Menu Expand
Hydrology and Water Law - Bridging the Gap

Hydrology and Water Law - Bridging the Gap

J. Wallace | Patricia Wouters

(2006)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

With "integrated water resources management" (IWRM) the current buzzword in international circles, the real question is: how to operationalise a truly multidisciplinary approach to the effective management of shared watercourses. Based largely on the actual experience of HELP (Hydrology for the Environment, Life and Policy), the overall aim of the book is to produce a series of case studies from around the world (from the Aral Sea to Zimbabwe) that demonstrate how the "gaps" between hydrology, water law and management are actually bridged in practice. Is hydrological data relevant and used in the formulation of national and international water law and policy? Cases cited include examples of where this has happened and been successful or unsuccessful and where this has not happened and led to problems. This will act as a guide to how future water laws and polices can be made more effective via the use of accurate and up to date hydrological information.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Contents 5
Foreword 7
Preface 10
Index 347
1.0 Need for closer links between water science and law 12
1.1\tGLOBAL WATER CRISIS: POLICY CONTEXT, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND LEGAL CHALLENGES OVER CONFLICTS-OF-USE 12
1.2\tRESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGE 16
1.2.1The UNESCO HELP Programme 17
1.2.1.1 Background and global network 17
1.2.1.2 Case studies overview 19
1.3. THE WAY FORWARD 28
1.3.1 What are the common issues? 28
1.3.2 Bridging the gap with a new paradigm 30
REFERENCES 32
2.0 Integrating science and policy for water management 35
2.1\tINTRODUCTION 35
2.2\tPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 36
2.2.1\tPopulation and socio-economic characteristics 38
2.2.2\tWhy is this basin so distinctive? 38
2.2.3\tStakeholder organizations 40
2.2.3.1\t The Upper San Pedro Partnership 40
2.2.3.2\t ARASA 43
2.3\tISSUES AND CHALLENGES: WATER LAW AND POLICY 44
2.3.1 Mexico’s Water Management Framework 44
2.3.2 United States water management framework 45
2.3.2.1 Prior appropriation 45
2.3.2.2 Reasonable use and the Groundwater Management Code 46
2.3.2.3 Other state water management initiatives 47
2.3.2.4 Gila River Adjudication 49
2.3.2.5 Federally reserved water rights 50
2.3.2.6 Clean Water Act 52
2.3.2.7 Endangered Species Act 53
2.3.2.8 National Defense Authorization Act 53
2.4\tBINATIONAL POLICY EFFORTS 54
2.4.1\tIssues and challenges: land-use impacts on water 56
2.4.2\tScience in the Upper San Pedro River Basin 58
2.5\tMAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND IMPLICATION 61
2.6\tCONCLUSION: CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HELP AGENDA 64
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 65
REFERENCES 66
3.0 Water reforms in the Murray Darling Basin: law and policy challenges 71
3.1\tINTRODUCTION 71
3.2 SALIENT FEATURES OF THE MURRAY-DARLING BASIN 73
3.2.1 Size and topography 73
3.2.2 Some key statistics of the Murray-Darling Basin 74
3.2.3 Climate, rainfall and run-off 75
3.2.3 Institutional aspects 76
2.3\tRELATED WATER REFORMS 77
2.4\tEVOLUTION OF WATER LAW IN AUSTRALIA 80
2.4.1 Post-European settlement period 80
2.4.2 Earlier water reforms 81
2.4.3 Current legislative framework for water 81
2.5. CRITIQUE OF WATER LAWS 84
2.6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WATER POLICY AND LAW 86
REFERENCES 87
4.0 Great Lakes management 89
4.1 INTRODUCTION 89
4.1.1 Great Lakes Basin: physical background 90
4.1.1.1 Geologic origins 90
