Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
The European DayWater project has developed a prototype of an Adaptive Decision Support System (ADSS) related to urban stormwater pollution source control. The DayWater ADSS greatly facilitates decision-making for stormwater source control, which is currently impeded by the large number of stakeholders involved and by the necessary multidisciplinary knowledge. This book presents the results of this project, providing new insights into both technical and management issues. The main objectives of its technical chapters are pollution source control modelling, risk and impact assessment, and evaluation and comparison of best management practices. It also covers management aspects, such as the analysis of the decision-making processes in stormwater source control, at a European scale, and stormwater management strategies in general.
The combination of scientific-technical and socio-managerial knowledge, with the strong cooperation of numerous end-users, reflects the innovative character of this book which includes actual applications of the ADSS prototype in significant case studies. DayWater: an Adaptive Decision Support System for Urban Stormwater Management contains 26 chapters collectively prepared by DayWater scientific partners and end-users associated with this European Research and Development project.
It includes:
- A general presentation of the DayWater Adaptive Decision Support System (ADSS) structure and operation modes
- A detailed description of the major components of this ADSS prototype
- The assessment of its components in significant case studies in France, Germany and Sweden
- The proceedings of the International Conference on Decision Support Systems for Integrated Urban Water Management, held in Paris on 3-4 November 2005.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Contents | |||
Foreword | |||
Authors | |||
Chapter 1: DayWater: the challenge to develop an Adaptive Decision Support System for urban stormwater source control | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
ADSS DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE | |||
DayWater project structure | |||
DayWater consortium | |||
End-user involvement | |||
Initial core end-user questionnaires | |||
Testing of ADSS components | |||
Testing of global ADSS | |||
ADSS DEVELOPMENT | |||
Consideration of end-user needs | |||
Common definition of ADSS structure and functionalities | |||
Development of ADSS components | |||
Interest in decision-making procedures in urban stormwater management | |||
Future actions | |||
ADAPTIVE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM MAJOR CHARACTERISTICS | |||
ADSS functions | |||
Structure of the ADSS | |||
Tools associated to the ADSS | |||
Urban Dynamics | |||
Best Management Practices | |||
Pollutants | |||
Risk and vulnerability | |||
Multi-criteria comparator (MCC) and Matrix of Alternatives (MoA) | |||
Tools | |||
FINAL DAYWATER CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Part 1: Structure of the Adaptive Decision Support System | |||
Chapter 2: Adaptive DSS – a new kind of DSS | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
BASIC CONCEPTS OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM | |||
APPLICATIONS OF DSS IN THE FIELD OF WATER MANAGEMENT | |||
DSS EUREG – Czech case | |||
WATSIDE: a methodology for WATer Supply Integrated Development | |||
ADAPTIVE DSS IN FRAME OF DAYWATER PROJECT | |||
General concept of ADSS | |||
Basic ADSS features | |||
ADSS Components and functions | |||
Modes of ADSS usage | |||
Free ADSS mode | |||
Smart (“semi”) guided ADSS mode | |||
Guided ADSS mode | |||
ADSS users and User rights | |||
Compliance with basic ADSS concept | |||
Library function | |||
Management function | |||
Analysis function | |||
Communication function | |||
Role of ADSS adaptability | |||
Adaptability in personalising the HYDROPOLIS | |||
Adaptability in template questionnaire development | |||
Adaptability in user navigation, during the consultation process, in guided mode | |||
Adaptability in ADSS data updates | |||
Adaptability in building personal archives | |||
ADSS Software architecture | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 3: Welcome to Hydropolis | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTIES IN DECISION SUPPORT | |||
Two types of uncertainties | |||
The A of ADSS | |||
Problems in four quadrants | |||
Coping with uncertainties: two level approach | |||
FUNCTIONALITIES OF HYDROPOLIS | |||
Basic principles of Hydropolis | |||
Tiles | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 4: DayWater ADSS guided tour: a feature for the Decision Support System adaptability to its user | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
