Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
The Hungarian-born Karl Mannheim became recognized as a pathbreaking sociologist in Germany when he published 'Ideologie und Utopie' (1929) and in the English-speaking world upon publication of 'Ideology and Utopia' (1936), a book in which he explored the possibilities of an approach to political thought by way of sociology of knowledge. Eighty years later, and viewed from varied substance-rich perspectives worldwide, the many facets of Mannheim’s original work are examined in their bearing on numerous other questions in political theory, cultural studies and social analysis. 'The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim' is an international collection of original articles on the classical sociologist and documents the current revitalization of the reception of this social thinker. Using “learning from Mannheim” as their motif, the chapters in this volume favor fresh negotiations with his works, including the writings published posthumously in recent decades.
Karl Mannheim is a classic of sociology. “The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim” helps us to accompany him in his open, experimental thinking, the generation of new questions, the recognition of thought experiments as well as the care for controlling evidence, and his negotiations with colleagues he encounters in his own searches. This is not simply to dismiss the elements brought together by earlier scholars into a challenging composite design, but there cannot be many authors recognized as classical who have characterized the work for which he/she is justly honored as a collection of experimental essays. Sociology of knowledge is a project, not a creed; and “Ideology and Utopia” is a documentation, not a scripture.
After a brief introductory overview of Karl Mannheim’s intellectual career, “The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim” offers fresh commentaries and explorations by an international and presently active group of scholars. As the institutionalized understanding of Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge project was so long shaped by the synthetic reading by the American sociologist Robert K. Merton—a classic in his own right––the companion opens with a careful exposition and critique of that authoritative interpretation. It is followed by a close reading of the considerations that led Mannheim to move beyond the neo-Kantian epistemology of his earlier training to the project of a sociological understanding of critical knowledge. Next to come is a series of studies that marked by perspectives derived from intellectual strategies developed since the breakdown of consensus on the approaches examined in the previous section. In their variety, the studies capture a number of perspectives opened up or expanded by an understanding of Mannheim’s undertaking. The key terms are familiar: self-reflexivity, praxeological sociology, neo-realism, and dramatistic readings of world-views. The angles of vision differ, but they agree in projecting new and important light on Mannheim’s efforts. At the end, attention is focused on some unfamiliar links between Mannheim’s work and current interests: a study of Mannheim’s influence on Hannah Arendt, who knew him as teacher in Heidelberg and Frankfurt; an inquiry into Mannheim’s political thought from the standpoint of contemporary democratic political theory; and an examination of Mannheim’s attention to the status of women and of the work done on these matters under his tutelage by a group of talented women students.
The idea of “The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim” is by no means to dismiss the work for which Mannheim has been best known, but it is to put that work in its particular context, as a multisided agenda rather than as a finished doctrine, to be accepted or rejected. The aim is to learn from Karl Mannheim.
David Kettler is research professor at Bard College, US, and professor emeritus at Trent University, Canada. His publications include five coauthored books on Karl Mannheim.
Volker Meja is professor emeritus at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.
“Kettler and Meja’s Anthem Companion offers timely reflections on some of the main issues in Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge from the point of view of its ‘actuality’ understood as ‘applicability’”.
—Gábor Tverdota (2019) “The anthem companion to Karl Mannheim”, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 6:1, 131–136
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover | Cover 1 | ||
Front Matter | i | ||
Half title | i | ||
Series information | ii | ||
Title page | iii | ||
Copyright information | iv | ||
Table of Contents | v | ||
Chapter Int-10 | 13 | ||
Intoduction: Karl Mannheim as Interlocutor | 1 | ||
Sociology of Knowledge | 2 | ||
Brief Preview | 9 | ||
Note | 10 | ||
Bibliography | 11 | ||
