Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
In recent years the MBR market has experienced unprecedented growth. The best practice in the field is constantly changing and unique quality requirements and management issues are regularly emerging. Membrane Biological Reactors: Theory, Modeling, Design, Management and Applications to Wastewater Reuse comprehensively covers the salient features and emerging issues associated with the MBR technology. The book provides thorough coverage starting from biological aspects and fundamentals of membranes, via modeling and design concepts, to practitioners’ perspective and good application examples.Â
Membrane Biological Reactors focuses on all the relevant emerging issues raised by including the latest research from renowned experts in the field. It is a valuable reference to the academic and professional community and suitable for undergraduate and postgraduate teaching in Environmental Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology.Â
Editors: Faisal I. Hai, University of Wollongong, Australia Kazuo Yamamoto, University of Tokyo, Japan Chung-Hak Lee, Seoul National University, Korea.Â
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover\r | Cover | ||
Contents | vii | ||
List of abbreviations | xv | ||
Nomenclature | xxiii | ||
About the editors | xxix | ||
Preface | xxxi | ||
Chapter 1: Introduction to membrane biological reactors | 1 | ||
ABSTRACT | 1 | ||
1.1 MEMBRANE BIOLOGICAL REACTORS – DEFINITION AND APPLICATION | 1 | ||
1.2 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF BIOSOLIDS SEPARATION MBRs | 2 | ||
1.3 PROCESS COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (CAS) PROCESS | 5 | ||
1.4 FACTORS INFLUENCING PERFORMANCE/DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS | 8 | ||
1.5 MARKET DRIVERS/RESTRAINTS AND DEVELOPMENT TREND\r | 8 | ||
1.5.1 Current status and typical drivers | 8 | ||
1.5.2 Challenges | 10 | ||
1.5.3 The way forward | 13 | ||
1.6 MBR MARKET\r | 13 | ||
1.6.1 Global market overview | 13 | ||
1.6.2 Regional key drivers and constraints and market trend | 13 | ||
1.6.2.1 Asia-pacific | 13 | ||
1.6.2.2 Europe | 18 | ||
1.6.2.3 Americas (North America and Latin America) | 20 | ||
1.6.2.4 Middle East and Africa | 20 | ||
1.7 WORLDWIDE RESEARCH TREND | 21 | ||
1.8 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 22 | ||
REFERENCES | 23 | ||
Chapter 2:\rProcess fundamentals: From conventional biological wastewater treatment to MBR | 29 | ||
ABSTRACT | 29 | ||
2.1 INTRODUCTION | 29 | ||
2.2 NEED FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT | 30 | ||
2.3 MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, THEIR ENVIRONMENTS AND DEGRADATION PATHWAYS OF POLLUTANTS \r | 30 | ||
2.4 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT FUNDAMENTALS | 32 | ||
2.4.1 Conventional activated sludge (CAS) process basics | 34 | ||
2.4.2 Nitrogen removal | 35 | ||
2.4.3 Phosphorus removal | 35 | ||
2.4.4 Combined biological nutrient removal (BNR) | 36 | ||
2.4.5 Operational requirements | 37 | ||
2.4.5.1 Oxygen | 37 | ||
2.4.5.2 Sludge management | 37 | ||
2.5 MEMBRANE FUNDAMENTALS | 37 | ||
2.5.1 Membrane performance parameters | 38 | ||
2.5.2 Membrane classifications | 39 | ||
2.5.3 Membrane materials, system configurations and operating modes | 41 | ||
2.6 FUNDAMENTALS OF MBR\r | 42 | ||
2.6.1 History of MBR technology | 42 | ||
2.6.2 Differences between CAS and MBR processes | 42 | ||