ADSS GUIDED MODE STRUCTURE | |||
Knowledge trees | |||
Basic features and functions of knowledge trees | |||
USING KNOWLEDGE TREES FOR DECISION MAKING PROCESS | |||
Negotiation concept in ADSS | |||
Water Expert engine | |||
Matrix of alternatives | |||
Analysing the multiple stakeholder views | |||
Guided tour | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 5: Libraries | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
CASE STUDIES (CS) DATABASE | |||
Purpose of the CS database | |||
User’s involvement in the construction of the CS database | |||
Fields of the CS database | |||
POLICY INSTRUMENTS INFORMATION (PII) DATABASE | |||
How to select the information within the PII database? | |||
STAKE HOLDERS (SH) DATABASE | |||
KEY TERMS (KT) LIST | |||
CRITERIA AND INDICATORS (CI) LIST | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
Part 2: Tools associated to the Adaptive Decision Support | |||
Chapter 6: Urban dynamics | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
A DEFINITION OF URBAN DYNAMICS | |||
ASPECTS OF WATER | |||
Mapping perceptions and valuation | |||
Aspects of water in Hydropolis ADSS | |||
COPING WITH URBAN DYNAMICS | |||
Three archetypes in urban water management | |||
Basic water management: static approach | |||
Functional water management: frozen dynamics | |||
Contextual water management: from optimization to adaptation | |||
Ambition Reflection | |||
IMPLEMENTATION AS STARTING POINT | |||
Working in parallel | |||
Switching between scales | |||
Learning by doing | |||
Snowball effect | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 7: Assessment criteria for sustainable urban draniage systems | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
SELECTION OF STORMWATER CONTROL OPTIONS | |||
Identification of criteria | |||
Identification of indicators and benchmarks | |||
Short description of the Technical criterion | |||
Detailed consideration of the Environmental criterion | |||
Receiving water volume impact | |||
Receiving water quality impact | |||
Receiving water ecological impact | |||
Overview of remaining identified criteria and indicators | |||
Operation and maintenance criterion | |||
Maintenance and servicing requirements | |||
System reliability and durability | |||
Social and urban community benefits | |||
Public health and safety risks | |||
Sustainable development potential | |||
Public/community information and awareness | |||
Amenity and aesthetics | |||
Economic costs | |||
Life cycle costs | |||
Long term affordability | |||
Legal and urban planning | |||
Adoption status | |||
Building development issues and stormwater regulations | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 8: The Best Management Practice catalogue developed within the DayWater project | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
USING THE BMP CATALOGUE | |||
BMP CHARACTERISTICS | |||
BMP PERFORMANCE | |||
BMP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | |||
BMP PHOTOGRAPHS | |||
BMP EXAMPLE TYPES | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 9: The DayWater Multi-Criteria Comparator | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACHES FOR WATER MANAGEMENT | |||
THE DAYWATER MCC APPROACH | |||
USING THE DAYWATER MCC PERFORMANCE MATRIX | |||
MCC Instructions | |||
Site screening characteristics | |||
MCC performance matrix | |||
Applying weights | |||
Outcomes | |||
CONCLUSION: APPLICATION OF THE DAYWATER MCC AS AN URBAN STORMWATER DECISION SUPPORT TOOL | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 10: Best Management Practice costing: methodologies for lifecycle cost assessment | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
LIFECYCLE COST ANALYSIS | |||
COST FUNCTIONS | |||
DERIVING EQUIVALENT LIFETIME COSTS | |||
LIFETIME COSTING | |||
COST-EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 11: Selection of priority pollutants in the DayWater project | |||
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES | |||
METHODOLOGY | |||
Step 1. Source characterisation | |||
Step 2. Recipient, exposure object and criteria identification | |||
Step 3. Hazard and problem identification | |||
Step 4. Hazard assessment | |||
Step 5. Expert judgement | |||
THE DAYWATER SSPP-LIST | |||
Step 1. Source characterization | |||
Step 2. Recipient, exposure object and criteria identification | |||
Step 3. Hazard and Problem Identification | |||
Step 4. Hazard assessment | |||
Step 5. Expert judgment | |||
Discussion | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 12: Risk and vulnerability | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
RISK INDICATORS | |||
HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY SCREENING | |||