Chapter One Between Ideology and Utopia: Karl Mannheim’s Quest for a Political Synthesis | 13 | ||
Introduction: The Development of the Classical Sociology of Knowledge | 13 | ||
Existentially Connected Knowledge | 17 | ||
The Critical Response | 21 | ||
Thought Styles | 22 | ||
The Synthesis | 24 | ||
Requirements on Knowledge to Be Included in the Synthesis | 25 | ||
The Socially Unattached Intelligentsia | 26 | ||
The Truth Concept | 27 | ||
Concluding Reflections: Reconstructing Political Reason in Modern Society | 29 | ||
Bibliography | 31 | ||
Chapter Two Karl Mannheim and the Realism Debate in Political Theory | 33 | ||
The Realist Critique in Political Theory | 34 | ||
Political “Reality” as Problem, Not a Solution | 37 | ||
Mannheim’s Attack on the Political Philosophy of His Own Moment | 38 | ||
Mannheim’s New Political Science I | 39 | ||
Mannheim’s New Political Science II: Ideology and Political Contexts | 41 | ||
A New Political Science of Political Ideology... | 43 | ||
Conclusion: Political Realism and a Mobile Political Reality | 45 | ||
Notes | 47 | ||
Bibliography | 48 | ||
Chapter Three Mannheim, Mass Society and Democratic Theory | 51 | ||
Introduction | 51 | ||
Mass Society and Democratic Theory | 53 | ||
The Mass and the Elite | 53 | ||
Mass Psychology and Political Theory | 53 | ||
The Crisis of Mass Democracy | 55 | ||
Mannheim’s Discourses on Mass Society and Democracy | 56 | ||
Irrational, Disintegrating Mass Society | 56 | ||
Planning for Freedom as the Third Way | 58 | ||
Mannheim and His Contemporaries in England | 60 | ||
Mannheim, Eliot and the Democratization of Culture | 60 | ||
Mannheim, Lindsay and Democracy as a Way of Life | 62 | ||
Mannheim’s Idea of “the Democratic” and Its Place in Democratic Theory | 64 | ||
Conclusion | 66 | ||
Notes | 67 | ||
Bibliography | 68 | ||
Chapter Four Karl Mannheim and Hannah Arendt on Conduct, Action and Politics | 71 | ||
Max Weber and Action Theory | 71 | ||
The Heidelberg Context | 73 | ||
Politics and Action in Ideology and Utopia | 74 | ||
Arendt’s Triadic Theory of Activity | 79 | ||
Comparing Mannheim and Arendt | 81 | ||
Conclusion | 82 | ||
Notes | 82 | ||
Bibliography | 83 | ||
Chapter Five Karl Mannheim and Women’s Research | 85 | ||
Intellectuals, Women, Classes | 86 | ||
Sociology and Women’s Experiences | 90 | ||
A Case Study: Käthe Truhel and the Two-Term Dialectics of Modernity | 95 | ||
Bureaucracy and the “Crisis” of the State | 97 | ||
The “Social” under Stress | 98 | ||
Social Bureaucracy as a Field of Contestation | 101 | ||
The Limits of Social Bureaucracy | 105 | ||
Käthe Truhel in the Mannheim “Group” | 107 | ||
Notes | 111 | ||
Bibliography | 114 | ||
Chapter Six The Melodrama of Modernity in Karl Mannheim’s Political Theory | 117 | ||
The Problematic and Structure of the Chapter | 117 | ||
The Concept of Melodrama | 119 | ||
Mannheim’s Analysis of Modernity | 120 | ||
Sociology of Knowledge as a Means of Negotiating the Conditions of Knowledge in Modernity | 122 | ||
Conclusions | 127 | ||
Mannheim’s Normative Judgment of Modernity: Positive Potentials and the Recognition of Plurality | 127 | ||
Plurality and the Birth of Optionality: An Intellectual Force against Essentialist Knowledge Claims | 129 | ||
Notes | 133 | ||
Bibliography | 134 | ||
Chapter Seven Historicization and the Sociology of Knowledge* | 137 | ||
Cultural Distancing | 139 | ||
Reproblematizing Historicization | 141 | ||
Historicization in the Sociology of Knowledge | 143 | ||
Notes | 148 | ||
Bibliography | 150 | ||
Chapter Eight Karl Mannheim, T. S. Eliot and Raymond Williams: Cultural Sociology or Cultural Studies? | 153 | ||
Cultural Sociology | 153 | ||
Cultural Studies | 160 | ||
Comparison | 167 | ||
Notes | 168 | ||
Bibliography | 171 | ||
Chapter Ten Praxeological Sociology of Knowledge and Documentary Method: Karl Mannheim’s framing of empirical research | 199 | ||
Sociology of Culture or Knowledge as a “Method” and the Praxeological Attitude of Analysis | 199 | ||
Subjective Meaning and the Construction of Motives versus the “Genetic Attitude” | 204 | ||
Communicative and Conjunctive Knowledge | 206 | ||
Implicit, Atheoretical and Incorporated Knowledge | 206 | ||
Understanding and Interpretation | 208 | ||
Praxeological Sociology of Knowledge, Practical Hermeneutics and Interpretivism | 209 | ||
The Fundamental Constitution of Meaning in Practice and Interaction | 209 | ||
Working Steps of the Documentary Method in Practical Research... | 211 | ||
Reflecting Interpretation and Case-Internal Comparative Analysis | 212 | ||
Typification and Comparative Analysis between Cases | 212 | ||
The Multidimensionality of Typification | 213 | ||
The Interpretation of Pictures, Videos and Films | 214 | ||
Recent Perspectives in Dealing with Mannheim’s Categories | 214 | ||
Notes | 215 | ||
Bibliography | 217 | ||
End Matter | 223 | ||
Contributors | 221 | ||
Index | 223 |