BOOK
Water Reclamation Technologies for Safe Managed Aquifer Recharge
Christian Kazner | Thomas Wintgens | Peter Dillon
(2012)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Part of Groundwater Set - Buy all six books and save over 30% on buying separately!
Water Reclamation Technologies for Safe Managed Aquifer Recharge has been developed from the RECLAIM WATER project supported by the European Commission under Thematic Priority 'Global Change and Ecosystems' of the Sixth Framework Programme. Its strategic objective is to develop hazard mitigation technologies for water reclamation providing safe and cost effective routes for managed aquifer recharge.
Different treatment applications in terms of behaviour of key microbial and chemical contaminants are assessed. Engineered as well as natural treatment trains are investigated to provide guidance for sustainable MAR schemes using alternative sources such as effluent and stormwater. The technologies considered are also well suited to the needs of developing countries, which have a growing need of supplementation of freshwater resources. A broad range of international full-scale case studies enables insights into long-term system behaviour, operational aspects, and fate of a comprehensive number of compounds and contaminants, especially organic micropollutants and bulk organics.
Water Reclamation Technologies for Safe Managed Aquifer Recharge depicts advances in water reclamation technologies and aims to provide new process combinations to treat alternative water sources to appropriate water quality levels for sustainable aquifer recharge.
Editors: Christian Kazner, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, Thomas Wintgens, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Peter Dillon, CSIRO, Australia
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover page | 1 | ||
Half title page | 2 | ||
Title page | 4 | ||
Copyright page | 5 | ||
Contents | 6 | ||
List of contributors | 16 | ||
Acknowledgements | 20 | ||
Foreword - Dr. Panagiotis Balabanis | 22 | ||
Foreword - Dr. Valentina Lazarova | 24 | ||
Chapter 1 | 26 | ||
Introduction | 26 | ||
1.1 THE IMPORTANCE OF MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE | 26 | ||
1.2 RESEARCH IN MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE | 27 | ||
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THIS BOOK | 28 | ||
1.4 CHAPTER CONTENTS | 29 | ||
REFERENCES | 30 | ||
Part A | 34 | ||
International MAR Case Studies | 34 | ||
Chapter 2 | 36 | ||
Water reclamation for aquifer recharge at the eight case study sites: a cross case analysis | 36 | ||
2.1 INTRODUCTION | 36 | ||
2.2 METHODOLOGY | 39 | ||
2.3 RESULTS | 40 | ||
2.3.1 Basic wastewater parameters | 40 | ||
2.3.2 Microbiological parameters | 46 | ||
2.3.3 Trace elements | 49 | ||
2.3.4 Salinity | 49 | ||
2.4 CONCLUSIONS | 51 | ||
REFERENCES | 54 | ||
Chapter 3 | 58 | ||
Indirect potable reuse via managed aquifer recharge in the Torreele/St-André project | 58 | ||
3.1 INTRODUCTION | 58 | ||
3.1.1 Water management situation | 58 | ||
3.1.2 History of implementation | 59 | ||
3.1.3 Treatment and implementation concept | 59 | ||
3.1.4 Authorisation procedure | 59 | ||
3.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 60 | ||
3.2.1 Waste water treatment plant Wulpen | 60 | ||
3.2.2 Advanced water treatment plant Torreele | 61 | ||