IMPLICATIONS OF UNCERTAINTY FOR MANAGEMENT | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 13: Flood Vulnerability Assessment Tool (FVAT) | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
DEALING WITH VULNERABILITY | |||
The three complexity aspects of vulnerability | |||
A brief literature review of vulnerability evaluation | |||
A NEW SUPPORT TOOL FOR FLOOD VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS | |||
Description of the support tool | |||
Methodological aspects for indicator identification | |||
Organisation and use of the indicators | |||
Organisation of the tree and representation of interactions | |||
DISCUSSION | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 14: Source and flux modelling in urban stormwater management (STORM/SEWSYS): application examples in Germany and Sweden | |||
SOURCE AND FLUX MODELLING CONCEPT | |||
The model STORM | |||
The model SEWSYS | |||
The model STORM/SEWSYS – an SFM tool | |||
The model input database | |||
MODEL OUTPUTS AND NEW POSSIBILITIES | |||
INTERACTION WITH THE DAYWATER ADSS | |||
APPLICATIONS | |||
The Wupper case | |||
Wupperverband | |||
Project area | |||
Objectives | |||
The six Wupper models | |||
Simulation model Leverkusen | |||
Simulation model Wuppertal | |||
Simulation model Burg | |||
An example: the STORM/SEWSYS Model for the catchment area of WWTP Leverkusen | |||
Results | |||
The Hammarby Sjöstad case | |||
GIS analysis | |||
STORM/SEWSYS model | |||
Results | |||
CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL REMARKS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 15: Integrated planning of stormwater infiltration measures: Flext A Tool for Scenario Development and Vulnerability Mapping, including Wupper River Case Study | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
Integrated planning of on-site stormwater management measures | |||
New concept on Urban Stormwater Management | |||
Integrated planning of on-site stormwater management measures in whole urban stormwater drainage system | |||
Decentralised water management planning aiming to preventive flood control in river watershed | |||
METHODOLOGY FOR THE FLEXT TOOL DEVELOPMENT | |||
Why a knowledge-based system is applied? | |||
Development of an GIS integrable Expert System Tool | |||
Development of a knowledge base for selection of on-site rainwater infiltration measures | |||
Basic components of an expert system | |||
Characteristics of the Flext tool | |||
INTEGRATION OF FLEXT INTO GIS PLATFORM | |||
Concept of integration of an ES into GIS platform | |||
Running procedure of the Flext integrated model | |||
DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSPARENT SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ON-SITE URBAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING: FLEXT | |||
Classification of affecting factors of decentralised stormwater management | |||
Factors affecting on-site water retention | |||
Factors concerning pollution dispersion | |||
Factors affecting the construction of on-site infiltration measures | |||
Factors concerning other utilisation of the site or aesthetics | |||
Social and economic factors | |||
CASE STUDY: BASIN OF THE WUPPER RIVER | |||
Introduction | |||
Application of the ES in combination with GIS platform | |||
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION | |||
Further application of Flext | |||
Limitations and further extension | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Part 3: Applications of Adaptive Decision Support | |||
Chapter 16: DayWater ADSS: an incentive for action but a source of questions - an end-user account of the prototype development | |||
‘SYNDICAT MIXTE MARNE VIVE’: AN ORIGINAL LOCAL WATER INSTITUTION TACKLING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ISSUES | |||
Presentation of the ‘Syndicat Marne Vive’ | |||
The need to manage urban stormwater | |||
What help is needed for the engineer, technician or elected official faced with stormwater management problems? | |||
A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR URBAN STORMWATER SOURCE CONTROL | |||
The DayWater project is launched: expectations of possible users are high | |||
User comments during the development of the ADSS | |||
First comment: the difficulty to describe one’s need or profile | |||
Second comment: facing the complexity | |||
Scientific knowledge versus user needs and practical experience: two different languages? | |||
CONCLUSION: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF THE DAYWATER ADSS? | |||
The ADSS is a prototype | |||
What improvements could be made in the ADSS? | |||
How can the ADSS be improved and maintained? | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 17: Factors of sucess and failure in the implementation of urban stormwater source control measures: the Nijmegen municipality experience | |||