2.6.3 Design of MBR Systems | 43 | ||
2.6.3.1 MBR arrangements | 43 | ||
2.6.3.2 Element types used in MBR system | 45 | ||
2.6.3.3 Membrane unit life span in MBR | 46 | ||
2.6.4 Process overview | 46 | ||
2.6.5 Biology in MBR | 47 | ||
2.6.6 Operation of the membrane system in MBR | 47 | ||
2.6.6.1 Fouling classification | 48 | ||
2.6.6.2 Fouling control | 49 | ||
2.6.6.3 Membrane integrity | 50 | ||
2.6.7 Energy utilization in MBR | 51 | ||
2.7 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 52 | ||
REFERENCES | 52 | ||
Chapter 3:\rMembrane bioreactors: Design, operation and maintenance | 55 | ||
ABSTRACT | 55 | ||
3.1 INTRODUCTION | 55 | ||
3.2 TECHNICAL CONCEPTS | 56 | ||
3.3 REFERENCE DATA ON DESIGN AND OPERATION | 56 | ||
3.3.1 Municipal/Urban applications | 58 | ||
3.3.1.1 Ulu Pandan MBR, Singapore | 58 | ||
3.3.1.2 Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA | 59 | ||
3.3.1.3 Beddington Zero Energy Development MBR, Great Britain | 60 | ||
3.3.2 Industrial applications | 61 | ||
3.3.2.1 COOPERL Lamballe, abattoir wastewater, France | 61 | ||
3.3.2.2 Aquapolo ambiental, S.A., Brazil | 61 | ||
3.3.3 Groundwater replenishment | 62 | ||
3.3.3.1 Glessen MBR, Germany | 62 | ||
3.4 MBR DESIGN\r | 63 | ||
3.4.1 Design workflow | 63 | ||
3.4.2 General plant layout | 65 | ||
3.4.2.1 Integrated or separate filtration units | 65 | ||
3.4.3 Wastewater composition, volume and temperature | 66 | ||
3.4.4 Process units: Inflow equalisation | 68 | ||
3.4.5 Process units: Mechanical pre-treatment | 68 | ||
3.4.6 Process units: Biological treatment | 70 | ||
3.4.7 Process units: Membrane unit design | 75 | ||
3.4.8 Process units: Aeration | 80 | ||
3.4.9 Process units: Automation | 83 | ||
3.4.10 Cost evaluations | 84 | ||
3.4.11 Alternative MBR concepts | 85 | ||
3.5 OPERATION AND PLANT MANAGEMENT | 85 | ||
3.5.1 Membrane cleaning and maintenance | 85 | ||
3.5.2 Process reliability | 86 | ||
3.5.3 Residuals and waste sludge management | 87 | ||
3.5.4 Personnel and qualification | 88 | ||
3.6 R&D NEEDS FROM AN OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE | 88 | ||
3.7 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 89 | ||
REFERENCES | 90 | ||
Chapter 4:\rMonitoring, characterization and control of membrane biofouling in MBR | 97 | ||
ABSTRACT | 97 | ||
4.1 INTRODUCTION | 97 | ||
4.2 MONITORING\r | 98 | ||
4.2.1 Importance of monitoring | 98 | ||
4.2.2 Methods used for assessment of filterability of mixed liquor | 99 | ||
4.2.2.1 Simple methods used in conventional activated sludge (CAS) | 99 | ||
4.2.2.2 Critical flux measurements | 99 | ||
4.2.2.3 Use of stirred dead-end cells | 99 | ||
4.2.2.4 Recently proposed methods | 99 | ||
4.2.3 Identification of dominant parameters in filterability of mixed liquor | 101 | ||
4.2.3.1 MLSS and viscosity | 102 | ||
4.2.3.2 Relative hydrophobicity (RH) | 102 | ||
4.2.3.3 Particle size | 102 | ||
4.2.3.4 EPS/SMP | 103 | ||
4.2.4 Problems to be addressed in monitoring of the filterability of mixed liquor | 103 | ||
4.3 CHARACTERIZATION OF MEMBRANE FOULANTS IN MBRs | 104 | ||
4.3.1 Approaches to morphological visualization | 104 | ||
4.3.1.1 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) | 104 | ||
4.3.1.2 Atomic force microscopy (AFM) | 105 | ||
4.3.1.3 Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) | 105 | ||
4.3.1.4 Direct observation (DiO) | 107 | ||
4.3.2 Approaches to componential characterization | 108 | ||
