Menu Expand
Implementation of Biological Filtration for the Treatment of Cyanobacterial Metabolites

Implementation of Biological Filtration for the Treatment of Cyanobacterial Metabolites

Emma Sawade | Lionel Ho | Daniel Hoefel | Gayle Newcombe

(2015)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

Specific issues investigated in this project were: Identifying the most effective substrate for optimum biofilm formation, and the range of operating conditions for optimum removals to be achieved; developing a standard suite of laboratory tests, both simulated filtration tests and genetic tests, to identify the potential of an existing filter to remove cyanobacterial metabolites; better understanding of the lag period prior to the onset of degradation of several metabolites; and the feasibility of artificially inoculating or “seeding” filters to enhance removal of the cyanobacterial metabolites. 
This book is co-published with Water Research Australia.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Cover Cover
CONTENTS ix
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Project background 3
1.3 Aims and Objectives 6
1.4 Approach 6
1.4.1 Identification of optimum operating conditions to enable effective biological filtration 6
1.4.1.1 Identification of the most effective substrate for biofilm formation 6
1.4.1.2 Determination of the effect of metabolite concentration on biological degradation 7
1.4.1.3 Effect of temperature on biodegradation of saxitoxins and cylindrospermopsin 7
1.4.1.4 Determination of the effect of hydraulic loading on biological degradation of MIB and geosmin 8
1.4.2 Development of the “Biological Filtration Potential Test” 8
1.4.3 Investigation of potential impacts on the extent of the lag period for MIB and geosmin removal 9
1.4.4 Research Flow diagram 12
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 13
2.1 Cyanobacterial metabolite materials 13
2.2 Analyses 13
2.2.1 Water quality analysis 13
2.2.1.1 Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) and UV absorbance 13
2.2.1.2 MIB and geosmin 13
2.2.1.3 Cyanotoxins 13
2.2.2 Biological activity 14
2.2.2.1 Adenosine triphosphate 14
2.2.2.2 Scanning electron microscopy 14
2.2.2.3 mlrA gene and 16S rRNA abundance 14
2.3 Laboratory-scale filter column testing 14
2.3.1 Identification of the most effective substrate for biofiltration 14
2.3.2 Investigation of potential impacts on the extent of the lag period 15
2.4 Hydraulic loading investigation using pilot-scale filter column testing 16
2.5 Effect of temperature on the biodegradation of saxitoxins and cylindrospermopsin 17
2.6 Biological Filtration Potential Test 17
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 18
3.1 Identification of optimum operating conditions to enable effective biological filtration 18
3.1.1 Identification of the most effective substrate for biofiltration 18
3.1.1.1 Dissolved organic carbon and UV absorbance removal 18
3.1.1.2 Metabolite removal 19
3.1.1.2.1 MIB and geosmin 20
3.1.1.2.2 Cylindrospermopsin, saxitoxin and microcystin 24
3.1.1.3 Measurement of biological activity 3.1.1.3.1 Adenosine triphosphate 28
3.1.1.3.2 Scanning electron microscopy 29
3.1.1.4 Summary and Conclusions 33
3.1.2 Effect of temperature on biodegradation of cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxins 34
3.1.3 Effect of hydraulic loading on biological degradation of MIB and geosmin 36
3.2 Biological Filtration Potential Test 38
3.2.1 SA Water, Morgan Water Treatment Plant 38
3.2.1.1 Laboratory-scale filtration 38
3.2.1.2 Batch experiments, settled water 39
3.2.1.3 Batch experiments, raw water 40
3.2.1.4 Summary 40
3.2.2 Hunter Water, Grahamstown Water Treatment Plant 41
3.2.2.1 Laboratory-scale filtration 41
3.2.2.2 Batch experiments 42
3.2.2.3 Summary 42
3.2.3 Microbiological analysis 43
3.2.4 Comparison of media 44
3.2.5 Summary and conclusions 45
3.3 Investigation of potential impacts on the extent of the lag period for MIB and geosmin removal 46
3.3.1 Scenario 1 – Presence and absence of metabolites 46
3.3.2 Scenario 2 – Seeding with indigenous bacteria 51
3.3.3 Scenario 3 – Presence and absence of degrading bacteria on filter media 53
3.3.4 Summary 56
4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 57
4.1 Summary of Outcomes 57
4.1.1 Identification of optimum operating conditions to enable effective biological filtration 57
4.1.2 Development of the “Biological Filtration Potential Test” 58
4.1.3 Investigation of potential impacts on the extent of the lag period for MIB and geosmin removal 58
4.1.3.1 Scenario 1 – Presence and absence of metabolites 59
4.1.3.2 Scenario 2 – Seeding with indigenous bacteria 59
4.1.3.3 Scenario 3 – Presence and absence of degrading bacteria 60
4.2 Conclusions and recommendations 60
4.2.1 Can your filters achieve successful biological filtration? 61
4.2.2 How can you improve the chances of biological filtration? 61
5 PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ARISING FROM THIS PROJECT* 62
5.1 Peer reviewed journals 62
5.2 Conferences presentations/proceedings 62
5.3 Student reports 62
6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 63
REFERENCES 64
APPENDIX I 67
BIOLOGICAL FILTRATION POTENTIAL (BFP) TEST PROCEDURE 67
APPENDIX II 70
Additional results from BFP test 70
Barwon Water, Wurdee Boluc Water Treatment Plant 70
Laboratory-scale filtration 70
Batch experiments 71
Summary 71
Melbourne Water, Winneke Water Treatment Plant 72
Laboratory-scale filtration 72
Batch experiments 73
Summary 73
Veolia Water, Illawarra Water Treatment Plant 74
Laboratory-scale filtration 74
Batch experiments 75
Summary 75