4.1.1.2 Hydrologic flows and climate 92
4.1.2\tPeople and resource use 94
4.1.3\tGreat Lakes Basin: law and management background 96
4.1.3.1\tHistorical water resource law and management 96
4.1.4\tWater data for water law: the evolution of good practice 99
4.1.4.1\tWater science of eutrophication 99
4.1.4.2\tWater law of eutrophication 100
4.1.5\tLake Erie: a focused view of the ecosystem approach 104
4.1.5.1\tMass balance models of eutrophication 105
4.1.5.2\tIncluding Lake Erie hydrological science in Lake Erie policy decisions 106
4.2\tFUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF THE GREAT LAKES 107
4.2.1\tPublic involvement for social and ecosystem benefits: 109
REFERENCES 117
5.0 Water management issues of the Tarim River basin 119
5.1 INTRODUCTION 119
5.2 BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BASIN 121
5.2.1 River regime 121
5.2.2 Climatic and Hydrological Features 122
5.2.3 Socio-economic situation and water use 124
5.3 BASIC WATER AND ECOLOGICAL ISSUES 126
5.3.1 Ecological issues 126
5.3.2 Major water utilisation and management issues 127
5.3.2.1 Inefficient project management and water use 127
5.3.2.2 Water use conflicts 127
5.3.2.3 Lack of integrated planning and ecosystem orientated objectives 128
5.3.2.4 Lack of an effective institution for UWM 128
5.3.2.5 Insufficient monitoring data and information exchange 129
5.4 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 130
5.4.1 Past situation 130
5.4.2 Relevant provisions of 1988 Water Law 130
5.4.2.1 Ownership 131
5.4.2.2 Administration system 131
5.4.2.3 Water resources investigation and assessment 131
5.4.2.4 Water resources planning 132
5.4.2.5 Water utilisation and allocation 132
5.4.2.6 Water environment protection and water pollution prevention 133
5.4.2.7 Water-drawing permit and water pricing systems 133
5.4.2.8 Conflict resolution 134
5.4.3 Xinjiang implementing procedures 134
5.4.3.1 Administration system 134
5.4.3.2 Environmental protection 135
5.4.3.3 Water saving and drought control 135
5.4.4 Tarim Provisions and Regulations 136
5.4.4.1 Interim Provisions 136
5.4.4.2 Tarim Regulations 137
5.5 IMPLICATION OF NEW WATER LAW 141
5.5.1 Unified water management 142
5.5.2 Planning for water resources 142
5.5.3 Allocation of water resources 143
5.5.4 Protection and preservation of ecosystems 143
5.6 ISSUES, AMENDMENTS AND DETAILED PROCEDURES 144
5.6.1 Water administration system 144
5.6.2 Institutional arrangements 145
5.6.2 Water allocation 146
5.6.3 Water-drawing permit system and water pricing 147
5.6.4 Hydraulic project management 147
5.6.5 Participation 148
5.6.6 Monitoring system and information exchange 149
5.7 CONCLUSION 150
REFERENCES 151
List of Major Laws and Regulations 152
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 152
ACRONYMS 153
6.1 INTRODUCTION 154
6.2\tGENERAL DESCRIPTION OF CANAL AREA 155
6.2.1\tLocation 155
6.2.2\tClimate 156
6.2.3\tHydrology 157
6.3\tGENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CANAL’S MAIN FEATURES 157
6.3.1\tDams 158
6.4 PANAMA CANAL WATERSHED EASTERN REGION WATER USES 159
6.5 WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT OF THE PANAMA CANAL 160
6.5.1 Introduction to ACP water management activities 160
6.5.2 ACP water management program scope and effect 160
6.5.3 Difficulties in ACP water management 161
6.5.4 Fighting ‘El Niño’ 162
6.5.5 Hydrological reliability: present and future 163
6.6\tINTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 163
6.6.1 Current watershed situation 164
6.6.2 Regulations and inter-institutional coordination 164
6.6.3 The ‘human being’ in the Panama Canal watershed 165
6.6.4. Management information 166
6.6.5 Environmental education 166
