BOOK
Integrating Water Resources Management
Geoffrey D. Gooch | Alistair Rieu-Clarke | Per Stalnacke
(2010)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
The strategy and methodology for improved IWRM project, (STRIVER) has developed interdisciplinary methods to assess and implement IWRM. Based on the development of a multidisciplinary knowledge base assessment in all case studies (policy, social and natural sciences) and an early stage development of IWRM conceptual framework, this book investigates IWRM in the four selected twinned catchments covering six countries in Europe and Asia.
Twinning activities based on a problem-based approach have been performed in four case river basins: Tunga Bahdra (2 states in India), Sesan (Vietnam/Cambodia), Glomma (Norway), Tejo/Tagus (Spain/Portugal). The problems covered are water regimes in transboundary regulated rivers; environmental flow; land and water use interaction; and pollution under the IWRM framework. The research used sub-basins of each river basin in all cases to allow more detailed studies and easier integration of all stakeholders, for transferability purposes. Integrating Water Resources Management develops guidelines for interdisciplinary methods to assess and implement IWRM assesses the transferability of case study results enhances the dialogue between decision-makers, stakeholders and scientists disseminates data and information to stakeholders to promote participatory planning and integrated decision-making, taking adequate account of the rights of poor people and gender roles
More information about the book can be found on the Water Wiki in an article written by the author here: http://www.iwawaterwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Articles/IntegratingWaterResourcesManagement
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Half title | 1 | ||
Title | 3 | ||
Copyright | 4 | ||
Contents | 5 | ||
Contributors | 11 | ||
Preface | 15 | ||
Chapter 1: STRIVER in the context of Integrated Water Resources Management | 17 | ||
1.1 IWRM – AN EVOLVING CONCEPT AND ITS BARRIERS | 17 | ||
1.2 THE OVERALL AIM AND ROLE OF STRIVER | 18 | ||
1.3 THE STRIVER CASE STUDY BASINS | 19 | ||
1.4 FOCUS AREAS WITHIN STRIVER | 20 | ||
1.4.1 Multidisciplinary baseline assessment and initial stakeholder dialogue | 21 | ||
1.4.2 IWRM assessment | 21 | ||
1.4.3 A problem-based approach | 23 | ||
1.4.3.1 Transboundary water regimes in highly regulated rivers (Sesan and Tagus) | 23 | ||
1.4.3.2 Water pollution and models (Tungabhadra and Glomma) | 23 | ||
1.4.3.3 Environmental Flow (Sesan and Glomma) | 23 | ||
1.4.3.4 Land and water use interactions (Tungabhadra and Tagus) | 24 | ||
1.4.3.5 Guidance and strategies for decision support and River Basin management plans in case basins | 24 | ||
1.5 CHAPTER OUTLINE AND APPROACH | 24 | ||
1.6 REFERENCES | 26 | ||
Chapter 2: IWRM status in the Glomma River basin | 29 | ||
2.1 INTRODUCTION | 29 | ||
2.2 THE GLOMMA RIVER BASIN AND ITS PRESSURES | 30 | ||
2.3 IWRM STATUS IN GLOMMA | 32 | ||
2.3.1 Protection of the catchment | 32 | ||
2.3.1.1 The successful Lake Mjøsa abatement programme | 33 | ||
2.3.1.2 The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) | 34 | ||
2.3.2 Measures to ensure efficient use of water | 34 | ||
2.3.3 Institutional analysis | 35 | ||
2.3.3.1 The water governance system in the Glomma and the integration principle | 35 | ||
