BOOK
Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment
Beate Escher | Frederic Leusch | Heather Chapman | Anita Poulsen
(2011)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Part of Water Quality Set - Buy all four books and save over 30% on buying separately!
Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment reviews the application of bioanalytical tools to the assessment of water quality including surveillance monitoring. The types of water included range from wastewater to drinking water, including recycled water, as well as treatment processes and advanced water treatment. Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment not only demonstrates applications but also fills in the background knowledge in toxicology/ecotoxicology needed to appreciate these applications.
Each chapter summarises fundamental material in a targeted way so that information can be applied to better understand the use of bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment. Bioanalytical tools in Water Quality Assessment can be used by lecturers teaching academic and professional courses and also by risk assessors, regulators, experts, consultants, researchers and managers working in the water sector. It can also be a reference manual for environmental engineers, analytical chemists, and toxicologists.
Authors: Beate Escher, National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (EnTox), The University of Queensland, Australia, Frederic Leusch, Smart Water Research Facility (G51), Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Australia. With contributions by Heather Chapman and Anita Poulsen
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover page | 1 | ||
Half title page | 2 | ||
Title page | 3 | ||
Copyright page | 4 | ||
Contents | 5 | ||
Preface | 13 | ||
Acknowledgements | 15 | ||
Chapter 1 | 17 | ||
Chapter 2 | 36 | ||
2.1 INTRODUCTION | 36 | ||
2.2 CURRENT RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICALS | 37 | ||
2.2.1 Hazard identification | 38 | ||
2.2.2 Effect assessment | 39 | ||
2.2.2.1 Dose-response assessment | 39 | ||
2.2.2.2 PBT assessment | 40 | ||
2.2.3 Exposure assessment | 41 | ||
2.2.4 Risk characterisation | 41 | ||
2.2.5 Risk management | 42 | ||
2.3 APPLICATION OF BIOANALYTICAL TOOLS IN CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 42 | ||
2.3.1 Closing data gaps | 42 | ||
2.3.2 Integrated testing strategy | 43 | ||
2.3.3 Alternatives to animal testing methods | 44 | ||
2.3.4 In vitro assays | 45 | ||
2.3.5 Future directions for application of bioanalytical tools in quantitative risk assessment | 45 | ||
2.4 CONCLUSIONS | 47 | ||
Chapter 3 | 48 | ||
3.1 BACKGROUND | 48 | ||
3.2 HUMAN USE OF WATER | 49 | ||
3.2.1 Drinking water | 49 | ||
3.2.2 Recycled water, stormwater and managed aquifer recharge | 51 | ||
3.3 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS | 52 | ||
3.4 WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) | 53 | ||
3.4.1 Test systems in aquatic ecotoxicology commonly applied to WET testing | 54 | ||
3.4.2 In situ WET testing | 56 | ||
3.4.3 Ecological endpoints | 57 | ||
3.4.4 Biomarkers in WET testing | 57 | ||
3.4.5 “WET testing” using bioanalytical tools | 58 | ||
3.4.6 Case study 1 – WET testing of Sydney municipal effluents | 58 | ||
3.4.7 Case study 2 – Screening of wastewater quality using the fish embryo test | 59 | ||
3.5 CONCLUSIONS | 60 | ||
Chapter 4 | 62 | ||
4.1 INTRODUCTION | 62 | ||
4.2 TOXICOKINETICS | 63 | ||
4.2.1 Uptake, distribution and elimination | 63 | ||
4.2.2 Xenobiotic metabolism | 63 | ||
4.2.3 Toxicokinetic indicators of chemical exposure | 64 | ||
4.2.4 Reflecting toxicokinetics in cell-based bioassays | 65 | ||
4.3 TOXICODYNAMIC PROCESSES: TOXICITY PATHWAYS | 67 | ||
4.4 MODE OF ACTION CLASSIFICATION | 70 | ||
4.4.1 Non-specific toxicity | 71 | ||