3.2.3 Groundwater infiltration at St. André | 62 | ||
3.2.4 Groundwater extraction and treatment facility at St. André | 63 | ||
3.2.5 Hydrogeology | 64 | ||
3.3 TREATMENT TARGETS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK | 64 | ||
3.3.1 Regulated substances | 64 | ||
3.3.2 Unregulated substances | 65 | ||
3.4 WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT | 66 | ||
3.4.1 Regular Monitoring Program | 66 | ||
3.4.2 Measuring program of RECLAIM WATER | 66 | ||
3.4.3 Results | 67 | ||
3.4.4 Technology performance and contaminant monitoring | 68 | ||
3.4.5 Concentrate disposal | 69 | ||
3.5 CONCLUSIONS | 69 | ||
REFERENCES | 69 | ||
Chapter 4 | 72 | ||
Managed aquifer recharge of a karstic aquifer in Nardó, Italy | 72 | ||
4.1 INTRODUCTION | 72 | ||
4.1.1 Historical background | 72 | ||
4.1.2 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 72 | ||
4.1.3 Authorisation procedure | 74 | ||
4.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 76 | ||
4.2.1 Study area | 76 | ||
4.2.2 Hydrogeology | 77 | ||
4.2.3 Process design and operation | 77 | ||
4.2.4 Clogging | 78 | ||
4.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 80 | ||
4.3.1 Wastewater chemical-physical parameters | 80 | ||
4.3.2 Microbiological parameters | 83 | ||
4.3.3 Salinity related parameters | 87 | ||
4.3.4 Water quality changes during MAR | 89 | ||
4.4 OPERATIONAL FEEDBACK | 89 | ||
4.5 CONCLUSION | 90 | ||
REFERENCES | 90 | ||
Chapter 5 | 92 | ||
Managed aquifer recharge via river bed in Sabadell, Spain | 92 | ||
5.1 INTRODUCTION | 92 | ||
5.1.1 Historical background | 92 | ||
5.1.2 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 95 | ||
5.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 96 | ||
5.2.1 Study area | 96 | ||
5.2.2 Ripoll River WWTP | 96 | ||
5.2.3 Ripoll River recharge and reuse scheme | 96 | ||
5.2.4 Hydrogeology | 97 | ||
5.2.5 Process design and operation | 99 | ||
5.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 100 | ||
5.3.1 Basic wastewater parameters | 100 | ||
5.3.2 Nutrients | 102 | ||
5.3.3 Microbiological parameters | 102 | ||
5.3.4 Salinity related parameters | 105 | ||
5.3.5 Trace elements analysis | 105 | ||
5.3.6 Redox conditions | 106 | ||
5.4 OPERATIONAL FEEDBACK | 106 | ||
5.5 CONCLUSION | 107 | ||
REFERENCES | 107 | ||
Chapter 6 | 108 | ||
Managed aquifer recharge for agricultural reuse in Shafdan, Israel | 108 | ||
6.1 INTRODUCTION | 108 | ||
6.1.1 Water management situation | 108 | ||
6.1.2 Historical background | 108 | ||
6.1.3 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 111 | ||
6.1.4 Authorisation procedure | 112 | ||
6.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 112 | ||
6.2.1 Existing full-scale system | 113 | ||
6.2.2 Pilot-scale UF short SAT system | 114 | ||
6.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 119 | ||
6.3.1 Nutrients and bulk organics | 119 | ||
6.3.2 Dissolved oxygen, iron and manganese | 120 | ||
6.3.3 Microbiological contaminants | 122 | ||
6.3.4 Summary removal capacity UF-short SAT | 123 | ||
6.3.5 Summary removal capacity conventional SAT | 125 | ||
6.4 CONCLUSION | 126 | ||
6.4.1 Operational results from short SAT | 126 | ||
6.4.2 Removal capacity of short SAT | 126 | ||
6.4.3 Outlook | 126 | ||
REFERENCES | 127 | ||
Chapter 7 | 128 | ||
The aquifer storage, transfer and recovery project in Salisbury, South Australia | 128 | ||
7.1 INTRODUCTION | 128 | ||
