title page | iii | ||
Copyright information | iv | ||
Table of contents | v | ||
Acknowledgments | ix | ||
Credits and Permissions | xi | ||
Chapters | 1 | ||
Introduction | 1 | ||
Scenarios and Videos | 5 | ||
Section I Influencing the Environmental Policy-Making Process | 7 | ||
Introduction | 7 | ||
Readings and Commentaries | 10 | ||
Steven Cohen—“‘Understanding Environmental Policy’ and ‘A Framework for Understanding the Environmental Policy Issue... | 10 | ||
Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh and Anthony Perl— Studying Public Policy: PolicyCycles & Policy Subsystems | 47 | ||
Lawrence Susskind—Local Planning: Contemporary Principles and Practice | 84 | ||
Elinor Ostrom— The Future of the Commons: Beyond Market Failure andGovernment Regulations | 92 | ||
Scenario: Policy Evaluation | 103 | ||
Video: Student response to Policy Evaluation scenario | 103 | ||
Scenario: Comparative Policy Analysis | 104 | ||
Video: Student response to Comparative Policy Analysis scenario | 104 | ||
Written Assignment 1: National Environmental Policy- Making | 105 | ||
First student response to Assignment 1: National Environmental Policy- Making in theUnited Kingdom | 106 | ||
Second student response to Assignment 1: A Model of Environmental Policy- Making inthe United States | 110 | ||
Notes | 45 | ||
Section II Ethical Dilemmas in Environmental Problem-Solving | 115 | ||
Introduction | 115 | ||
Readings and Commentaries | 117 | ||
Joseph R. DesJardins—Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy | 117 | ||
Jason Corburn— Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice | 142 | ||
Scenario: The Precautionary Principle | 159 | ||
Video Discussion: Dealing with Uncertainty | 159 | ||
Scenario: Sustainability versus Economic Development | 160 | ||
Video: Student response to Sustainability versus Economic Development scenario | 160 | ||
Scenario: Local Knowledge versus Expert Knowledge | 161 | ||
Video: Student response to Local Knowledge versus Expert Knowledge scenario | 161 | ||
Written Assignment 2: Environmental Ethics | 162 | ||
First student response to Assignment 2: Environmental Ethics and Sustainable Development | 163 | ||
Second student response to Assignment 2: The Ethics of Sustainable Development | 167 | ||
Notes | 137 | ||
Section III Developments in Policy And Project Analysis | 171 | ||
Introduction | 171 | ||
Readings and Commentaries | 175 | ||
Lawrence Susskind, Ravi K. Jain and Andrew... | 175 | ||
Ciaran O’Faircheallaigh— Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal | 209 | ||
Arwin van Buuren and Sibout Nooteboom— Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal | 239 | ||
David Pearce, Giles Atkinson and Susana Mourato— Cost Benefit Analysis and theEnvironment: Recent Developments | 258 | ||
Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling— University of Pennsylvania Law Review | 285 | ||
Lawrence H. Goulder and Ian W. H. Parry— Economics of the Environment | 312 | ||
Robert Costanza, Rudolf de Groot, Paul Sutton, Sander van der Ploeg,Sharolyn J. Anderson, Ida Kubiszewski, Stephen Farber and... | 338 | ||
Donald Ludwig— Ecosystems | 358 | ||
Howard Kunreuther and Paul Slovic— Annals of the American Academy of Politicaland Social Science | 368 | ||
John Sterman— Managing a Nation: The Microcomputer Software Catalog | 375 | ||
University of Washington Urban Ecology Research Lab, Puget Sound Future Scenarios | vi | ||
Scenario: Cost- Benefit Analysis | 421 | ||
Video Discussion: Defining Gains and Losses | 422 | ||
Role- Play Exercise: Negotiating Societal Risk Assessment | 423 | ||
General Instructions | 423 | ||
Confidential Instructions to the Head of the Dairy Cooperative | 425 | ||
Video: Negotiating Societal Risk Assessment | 426 | ||
Student Reflection: Negotiating Societal Risk Assessment | 427 | ||
Written Assignment 3: Environmental Assessment | 430 | ||
First student response to Assignment 3: Strengths, Weaknesses and Policy Implicationsof Environmental Analysis Tools | 431 | ||
Second student response to Assignment 3: Environmental Management Can BeEnhanced through Analytical Tools | 437 | ||
Section IV Collective Action to Solve Environmental Problems | 443 | ||
Introduction | 443 | ||
Readings and Commentaries | 446 | ||
Lawrence Susskind and Jeffrey Cruikshank— “Convening,” “Assigning Roles and Responsibilities,.. | 446 | ||
Ian Shapiro— State of Democratic Theory | 460 | ||
Mark Sagoff— The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment | 481 | ||
Lynn A. Mandarano— Journal of Planning Education and Research | 500 | ||
Lawrence Susskind and Connie Ozawa— Journal of Planning Education and Research | 524 | ||
Eugene A. Rosa, Ortwin Renn and Aaron McCright— Risk Society Revisited: SocialTheory and Governance | 547 | ||
Thomas C. Beierle— Public Participation in Environmental Decisions | 566 | ||
Garrett Hardin— Science | 597 | ||
Elinor Ostrom— Governing the Commons | 611 | ||
Scenario: Public Participation Techniques and Strategies | 638 | ||
Video: Student response to Public Participation Techniques and Strategies scenario | 638 | ||
Scenario: Regional Consensus Building | 639 | ||
Video: Student response to Regional Consensus Building scenario | 639 | ||
Scenario: Environmental Dispute Resolution | 640 | ||
Video: Student response to Environmental Dispute Resolution scenario | 640 | ||
Written Assignment 4: Public Participation and Group Decision- Making | 641 | ||
First student response to Assignment 4: Public Interest and the Consensus Building Approach | 642 | ||
Second student response to Assignment 4: Democracy and Environmental Decision- Making | 646 | ||
Final Exam | 651 | ||
Questions | 651 | ||
Sample Responses to Select Exam Questions | 653 | ||
Conclusions | 661 | ||
End Matter | 665 | ||
Biographies | 665 | ||
References | 666 | ||
Index | 669 |