4.4.2 Specific modes of toxic action | 74 | ||
4.4.2.1 Enzyme inhibition | 74 | ||
4.4.2.2 Disturbance of energy production | 75 | ||
4.4.2.3 Neurotoxicity | 75 | ||
4.4.2.4 Modulation of endocrine functions | 76 | ||
4.4.3 Reactive toxicity | 77 | ||
4.4.3.1 Direct genotoxicity | 77 | ||
4.4.3.2 Non-specific reactivity towards proteins | 78 | ||
4.4.3.3 Oxidative stress | 79 | ||
4.4.3.4 Lipid peroxidation | 80 | ||
4.5 KEEPING THE RIGHT BALANCE: GENERAL STRESS RESPONSE PATHWAYS | 80 | ||
4.6 CONCLUSIONS | 82 | ||
Chapter 5 | 84 | ||
5.1 INTRODUCTION | 84 | ||
5.2 ROUTE OF EXPOSURE | 86 | ||
5.3 BASAL CYTOTOXICITY | 86 | ||
5.4 TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY | 88 | ||
5.4.1 Hepatotoxicity | 88 | ||
5.4.2 Nephrotoxicity | 89 | ||
5.4.3 Cardiovascular toxicity | 90 | ||
5.4.3.1 Cardiotoxicity | 90 | ||
5.4.3.2 Vascular toxicity | 91 | ||
5.5 NON-ORGAN-DIRECTED TOXICITY | 91 | ||
5.5.1 Carcinogenicity | 92 | ||
5.5.2 Developmental toxicology | 93 | ||
5.6 SYSTEM TOXICITY | 93 | ||
5.6.1 Haematotoxicity | 94 | ||
5.6.2 Immunotoxicity | 95 | ||
5.6.3 Neurotoxicity | 96 | ||
5.6.4 Endocrine toxicity | 98 | ||
5.6.5 Reproductive toxicity | 100 | ||
5.7 CONCLUSIONS | 101 | ||
Chapter 6 | 102 | ||
6.1 INTRODUCTION | 102 | ||
6.2 FROM THE CELLULAR LEVEL TO THE ECOSYSTEM | 103 | ||
6.3 ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS FOR AQUATIC ORGANISMS | 104 | ||
6.3.1 Adverse outcome pathways for algae | 104 | ||
6.3.1.1 Baseline toxicity | 104 | ||
6.3.1.2 Inhibition of photosynthesis by herbicides | 105 | ||
6.3.2 Adverse outcome pathways for water flea | 106 | ||
6.3.2.1 Baseline toxicity | 106 | ||
6.3.2.2 Activity of insecticides | 107 | ||
6.3.3 Adverse outcome pathways for fish | 107 | ||
6.3.3.1 Baseline toxicity | 107 | ||
6.3.3.2 Estrogenicity | 108 | ||
6.4 USING IN VITRO ASSAYS TO UNDERSTAND TOXICITY PATHWAYS IN AQUATIC LIFE | 109 | ||
6.5 CONCLUSIONS | 109 | ||
Chapter 7 | 110 | ||
7.1 INTRODUCTION | 110 | ||
7.2 DOSE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT | 110 | ||
7.2.1 Dose-response curves | 110 | ||
7.2.2 Toxicity continuum | 113 | ||
7.2.3 Benchmark values to describe effects | 114 | ||
7.3 TOXIC EQUIVALENCY CONCEPT | 117 | ||
7.3.1 Relative effect potency (REP) | 117 | ||
7.3.2 Relative enrichment factor (REF) and toxic equivalent concentration (TEQ) | 119 | ||
7.3.3 Limitations to the application of the TEQ concept in water quality assessment | 121 | ||
7.4 CONCLUSIONS | 122 | ||
Chapter 8 | 123 | ||
8.1 INTRODUCTION | 123 | ||
8.2 TOXICITY OF DEFINED MIXTURES | 124 | ||
8.2.1 Independent action | 124 | ||
8.2.2 Concentration or dose addition | 125 | ||
8.2.3 Synergistic and antagonistic effects | 126 | ||
8.2.4 Grouping of chemicals | 128 | ||
8.2.5 Something from nothing? | 129 | ||
8.3 ASSESSMENT OF CONCENTRATION-ADDITIVE EFFECTS USING THE TOXIC EQUIVALENCY CONCEPT | 131 | ||
8.4 MIXTURES IN RISK ASSESSMENT | 132 | ||
8.4.1 Concepts | 132 | ||
8.4.2 Do we need to account for mixture effects in risk assessment? | 134 | ||
8.4.3 Existing regulations | 135 | ||
8.5 MIXTURES AND WATER QUALITY | 136 | ||
8.5.1 What types of mixture effects occur in watersamples with thousands of chemicals at very lowconcentrations? | 136 | ||
8.5.2 Bridging the gap between chemical and bioassay analysis of mixtures: TEQchem and TEQbio | 136 | ||
8.6 CONCLUSION | 137 | ||
Chapter 9 | 138 | ||
9.1 INTRODUCTION | 138 | ||
9.2 PRINCIPLES OF CELL-BASED BIOASSAYS | 139 | ||
9.3 PLANNING A SOUND BIOASSAY BATTERY | 141 | ||
9.4 BIOASSAYS INDICATIVE OF NON-SPECIFIC TOXICITY | 142 | ||
9.4.1 Bacterial assays | 143 | ||
9.4.2 Yeast assays | 144 | ||
9.4.3 Fish cell lines | 145 | ||
9.4.4 Mammalian and human cell lines | 145 | ||
9.5 BIOASSAYS INDICATIVE OF REACTIVE TOXICITY | 146 | ||
9.5.1 Genotoxic carcinogens | 146 | ||