4.3.2.1 Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) | 108 | ||
4.3.2.2 Spectroscopic techniques for organic matter characterization | 109 | ||
4.3.3 Approaches to microbiological identification | 110 | ||
4.3.4 Summary of approaches to characterization | 112 | ||
4.4 BIOFOULING CONTROL | 115 | ||
4.4.1 Membrane development | 115 | ||
4.4.2 Chemical approaches | 116 | ||
4.4.2.1 Chemical cleaning | 116 | ||
4.4.2.2 Chemical additives | 117 | ||
4.4.3 Physical (hydrodynamic, mechanical) approaches | 118 | ||
4.4.3.1 Aeration | 118 | ||
4.4.3.2 Backflushing | 119 | ||
4.4.3.3 Moving media | 120 | ||
4.4.3.4 Critical flux | 120 | ||
4.4.3.5 Electrical control | 120 | ||
4.4.4 Biological approaches | 121 | ||
4.4.4.1 Control of membrane biofouling by inhibiting quorum sensing | 122 | ||
4.4.4.2 Control of membrane biofouling by nitric oxide | 125 | ||
4.4.4.3 Control of membrane biofouling by enzymatic disruption of EPS | 126 | ||
4.4.4.4 Control of membrane biofouling by bacteriophage | 126 | ||
4.5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 127 | ||
REFERENCES | 127 | ||
Chapter 5: Advanced wastewater treatment using MBRs: Nutrient removal and disinfection | 137 | ||
ABSTRACT | 137 | ||
5.1 INTRODUCTION | 138 | ||
5.2 REUSE AND RECYCLING OF RECLAIMED WASTEWATER | 138 | ||
5.2.1 Urban reuse | 141 | ||
5.2.2 Agricultural reuse | 141 | ||
5.2.3 Impoundments | 142 | ||
5.2.4 Environmental reuse | 142 | ||
5.2.5 Industrial reuse | 142 | ||
5.2.6 Groundwater recharge – nonpotable reuse | 143 | ||
5.2.7 Potable reuse | 143 | ||
5.3 ADVANCED DESIGNS OF MBRs FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL | 143 | ||
5.3.1 Design of MBRs for removal of organic matter and nitrogen | 145 | ||
5.3.2 Design of MBRs for simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus | 145 | ||
5.4 EFFECTS OF THE MICROBIAL COMMUNITY ON NUTRIENT REMOVAL IN MBRs | 146 | ||
5.5 CASE STUDIES: REUSE AND RECYCLING OF MBR EFFLUENTS | 148 | ||
5.6 NUTRIENT RECOVERY FROM MBR EFFLUENTS | 151 | ||
5.7 CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH PATHOGEN REMOVAL BY MBRs | 152 | ||
5.8 POST-TREATMENTS FOR DISINFECTION OF THE MBR EFFLUENTS | 155 | ||
5.8.1 Chlorination | 155 | ||
5.8.2 Ultraviolet irradiation | 156 | ||
5.8.3 Ozonation | 156 | ||
5.8.4 Other post-treatments for MBR effluents | 156 | ||
5.8.5 Applications of AOPs for MBR effluents | 157 | ||
5.9 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 157 | ||
REFERENCES | 158 | ||
Chapter 6:\rWastewater reuse: Removal of emerging trace organic contaminants (TrOC) | 165 | ||
ABSTRACT | 165 | ||
6.1 INTRODUCTION | 165 | ||
6.2 TrOC IN WATER AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT ON REUSE | 166 | ||
6.3 RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF MBR AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES\r | 167 | ||
6.3.1 Conceptual expectations | 167 | ||
6.3.2 Reported comparative performance of CAS and MBR | 168 | ||
6.4 EFFECT OF TrOC PRESENCE IN WASTEWATER ON BASIC PERFORMANCE OF MBR | 170 | ||
6.5 FACTORS AFFECTING TrOC REMOVAL BY MBR | 171 | ||
6.5.1 Characteristics of the TrOC | 171 | ||
6.5.1.1 Categorization based on usage | 171 | ||
6.5.1.2 Physicochemical properties | 172 | ||
6.5.2 Operating parameters | 179 | ||
6.5.2.1 Concentration, characteristics and acclimatization of biomass | 179 | ||
6.5.2.2 Solids retention time (SRT) and hydraulic retention time (HRT) | 180 | ||
6.5.2.3 Cometabolism and TrOC loading | 183 | ||