6.6.6 Interinstitutional commission 167
6.7 PROPOSED MODEL 167
6.8 CONCLUSIONS 167
REFERENCES 169
7.0 Ghanaian water reforms 170
7.1\tINTRODUCTION 170
7.2\tGHANA: SOME BASIC INFORMATION 174
7.3\tWATER POLICY AND WATER LAW IN GHANA 177
7.3.1\tWater resource management in Ghana before the reform process 178
7.3.1.1\tTraditional water resource management 178
7.3.1.2\tPast legal framework of water resource management 179
7.3.2\tThe Ghanaian water reform process 181
7.3.2.1\tCoordinating the water sector: the Water Resource Commission 181
7.3.2.2\tData availability and data gaps 185
7.3.2.3\tAllocating and billing of water rights: water use regulations and raw water charges 187
7.3.2.4\tImplementing water reforms at the local level: the river basin pilot projects 190
7.4\tTRANSBOUNDARY WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 194
7.5\tSECTORAL WATER REFORM PROCESSES IN GHANA 198
7.5.1\tUrban privatisation and rural popular participation: drinking water supplies 198
7.6\tWATER REFORMS AND HYDROLOGICAL DATA: THE GHANAIAN EXPERIENCE 201
REFERENCES 205
Statutes 207
ACRONYMS 207
8.0 Aral Sea basin: science, policy and practice 209
8.1 INTRODUCTION 209
8.2\tBACKGROUND 210
8.3\tPOLICY AND LEGISLATIVE PROPERTIES 212
8.4\tBASELINE INFORMATION AVAILABILITY 214
8.4.1\tThe Water Use and Farm Management Survey (WUFMAS) and ‘best practices’ 214
8.4.2\tAccess to data 215
8.4.3\tExisting models 215
8.5\tHYDROLOGICAL AND WATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES 216
8.5.1\tWater quantity and quality 216
8.5.2\tWater storage and control facilities 217
8.5.3\tWater use 217
8.5.4\tIrrigation and drainage infrastructure 218
8.5.5\tEnvironmental issues 218
8.5.6\tLivelihoods issues 218
8.5.7\tPolicy and legislation issues 219
8.5.8\tLinks to the UNESCO HELP initiative 220
8.6\tINSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND CAPACITY BUILDING ISSUES 221
8.7\tFUTURE HELP PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES IN THE ARAL SEA BASIN 225
8.7.1\tCapacity building, training and education 226
8.7.2\tMonitoring and evaluation 226
8.8\tCONCLUSIONS 227
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: SUPPORTING PARTNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS 227
9.0 Information use and water resources laws and policies in Ecuador 229
9.1\tINTRODUCTION 229
9.2\tINSTITUTIONS, ORGANIZATIONS AND AVAILABLE INFORMATION FOR WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 231
9.2.1\tWater resources in Ecuador 231
9.2.2 Water law: some legal considerations 235
9.2.3 Water organizations 237
9.2.4 Hydrological information 239
9.2.5 Policy and law design 241
9.2.6 Governance structures for allocating water resources 242
9.2.6.1 Potable water and sanitation 242
9.2.6.2 Irrigation 242
9.2.6.3 Hydroelectricity 243
9.2.6.4 Other uses 243
9.3. CASE STUDY: THE CHAGUANA RIVER BASIN 244
9.3.1 Problem description and site selection 244
9.3.2 Components of the assessment 246
9.3.3 Data gathering process 246
9.3.4 Geographic Information Systems as a tool for environmental assessment 248
9.4. CASE STUDY: THE PENINSULA OF SANTA ELENA 250
9.4.1 Problem description 250
9.4.2 Components of the tool 251
9.4.3 Data gathering process 254
9.4.4 Information presentation 254
9.5. CONCLUSIONS 254
ACRONYMS 255
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 256
REFERENCES 256
10.0 Transboundary groundwater resources in Palestine 258
10.1\tINTRODUCTION 258
10.2\tBACKGROUND 260
10.2.1\t\tLocation 260
10.2.2\tGeographic and climatic conditions 261
10.2.3\tWater availability in the West Bank 261
10.2.3.1Groundwater 261
10.2.3.2 Wadis 262
10.2.3.3 The Jordan River system 262
10.2.4\tSocio-economic conditions 263