9.5.2 Non-genotoxic electrophilic mechanisms | 150 | ||
9.5.3 Epigenetic carcinogens | 152 | ||
9.5.4 Oxidative stress | 152 | ||
9.6 BIOASSAYS INDICATIVE OF SPECIFIC MODES OF ACTION | 152 | ||
9.6.1 Target organ toxicity | 153 | ||
9.6.1.1 Hepatotoxicity | 153 | ||
9.6.1.2 Nephrotoxicity | 155 | ||
9.6.1.3 Cardiovascular toxicity | 155 | ||
9.6.2 Non-organ-directed toxicity | 155 | ||
9.6.2.1 Carcinogenicity | 155 | ||
9.6.2.2 Developmental toxicity | 155 | ||
9.6.3 System toxicity | 157 | ||
9.6.3.1 Haematotoxicity | 157 | ||
9.6.3.2 Immunotoxicity | 157 | ||
9.6.3.3 Neurotoxicity | 157 | ||
9.6.3.4 Endocrine effects | 159 | ||
9.6.3.5 Reproductive toxicity | 163 | ||
9.6.4 Phytotoxicity | 163 | ||
9.7 CONCLUSION | 164 | ||
Chapter 10 | 165 | ||
10.1 INTRODUCTION | 165 | ||
10.2 METHOD VALIDATION | 166 | ||
10.2.1 Accuracy | 166 | ||
10.2.2 Precision | 166 | ||
10.2.3 Robustness | 166 | ||
10.2.4 Selectivity | 167 | ||
10.2.5 Sensitivity | 167 | ||
10.2.6 Specificity | 167 | ||
10.2.7 Sample stability | 167 | ||
10.3 QA/QC IN THE LABORATORY | 167 | ||
10.3.1 Replication | 168 | ||
10.3.1.1 Within-plate replication | 168 | ||
10.3.1.2 Between-plates replication | 169 | ||
10.3.1.3 Between-runs replication | 169 | ||
10.3.1.4 True sample replicates | 169 | ||
10.3.2 Quality control samples | 170 | ||
10.3.2.1 Standard curve | 170 | ||
10.3.2.2 Positive control sample | 172 | ||
10.3.2.3 Negative control sample | 172 | ||
10.3.2.4 Field and laboratory blanks | 172 | ||
10.3.2.5 Inter-assay sample | 173 | ||
10.3.3 Control charts and fixed control criteria | 173 | ||
10.3.3.1 Control charts | 173 | ||
10.3.3.2 Fixed control criteria | 174 | ||
10.3.4 Standardisation and documentation | 174 | ||
10.4 THE IMPORTANCE OF SAMPLE PREPARATION | 175 | ||
10.5 CONCLUSIONS | 176 | ||
Chapter 11 | 177 | ||
11.1 INTRODUCTION | 177 | ||
11.1.1 Historical background | 177 | ||
11.1.2 Bioassay battery design considerations | 178 | ||
11.1.3 Assessing treatment efficacy using bioassays | 182 | ||
11.1.4 Introduction to the case studies | 182 | ||
11.2 APPLICATION OF BIOANALYTICAL TOOLS TO ASSESS THE REMOVAL OF MICROPOLLUTANTS ACROSS THE URBAN WATER CYCLE | 183 | ||
11.2.1 The urban water cycle: From sewage to drinkingwater | 183 | ||
11.2.2 Some practical considerations | 185 | ||
11.2.3 Benchmarking of water quality across the water cycle | 186 | ||
11.2.4 Benchmarking treatment technologies | 188 | ||
11.2.5 Comparison of chemical analysis and bioanalytical tools | 189 | ||
11.3 BENCHMARKING HUMAN HEALTH RISK OF DIFFFERENT TYPES OF WATERS | 191 | ||
11.4 ECOTOXICOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT WITH OZONATION | 195 | ||
Chapter 12 | 199 | ||
12.1 INTRODUCTION | 199 | ||
12.2 ACHIEVEMENTS SO FAR | 199 | ||
12.2.1 A sound guidance for selection of bioassays based on the conceptual framework of toxicity pathways | 199 | ||
12.2.2 A more comprehensive measure of the realm of chemical pollutants | 200 | ||
12.3 FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES | 200 | ||
12.3.1 Matrix effects and extraction methods | 201 | ||
12.3.2 Linking bioanalysis with chemical analysis | 202 | ||
12.3.3 Linking bioanalysis with whole-animal testing | 202 | ||
12.3.4 Bioassays that require further development | 203 | ||
12.3.5 The “omics” | 204 | ||
12.3.6 Three dimensional cell systems to better model whole organism response | 204 | ||
12.3.7 Bioanalytical tools as the canaries in the coalmine? | 204 | ||
12.4 THE ROAD TO REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE | 205 | ||
12.4.1 Option 1: No observed effect of the undiluted water sample | 206 | ||
12.4.2 Option 2: Definition of effect-based trigger values | 206 | ||
12.4.3 Option 3: Redefinition of effect-based guideline values | 207 | ||
12.5 CONCLUSIONS | 207 | ||
Glossary | 209 | ||
References | 225 | ||
INDEX | 257 |