6.5.2.4 Mixed liquor pH | 184 | ||
6.5.2.5 Mixed liquor temperature | 185 | ||
6.5.2.6 Mixed liquor dissolved oxygen concentration | 186 | ||
6.6 CORRELATION OF TrOC REMOVAL WITH NITRIFICATION AND DENITRIFICATION | 187 | ||
6.7 EFFECT OF MBR-EFFLUENT DISINFECTION ON TrOC REMOVAL | 189 | ||
6.8 OVERALL FATE AND METABOLIC PATHWAYS | 189 | ||
6.9 POST TREATMENTS AND MBR-BASED HYBRID SYSTEMS | 190 | ||
6.9.1 Combination with physicochemical processes | 191 | ||
6.9.2 Bioaugmented MBR for TrOC removal | 193 | ||
6.10 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 194 | ||
REFERENCES | 195 | ||
Chapter 7:\rImpacts of hazardous events on performance of membrane bioreactors | 207 | ||
ABSTRACT | 207 | ||
7.1 INTRODUCTION – HAZARDOUS EVENTS IN RISK ASSESSMENT | 207 | ||
7.2 CHARACTERISATION OF POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS EVENTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON MBR OPERATION | 209 | ||
7.2.1 Deviation from normal operation | 210 | ||
7.2.1.1 Collection | 210 | ||
7.2.1.2 Pre-treatment | 210 | ||
7.2.1.3 Activated sludge process | 210 | ||
7.2.1.4 Membrane filtration | 211 | ||
7.2.1.5 Post-treatment | 212 | ||
7.3 EXPECTED CONSEQUENCES OF KEY HAZARDOUS EVENTS TYPES | 212 | ||
7.3.1 Impact on the removal of bulk organic matter and nutrients | 212 | ||
7.3.2 Impact on the removal of microorganisms and microbial indicators | 214 | ||
7.4 ASSESSING LIKELIHOODS OF MBR HAZARDOUS EVENTS | 217 | ||
7.5 MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS EVENTS THROUGH ENGINEERED REDUNDANCY AND MULTIPLE BARRIER TREATMENT SYSTEMS | 218 | ||
7.6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 219 | ||
REFERENCES | 219 | ||
Chapter 8:\rCost benefit and environmental Life Cycle Assessment | 223 | ||
ABSTRACT | 223 | ||
8.1 INTRODUCTION | 224 | ||
8.2 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS | 224 | ||
8.2.1 Modeling of operational costs of WWTP and membrane technologies | 225 | ||
8.2.2 Calculation of the environmental benefits associated with WWTP the shadow prices methodology | 225 | ||
8.3 LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT\r | 227 | ||
8.3.1 Life cycle assessment methodology | 227 | ||
8.3.1.1 Goal and scope | 227 | ||
8.3.1.2 Life Cycle Inventory analysis | 227 | ||
8.3.1.3 Life Cycle Impact Assessment | 228 | ||
8.3.1.4 Interpretation of results | 228 | ||
8.3.2 Life Cycle Assessment of WWTP and membrane technologies | 228 | ||
8.4 ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE OF FULL SCALE MBR | 230 | ||
8.4.1 Economic profile | 231 | ||
8.4.2 Environmental profile | 233 | ||
8.4.2.1 Goal and scope | 233 | ||
8.4.2.2 Life Cycle Inventory analysis | 234 | ||
8.4.2.3 Life Cycle Impact Assessment | 238 | ||
8.4.2.3.1 Impact assessment methodology | 238 | ||
8.4.2.3.2 General overview | 238 | ||
8.4.2.3.3 Eutrophication | 239 | ||
8.4.2.3.4 Acidification | 239 | ||
8.4.2.3.5 Global warming | 240 | ||
8.4.2.3.6 Human toxicity | 241 | ||
8.4.2.3.7 Freshwater ecotoxicity | 242 | ||
8.4.2.4 Results interpretation | 243 | ||
8.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE OF PILOT PLANT MBR | 244 | ||
8.5.1 Goal and scope | 244 | ||
8.5.2 Life Cycle Inventory analysis | 245 | ||
8.5.3 Life Cycle Impact Assessment | 250 | ||
8.5.3.1 Impact assessment methodology | 250 | ||
8.5.3.2 Eutrophication | 251 | ||
8.5.3.3 Acidification | 251 | ||
8.5.3.4 Global warming | 252 | ||
8.5.3.5 Human toxicity | 252 | ||