2.3.3.2 Institutional Integration | 36 | ||
2.3.3.3 Public participation, access to information and decision making | 37 | ||
2.3.4 Capacity building in the Glomma River basin | 38 | ||
2.3.5 Transboundary issues and the Glomma River | 38 | ||
2.4 FINAL REMARKS | 38 | ||
2.5 REFERENCES | 39 | ||
Chapter 3: Modeling water nutrient pollution with stakeholders involvement | 41 | ||
3.1 INTRODUCTION | 41 | ||
3.2 DATA CONSTRUCTION AND MODEL SET-UP | 42 | ||
3.2.1 Data availability | 42 | ||
3.2.2 Modeling set-up | 42 | ||
3.2.2.1 Spatial discretisation | 42 | ||
3.2.2.2 Land cover and crop types | 42 | ||
3.2.2.3 Soils | 43 | ||
3.2.2.4 Weather information | 44 | ||
3.2.2.5 Point sources and scattered dwellings | 44 | ||
3.2.2.6 Fertilizer applications and management operations | 44 | ||
3.3 MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION | 45 | ||
3.3.1 Water flow | 45 | ||
3.3.2 Water quality | 45 | ||
3.4 ANALYSIS OF SCENARIOS | 46 | ||
3.4.1 Development of scenarios | 46 | ||
3.4.2 Results of scenarios | 47 | ||
3.4.2.1 Scenario 1 – Reduced ploughing | 47 | ||
3.4.2.2 Scenario 2 – Optimal fertilization | 47 | ||
3.4.2.3 Scenario 3 – Increase in vegetables/berry production | 48 | ||
3.5 ADVANTAGES OF INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS | 48 | ||
3.6 CONCLUSIONS | 49 | ||
3.7 REFERENCES | 49 | ||
Chapter 4: Pressure-impact multi-criteria environmental flow analysis: Application in the Øyeren delta, Glomma River basin, Norway | 51 | ||
4.1 INTRODUCTION | 51 | ||
4.2 TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO EXPERT ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL OR COMPENSATION FLOW IN NORWAY | 52 | ||
4.3 OVERVIEW OF PIMCEFA | 53 | ||
4.4 THE APPLICATION OF PIMCEFA TO ØYEREN | 54 | ||
4.4.1 Stakeholders identify range of alternatives | 54 | ||
4.4.2 Experts identify impacts and their indicators | 55 | ||
4.4.3 Experts identify critical river reaches and time periods | 56 | ||
4.4.4 Experts construct pressure-impact curves | 57 | ||
4.4.5 Consultant inputs alternative-impacts matrix for critical reaches and periods | 58 | ||
4.4.6 Dealing with uncertain expert judgment | 58 | ||
4.4.7 Consultant generates multi-criteria ranking using software | 59 | ||
4.4.8 Stakeholders compare importance of impacts | 60 | ||
4.4.9 Hydropower producers calculate production level at different flow alternatives | 60 | ||
4.4.10 Stakeholders/policy-makers weigh cost of foregone hydropower against optimal multiple use environmental flow alternatives | 61 | ||
4.5 OTHER MULTI CRITERIA APPROACHES TO ESTABLISHING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW | 61 | ||
4.6 CONCLUSIONS – POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE METHODOLOGY | 63 | ||
4.7 REFERENCES | 64 | ||
Chapter 5: IWRM status in the Tagus River basin | 65 | ||
5.1 INTRODUCTION | 65 | ||
5.2 THE TAGUS RIVER BASIN | 65 | ||
5.3 WATER USES AND PRESSURES IN THE BASIN | 65 | ||
5.4 WATER CONFLICTS IN THE TAGUS BASIN | 67 | ||
5.5 THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IWRM IN THE TAGUS BASIN | 68 | ||
5.5.1 Transboundary arrangements | 68 | ||
5.5.2 Institutional arrangements at the national level | 69 | ||
5.5.2.1 Spain | 69 | ||
5.5.2.2 Portugal | 70 | ||
5.5.3 Stakeholder participation in the Tagus River basin | 71 | ||
5.6 KEY CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STRENGTHENING IWRM | 71 | ||
5.6.1 Water availability and allocation issues | 71 | ||