Part 4: Related research in stormwater management | |||
Chapter 20: Application of a battery of biotests for toxicity characterization of urban stormwater | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
MATERIALS AND METHODS | |||
Field site, sampling and chemical characterization | |||
Whole sample tests | |||
Toxicity tests | |||
Toxicity identification evaluation procedures | |||
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | |||
Sample characteristics | |||
Toxicity of stormwater samples | |||
CONCLUSION: APPLICATION OF BIOTESTS FOR VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF URBAN STORMWATER | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 21: Development of a distributed hydrological model for urban catchments | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
MORPHOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CATCHMENT IN MUHDI | |||
DESCRIPTION OF THE HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN THE MODEL | |||
APPLICATION OF THE MODEL TO URBAN CATCHMENTS | |||
Principles | |||
Case study | |||
Application of the model on Rezé catchment | |||
FIRST RESULTS | |||
Simulation of a rainfall event | |||
Simulation of runoff flows | |||
Simulation of saturation levels | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 22: Stormwater in cold climates | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
DEFINITIONS OF COLD CLIMATE | |||
SNOWMELT PROCESSES AND RUNOFF | |||
STORMWATER QUALITY IN COLD CLIMATES | |||
Sources for pollutants in snow and road runoff | |||
Slipperiness control | |||
Transport of stormwater pollutants | |||
STORMWATER SOURCE CONTROL IN A COLD CLIMATE | |||
Structural BMPs | |||
Swales/Filter strips | |||
Infiltration systems | |||
Porous pavement/asphalt | |||
Ponds and wetlands | |||
Oil and grit separators | |||
Gully pots | |||
Non-structural BMPs | |||
Street cleaning | |||
Snow handling practices | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Part 5: Related Decision Support Systems | |||
Chapter 23: The PETUS project: a step to fill the gap between theory and practice of urban sustainability | |||
THE PETUS PROJECT: PRESENTATION | |||
The background | |||
The PETUS framework | |||
The PETUS project | |||
Project methodology | |||
OVERVIEW OF PETUS FRAMEWORK | |||
The ‘Database’ | |||
Sector description | |||
Case Studies | |||
Tools | |||
Legislation | |||
Guidance part | |||
The PETUS matrix | |||
DISCUSSION OF MAJOR RESULTS OBTAINED DURING THE PROJECT | |||
Literature review | |||
Case studies review | |||
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PETUS FRAMEWORK | |||
PETUS testing | |||
PETUS for whom? | |||
CONCLUSION | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 24: Risk analysis and impact assessment of urban stormwater – with emphasis on the EU – Water Framework Directive | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
THE EUROPEAN WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (EU – WFD) | |||
Implementation of the WFD - case study Austria | |||
POLLUTION OF URBAN RUNOFF | |||
IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT | |||
RECEIVING WATER CLASSIFICATION | |||
Sensitivity to increase of biodegradable matter | |||
Sensitivity to plant nutrients | |||
Sensitivity to acute toxic effects | |||
Morphological sensitivity | |||
Sensitivity to accumulation of persistent toxics | |||
LIMITS | |||
Ambient water quality limits | |||
Infiltration | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Chapter 25: Criteria and indicators in delivering sustainable water systems: from Sustainable Water Asset Resource Decisions (SWARD) to Water cycle management for New Developments (WaND) | |||
INTRODUCTION | |||
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR WATER MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING | |||
The ‘Think Before You Flush’ (TBYF) campaign | |||
SWARD – development of core criteria | |||
Criteria development for stormwater drainage | |||
IMPEDIMENTS TO THE INCLUSION OF SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS WITHIN WATER MANAGEMENT | |||
SUSTAINABLE URBAN ENVIRONMENTS AND THE WAND CONSORTIUM | |||
CONCLUSIONS | |||
REFERENCES | |||
Part 6: Summary and prospective | |||
Chapter 26: DayWater: summary and future development | |||
DAYWATER SUMMARY | |||
Problem formulation | |||
Innovative objectives (scientific & technical) | |||
Access to the DayWater ADSS | |||
Stormwater problem identification and analysis | |||
Tools to support project construction | |||
BMP design and comparison of alternative solutions and their respective impacts | |||
Stakeholder experiences | |||
CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES | |||
REFERENCES |