8.5.3.6 Freshwater ecotoxicity | 253 | ||
8.5.4 Result interpretation | 254 | ||
8.6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 255 | ||
REFERENCES | 255 | ||
Chapter 9:\rMBR modeling studies | 263 | ||
ABSTRACT | 263 | ||
9.1 INTRODUCTION | 263 | ||
9.2 BIOLOGICAL MODELS\r | 264 | ||
9.2.1 Introduction to ASM models | 264 | ||
9.2.2 ASMs to MBR modeling | 267 | ||
9.2.3 Application of unmodified/conventional ASMs to MBR | 268 | ||
9.2.3.1 Estimation of sludge production | 270 | ||
9.2.3.2 Nitrogen and phosphorous removal process performance | 275 | ||
9.2.4 Application of modified/integrated ASMs models to MBR | 279 | ||
9.2.4.1 Modeling of SMP/EPS formation and degradation | 279 | ||
9.3 FILTRATION MODELS | 285 | ||
9.4. CFD AND HYDRODYNAMICS – MODELING OF MBR TANKS AND FLUID DYNAMICS | 289 | ||
9.4.1 Module design | 289 | ||
9.4.2 Process design and operation | 289 | ||
9.5 CONTROL AND OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES | 290 | ||
9.6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 291 | ||
REFERENCES | 291 | ||
Chapter 10:\rGas-diffusion, extractive, biocatalytic, and electrochemical membrane biological reactors | 299 | ||
ABSTRACT | 299 | ||
10.1 INTRODUCTION | 299 | ||
10.2 MEMBRANE BIOFILM REACTORS (MBfRs)\r | 301 | ||
10.2.1 Overview | 301 | ||
10.2.2 Membrane materials and configurations | 301 | ||
10.2.3 Aeration MBfRs | 302 | ||
10.2.3.1 Removal of organic matter | 302 | ||
10.2.3.2 Removal of nutrients | 304 | ||
10.2.3.3 Removal of xenobiotics | 306 | ||
10.2.4 Hydrogen MBfRs | 307 | ||
10.2.5 Methane MBfRs | 308 | ||
10.3 EXTRACTIVE MBRs FOR CORROSIVE/TOXIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT | 308 | ||
10.4 BIOCATALYTIC MBRs\r | 310 | ||
10.4.1 Types and applications of biocatalytic MBRs | 310 | ||
10.4.2 Membranes for biocatalytic MBRs | 312 | ||
10.4.3 Enzymatic membrane reactors (EMRs) for xenobiotics removal | 312 | ||
10.4.4 Membrane fouling in EMRs for xenobiotics removal | 316 | ||
10.4.5 Inhibition of enzymatic activity in EMRs for xenobiotics removal | 316 | ||
10.4.6 Immobilized-cell membrane reactors (ICMRs) for xenobiotics removal | 317 | ||
10.5 ELECTROCHEMICAL MBRs | 320 | ||
10.6 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 322 | ||
REFERENCES | 323 | ||
Chapter 11:\rAnaerobic MBRs | 335 | ||
ABSTRACT | 335 | ||
11.1 INTRODUCTION | 336 | ||
11.2 HISTORY | 337 | ||
11.3 SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS | 337 | ||
11.4 APPLICATIONS OF AnMBRS | 339 | ||
11.4.1 Municipal wastewater treatment | 339 | ||
11.4.2 Industrial wastewater treatment | 341 | ||
11.5 MEMBRANE FOULING | 344 | ||
11.5.1 Membrane fouling mechanisms | 346 | ||
11.5.2 Membrane fouling characterization | 348 | ||
11.5.2.1 Physical characterization | 348 | ||
11.5.2.2 Chemical characterization | 348 | ||
11.5.2.3 Microbiological characterization | 349 | ||
11.6 FACTORS AFFECTING THE TREATMENT PERFORMANCE AND MEMBRANE FOULING | 349 | ||
11.6.1 Membrane properties | 354 | ||
11.6.2 Effects of operating and environmental conditions | 355 | ||
11.6.2.1 Effects of solid retention time (SRT) and hydraulic retention time (HRT) | 356 | ||
11.6.2.2 Effects of temperature and pH | 356 | ||
11.6.2.3 Wastewater composition | 358 | ||
11.6.3 Hydrodynamic conditions | 358 | ||
11.6.4 Sludge properties | 359 | ||
11.6.4.1 Mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) | 359 | ||
11.6.4.2 Particle size distribution | 360 | ||