10.2.4.1\t Population 263
10.2.4.2 Socio-economic conditions 264
10.2.4.3 Water and economic development in Palestine 264
10.2.5\tWater stakeholders 265
10.2.5.1\t Background 265
10.2.5.2\t Service provision institutions 265
10.2.5.3\t Regulatory institutions 266
10.2.5.4\t Plans for water sector reform 267
10.2.6\t Key water issues 268
10.2.6.1\t Access to water resources and sanitation 268
10.2.6.2\t Deteriorated infrastructure and services 268
10.2.6.3 Lack of cooperation and coordination and weakness of existing joint management institutions 268
10.2.6.4\t Lack of financial resources and donor coordination 269
10.3\tHYDROLOGICAL ISSUES 269
10.3.1\tGeneral description of the mountain aquifer 269
10.3.2 Drainage basins in the WB 270
10.3.3 Hydrogeological characteristics 271
10.3.4 Annual recharge and utilisations 271
10.3.5 Hydrogeology and recharge regime 271
10.3.6 Water quality 272
10.3.7 Hydrogeological investigations and flow models 273
10.4\tHYDROLOGICAL CHALLENGES 273
10.4.1 Over-pumping 273
10.4.2 Water quality and pollution problems 274
10.4.3 Available alternatives for development 274
10.4.3.1 Fresh water resources 274
10.4.3.2 Non-conventional resources 275
10.5\tLEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES 275
10.5.1 International level 275
10.5.2 National level 276
10.6\tLEGAL AND POLICY CHALLENGES 276
10.6.1 International level 276
10.6.1.1 Identify the problem 276
10.6.1.2 Agree on interests and not positions 277
10.6.1.3 Create options for mutual benefits 278
10.6.1.4 Joint assessment of legal entitlement from the mountain aquifer 279
10.6.1.5 Collaboration and joint projects 280
10.6.1.6 Treaty formulation 281
10.6.2 National level 285
10.6.2.1 Build Palestine’s water institutions and promote good governance 285
10.6.2.2 Strengthen the regulatory and environmental framework 285
10.6.2.3 Proceed with the water sector reform 285
10.6.2.4 Strengthen the management and technical capacities 286
10.6.2.5 Improve knowledge on transboundary groundwater 286
10.6.2.6 Harmonise national laws with Israel pertaining to transboundary groundwater 286
10.6.2.7 Create drainage basin authorities/boards 287
10.7\tCONCLUSIONS 287
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 288
REFERENCES 290
11.0 River basin planning in Scotland and the EC 291
11.1 \tINTRODUCTION 291
11.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 292
11.2.1 Biophysical 292
11.2.2 Socio-economic 292
11.2.3 Water stakeholders 293
11.2.4 Key water issues 293
11.3 SCIENTIFIC ISSUES 295
11.3.1 Data quantity / quality 295
11.3.2 Scientific challenges 296
11.4 POLICY AND LAW ISSUES 297
11.4.1 Legal and policy regimes 297
11.4.1.1 The Water Framework Directive 297
11.4.1.2 The legal and policy regime in Scotland 300
11.4.1.3\tLegal and policy challenges 304
ACRONYMS 306
REFERENCES 306
12.0 Hydrological information in water law and policy: New Zealand 308
12.1\tINTRODUCTION 308
12.2\tNZ LEGISLATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR WATER MANAGEMENT 310
12.3\tTHE ROLE OF HYDROLOGICAL INFORMATION IN WATER POLICY 319
12.4\tNEW ZEALAND EXAMPLES OF THE APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL DATA IN WATER POLICY 320
12.4.1\t\tWater Allocation Limits 321
12.4.2\tEnvironmental flows 324
12.4.3\tLand-cover effects on water yield 325
12.4.4\t\tSynthesis 329
12.5\tIMPROVING NEW ZEALAND WATER MANAGEMENT USING HYDROLOGICAL DATA 331
12.6\tHYDROLOGICAL INFORMATION NEEDS FOR POLICY AND LAW 333
12.7\tCASE STUDY: HYDROLOGICAL INFORMATION FOR WATER ALLOCATION IN THE MOTUEKA CATCHMENT 334
12.7.1\tMotueka Catchment water policy 336
12.8\tSUMMARY 341
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 342
REFERENCES 342