5.6.2 Water quality and ecological status | 73 | ||
5.6.3 Stakeholder participation in water management | 73 | ||
5.6.4 Legal and institutional aspects | 74 | ||
5.7 REFERENCES | 74 | ||
Chapter 6: The legal framework for the Tagus River basin | 77 | ||
6.1 INTRODUCTION | 77 | ||
6.2 INTERNATIONAL, REGIONAL AND BI-LATERAL COMMITMENTS | 77 | ||
6.2.1 Multilateral agreements | 77 | ||
6.2.2 Regional agreements – the UN ECE | 78 | ||
6.2.3 Regional agreements – the EC | 79 | ||
6.2.4 Bi-lateral agreements | 79 | ||
6.3 NATIONAL LAWS | 80 | ||
6.3.1 Law and policy development | 81 | ||
6.3.2 Water allocation and prioritization measures | 81 | ||
6.3.3 Protection of aquatic ecosystems | 81 | ||
6.3.4 Broader governance arrangements that influence IWRM law | 81 | ||
6.3.4.1 Access to information | 82 | ||
6.3.4.2 Participation in decision-making | 83 | ||
6.3.4.3 Access to justice | 83 | ||
6.3.5 Challenges in implementing IWRM related law | 84 | ||
6.4 REFERENCES | 85 | ||
Chapter 7: Innovative technology and institutional options in Rainfed and irrigated agriculture in the Tagus basin | 87 | ||
7.1 INTRODUCTION | 87 | ||
7.2 RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN THE TAGUS BASIN | 88 | ||
7.3 THE DEVELOPMENT OF IRRIGATION AGRICULTURE | 89 | ||
7.4 PROMISING OPTIONS IN IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE | 93 | ||
7.5 CONCLUSIONS | 96 | ||
7.6 REFERENCES | 96 | ||
Chapter 8: IWRM status in the Tungabhadra sub-basin | 99 | ||
8.1 INTRODUCTION | 99 | ||
8.2 THE CONTEXT OF THE TUNGABHADRA BASIN | 100 | ||
8.3 AN ASSESSMENT OF IWRM WITHIN THE TUNGABHADRA | 101 | ||
8.3.1 Protection of the catchment and the environment | 101 | ||
8.3.2 Measures to ensure efficient and equitable use of water | 103 | ||
8.3.3 Institutional analysis and stakeholder involvement in water management | 103 | ||
8.3.3.1 Institutional structure | 103 | ||
8.3.3.2 Access to information for stakeholders | 104 | ||
8.3.3.3 Decision-making amongst stakeholders | 105 | ||
8.3.4 Capacity building | 105 | ||
8.3.5 Transboundary issues | 106 | ||
8.4 CONCLUSION | 106 | ||
8.5 REFERENCES | 106 | ||
Chapter 9: Integrating tanks into the larger waterscape in the Tungabhadra | 109 | ||
9.1 INTRODUCTION | 109 | ||
9.2 CHANGING WATERSCAPES IN THE TUNGABHADRA SUB-BASIN | 109 | ||
9.2.1 Changing historical contexts | 109 | ||
9.2.2 The change in waterscape profiles | 111 | ||
9.2.3 The decline of tanks | 112 | ||
9.3 THE PRESENT SITUATION OF TANKS IN THE UPPER CATCHMENT OF THE TUNGABHADRA SUB-BASIN | 112 | ||
9.3.1 Tanks still form an important irrigation source | 113 | ||
9.3.2 Tanks have multiple uses | 113 | ||
9.3.3 Shortage of water | 114 | ||
9.3.4 Wells and conjunctive use | 115 | ||
9.3.5 Crop preferences | 115 | ||
9.4 TANKS CAN PLAY A VITAL ROLE IN EQUITABLE AND SUSTAINABLE IWRM | 115 | ||
9.4.1 Prioritizing rehabilitation | 116 | ||
9.4.2 Multi-purpose community resources | 116 | ||
9.4.3 Potentially more dispersed, more equitable IWRM instruments | 116 | ||
9.4.4 Need to go beyond participatory irrigation management | 116 | ||
9.5 INTEGRATING TANKS INTO THE LARGER WATERSCAPE: MAKING INTEGRATION A POSITIVE SUM GAME | 117 | ||
9.5.1 Tanks that receive water from the larger system | 117 | ||
9.5.2 Breaking the conceptual barrier: integrating irrigated and rain-fed farming | 118 | ||
9.5.3 From command areas and irrigators to service areas and water user communities | 118 | ||