11.6.4.3 Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) | 360 | ||
11.6.5 Strategies for performance stability and membrane fouling control | 362 | ||
11.6.5.1 Reducing the fouling rate | 362 | ||
11.6.5.2 Membrane cleaning | 363 | ||
11.7 COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL OF AnMBRS\r | 363 | ||
11.7.1 Water reuse and energy production | 363 | ||
11.7.2 Reduced energy consumption | 365 | ||
11.7.3 Economic analysis | 365 | ||
11.8 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 366 | ||
REFERENCES | 367 | ||
Chapter 12:\rHybrid processes, new generation membranes and novel MBR designs | 379 | ||
ABSTRACT | 379 | ||
12.1 INTRODUCTION | 379 | ||
12.2 INTEGRATED MBR SYSTEMS FOR WATER RECLAMATION | 380 | ||
12.2.1 Biofilm MBR | 380 | ||
12.2.2 Aerobic granular sludge MBR | 382 | ||
12.2.3 MBR integrated with physico-chemical processes | 383 | ||
12.2.3.1 MBR with Fenton oxidation process | 383 | ||
12.2.3.2 MBR with ozonation | 383 | ||
12.2.3.3 MBR with activated carbon | 383 | ||
12.2.3.4 MBR with coagulation | 385 | ||
12.3 INNOVATIVE MEMBRANE DESIGN FOR MBR | 385 | ||
12.3.1 CNT-doped membranes | 385 | ||
12.3.2 TiO2-doped membranes | 385 | ||
12.3.3 Grafted polymer membranes | 387 | ||
12.3.4 Electrospun nanofiber membranes | 387 | ||
12.4 INNOVATIVE MBR DESIGNS | 387 | ||
12.4.1 NF-MBR | 388 | ||
12.4.2 FO-MBR | 388 | ||
12.4.3 MD-MBR | 389 | ||
12.4.4 Air sparging for fouling control | 391 | ||
12.4.5 Anammox-MBR | 392 | ||
12.4.6 Bioaugmented MBR | 392 | ||
12.5 INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY | 393 | ||
12.5.1 Mechanical recovery of energy from MBR | 393 | ||
12.5.2 PRO-MBR | 393 | ||
12.5.3 MFC-MBR | 395 | ||
12.6 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 396 | ||
REFERENCES | 396 | ||
Chapter 13:\rCommercial technologies and selected case studies | 401 | ||
ABSTRACT | 401 | ||
13.1 INTRODUCTION TO COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS\r | 401 | ||
13.1.1 Background | 401 | ||
13.1.2 Membrane materials | 403 | ||
13.1.2.1 Polymeric membranes | 403 | ||
13.1.2.2 Ceramic membranes | 404 | ||
13.1.2.3 Membrane materials selected for commercial products | 404 | ||
13.1.3 Module format | 405 | ||
13.1.4 System configuration | 408 | ||
13.1.5 Product nomenclature | 409 | ||
13.2 MANUFACTURERS’ REVIEW\r | 410 | ||
13.2.1 Overview | 410 | ||
13.2.2 Immersed hollow fibre | 413 | ||
13.2.2.1 GE-Zenon | 413 | ||
13.2.2.2 Siemens-Memcor | 415 | ||
13.2.2.3 Asahi-Kasei | 417 | ||
13.2.2.4 Memstar | 419 | ||
13.2.2.5 Mitsubishi rayon corporation (MRC) | 421 | ||
13.2.2.6 Koch-Puron | 423 | ||
13.2.2.7 Econity | 425 | ||
13.2.2.8 Others | 426 | ||
13.2.3 Immersed flat sheet | 426 | ||
13.2.3.1 Kubota | 426 | ||
13.2.3.2 Toray | 429 | ||
13.2.3.3 Others | 429 | ||
13.2.4 External | 432 | ||
13.2.4.1 Crossflow | 432 | ||
13.2.4.2 Air lift | 433 | ||
13.3 CASE STUDIES\r | 436 | ||
13.3.1 Immersed hollow fibre case studies | 436 | ||
13.3.1.1 GE-Zenon: Energy optimization studies at Ulu Pandan, Singapore | 436 | ||
13.3.1.2 Koch-Puron: A reliability and energy optimization demonstration at Santa Paula | 437 | ||
13.3.2 Flat sheet case studies | 440 | ||
13.3.2.1 Kubota, retrofit MBR | 440 | ||
13.3.3 External case studies | 441 | ||
13.3.3.1 Pentair-Xflow air lift MBR: Energy optimization at Ootmarsum | 441 | ||
13.3.3.2 Aquabio/Berghof: Wastewater treatment at Kanes Food | 441 | ||
13.4 SUMMARY AND FUTURE OUTLOOK | 443 | ||
REFERENCES | 444 | ||
Index | 447 |