7.1.1 Historical background | 128 | ||
7.1.2 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 128 | ||
7.1.3 Authorisation procedure | 129 | ||
7.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 129 | ||
7.2.1 Study area | 129 | ||
7.2.2 Hydrogeology | 130 | ||
7.2.3 Process design and operation | 132 | ||
7.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 134 | ||
7.3.1 Rainfall, stormwater capture and reuse | 134 | ||
7.3.2 ASTR well-field aquifer conditioning | 135 | ||
7.3.3 ASTR well field, first injection phase | 138 | ||
7.3.4 Water quality assessment based on protocol 1 | 138 | ||
7.4 OPERATIONAL FEEDBACK | 141 | ||
7.5 CONCLUSION | 143 | ||
REFERENCES | 144 | ||
Chapter 8 | 146 | ||
Managed aquifer recharge for potable reuse in Atlantis, South Africa | 146 | ||
8.1 INTRODUCTION | 146 | ||
8.1.1 Historical background | 146 | ||
8.1.2 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 147 | ||
8.1.3 Authorisation procedure | 147 | ||
8.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 147 | ||
8.2.1 Study area | 147 | ||
8.2.2 Hydrogeology | 147 | ||
8.2.3 Process design and operation | 149 | ||
8.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 151 | ||
8.3.1 Dissolved organic carbon | 154 | ||
8.3.2 Electrical conductivity | 155 | ||
8.3.3 Sulphate | 156 | ||
8.3.4 Potassium and calcium | 156 | ||
8.3.5 Boron | 157 | ||
8.3.6 Redox conditions | 158 | ||
8.3.7 Microbiological parameters | 159 | ||
8.3.8 Organic micropollutants | 160 | ||
8.3.9 Summary of water quality monitoring | 161 | ||
8.3.10 Operational feedback | 164 | ||
8.4 CONCLUSIONS | 164 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 164 | ||
REFERENCES | 165 | ||
Chapter 9 | 166 | ||
Unplanned aquifer recharge in El Mezquital/Tula Valley, Mexico | 166 | ||
9.1 INTRODUCTION | 166 | ||
9.1.1 Water management situation | 166 | ||
9.1.2 History of the development of the site | 168 | ||
9.1.3 Technical set-up and operational experiences | 168 | ||
9.1.4 Analytical methodology | 170 | ||
9.2 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 173 | ||
9.2.1 Irrigation water in the Tula Valley | 173 | ||
9.2.2 Supply water | 175 | ||
9.2.3 Soil and soil column analysis | 179 | ||
9.3 CONCLUSIONS | 181 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 181 | ||
REFERENCES | 181 | ||
Chapter 10 | 184 | ||
Managed aquifer recharge by enhanced direct injection-well recharge in Gaobeidian/Beijing, China | 184 | ||
10.1 INTRODUCTION | 184 | ||
10.1.1 Historical background | 184 | ||
10.1.2 Motivations for recharge and use of abstracted water | 186 | ||
10.1.3 Legal framework and authorisation procedure | 186 | ||
10.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST SITE | 186 | ||
10.2.1 Study area | 186 | ||
10.2.2 Process design and operation | 187 | ||
10.3 TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE AND CONTAMINANT MONITORING | 189 | ||
10.3.1 Water quality | 189 | ||
10.3.2 Operational feedback | 192 | ||
10.4 CONCLUSION | 192 | ||
REFERENCES | 193 | ||
Part B | 194 | ||
Water Quality Analysis in MAR – Methods and Results | 194 | ||
Chapter 11 | 196 | ||
Water quality analysis – microbiological hazards | 196 | ||
11.1 INTRODUCTION | 196 | ||
11.1.1 Overview on selected water quality parameters, relevance | 197 | ||
11.1.2 Detection and quantification methods | 200 | ||
11.2 CASE STUDIES | 204 | ||