9.5.4 Grounding integration: minimum water assurance | 119 | ||
9.5.5 ‘Melons on a vine’ | 119 | ||
9.6 CONCLUSION | 119 | ||
9.6.1 Approach towards local water systems | 120 | ||
9.6.2 Approach towards larger water systems | 120 | ||
9.7 REFERENCES | 120 | ||
Chapter 10: Water quality assessment and water pollution modeling in the Tungabhadra River basin | 121 | ||
10.1 INTRODUCTION | 121 | ||
10.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA | 122 | ||
10.3 APPROACH TO HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING | 122 | ||
10.4 THE SWAT MODEL | 123 | ||
10.5 MODEL IMPLEMENTATION AND DATA AVAILABILITY PROBLEMS IN THE TUNGABHADRA BASIN | 124 | ||
10.6 RESULTS OF MODELING | 128 | ||
10.7 SCENARIO ANALYSIS | 131 | ||
10.8 CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS | 134 | ||
10.9 REFERENCES | 134 | ||
Chapter 11: Tungabhadra sub-basin: Recommendations | 137 | ||
11.1 THE BASIN CONTEXT AND ISSUES | 137 | ||
11.2 RECOMMENDATIONS | 138 | ||
11.2.1 Inter-sectoral integration | 138 | ||
11.2.2 Source integration | 140 | ||
11.2.3 Institutional and policy integration and stakeholder participation | 140 | ||
11.2.4 Access to data and information | 141 | ||
11.2.5 Training and capacity building | 142 | ||
11.3 REFERENCES | 142 | ||
Chapter 12: IWRM status in the Sesan River basin | 145 | ||
12.1 INTRODUCTION | 145 | ||
12.2 THE BASIN CONTEXT | 147 | ||
12.3 IWRM STATUS IN THE SESAN | 148 | ||
12.4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS (EIA) AND THE HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SESAN | 148 | ||
12.5 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE SESAN | 149 | ||
12.5.1 Governance of the Sesan | 149 | ||
12.5.2 Participation | 152 | ||
12.6 INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES RELATED TO IWRM IN THE SESAN | 153 | ||
12.7 CONCLUSIONS | 155 | ||
12.8 REFERENCES | 155 | ||
Chapter 13: Water quality in the Sesan River – Role of natural scientific facts and figures | 157 | ||
13.1 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY OBJECTIVE | 157 | ||
13.2 MAJOR FACTS ABOUT THE SESAN RIVER BASIN | 158 | ||
13.2.1 Example of official monitoring of water quality in Sesan | 159 | ||
13.3 FIELD STUDY AND METHOD | 160 | ||
13.4 RESULTS | 161 | ||
13.4.1 Health effects of cyanobacteria | 161 | ||
13.4.2 Cyanobacteria, toxins and algae composition in Sesan River | 162 | ||
13.4.3 Thermo-tolerant coliform bacteria | 164 | ||
13.4.5 Chemistry | 165 | ||
13.5 FIELD STUDY SUMMARY | 165 | ||
13.6 CONCLUDING REMARKS | 165 | ||
13.7 REFERENCES | 165 | ||
Chapter 14: STRIVER – Overall findings | 167 | ||
14.1 INTRODUCTION | 167 | ||
14.2 THE IWRM STATUS IN THE FOUR STRIVER BASINS | 167 | ||
14.3 SCENARIOS DEVELOPMENT | 169 | ||
14.4 STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION | 170 | ||
14.5 ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW METHODOLOGY WITH SCIENCE-STAKEHOLDER INTERACTION AND STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION | 171 | ||
14.6 TRANSBOUNDARY CONFLICTS AND WATER GOVERNANCE | 171 | ||
14.7 POLLUTION MODELING WITH STAKEHOLDERS | 172 | ||
14.8 LAND AND WATER USE INTERACTIONS | 173 | ||
14.9 STRIVER GUIDANCE AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT | 173 | ||
14.9.1 Major findings | 174 | ||
14.9.2 Concluding remarks: some reflections on how to strengthen European research from the perspective of IWRM | 175 | ||
14.10 REFERENCES | 175 |