11.2.1 Belgium (Wulpen/Torreele) | 204 | ||
11.2.2 Italy (Nardò) | 205 | ||
11.2.3 Spain (Sabadell) | 208 | ||
11.2.4 Coherence of pathogen and indicator presence | 210 | ||
11.2.5 Results of pathogen decay studies | 211 | ||
11.3 CONCLUSIONS | 213 | ||
11.3.1 Pathogen contamination numbers | 213 | ||
11.3.2 Treatment performances of MAR processes | 214 | ||
11.3.3 Pathogens and indicators relationships | 215 | ||
11.3.4 ARG in reclaim water sites | 215 | ||
11.3.5 In situ pathogen decay rate | 215 | ||
REFERENCES | 216 | ||
Chapter 12 | 222 | ||
Water quality analysis: Detection, fate, and behaviour, of selected trace organic pollutants at managed aquifer recharge sites | 222 | ||
12.1 INTRODUCTION | 222 | ||
12.2 METHODS | 224 | ||
12.2.1 Sampling, storage and processing at the demonstration sites | 224 | ||
12.2.2 Method 1: antibiotics, neutral drugs, and other micropollutants | 225 | ||
12.2.3 Method 2: acidic drugs and ICM | 226 | ||
12.2.4 Method 3: estrogens | 227 | ||
12.2.5 Method 4: nitrosamines | 227 | ||
12.2.6 Method 5: AOI | 228 | ||
12.2.7 Quality assurance | 228 | ||
12.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | 228 | ||
12.3.1 Nardo | 233 | ||
12.3.2 Sabadell | 235 | ||
12.3.3 Shafdan | 237 | ||
12.3.4 Gaobeidian | 240 | ||
12.3.5 Wulpen/Torrele | 242 | ||
12.4 CROSS SITE ANALYSIS | 244 | ||
12.5 CONCLUSIONS | 248 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 248 | ||
REFERENCES | 249 | ||
Chapter 13 | 252 | ||
Water quality analysis – bulk organic compounds | 252 | ||
13.1 OVERVIEW OF SELECTED WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS | 252 | ||
13.2 SAMPLING, STORAGE AND PROCESSING | 253 | ||
13.3 ANALYTICAL METHODS | 253 | ||
13.4 SELECTED RESULTS FROM LABORATORY AND CASE STUDIES | 254 | ||
13.4.1 Laboratory studies | 255 | ||
13.4.2 Case studies | 257 | ||
13.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | 260 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 260 | ||
REFERENCES | 260 | ||
Part C | 262 | ||
Water Reclamation Technologies in MAR | 262 | ||
Chapter 14 | 264 | ||
Treatment trains utilising natural and hybrid processes | 264 | ||
14.1 NATURAL SYSTEMS FOR WATER RECLAMATION | 264 | ||
14.2 OVERVIEW AND METHODS OF NATURAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS RELATED STUDIES UNDER RECLAIM WATER | 265 | ||
14.3 PERFORMANCE OF TREATMENT TRAINS | 267 | ||
14.3.1 Bulk organics removal | 267 | ||
14.3.2 Nutrient removal | 272 | ||
14.3.3 Organic micropollutant removal | 273 | ||
14.3.4 Pathogen removal | 275 | ||
14.3.5 Soil clogging potential | 277 | ||
14.4 OPERATIONAL ASPECTS | 278 | ||
14.4.1 Soil aquifer treatment | 278 | ||
14.4.2 Constructed wetlands | 279 | ||
14.5 ECONOMIC ASPECTS | 280 | ||
14.5.1 Soil aquifer treatment | 280 | ||
14.5.2 Constructed wetlands | 280 | ||
14.6 CONCLUSIONS | 281 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 281 | ||
REFERENCES | 281 | ||
Chapter 15 | 284 | ||
Membrane based treatment trains for managed aquifer recharge | 284 | ||
15.1 MEMBRANES IN WATER RECLAMATION | 284 | ||
15.2 OVERVIEW AND METHODS OF MEMBRANE TREATMENT RELATED STUDIES UNDER RECLAIM WATER | 285 | ||
15.2.1 Emerging membrane based treatment trains | 287 | ||
15.2.2 Membrane studies under Reclaim Water | 287 | ||
15.3 PERFORMANCE OF TREATMENT TRAINS | 290 | ||
15.3.1 Dual membrane treatment by UF/RO | 290 | ||
15.3.2 Direct NF treatment | 291 | ||
15.3.3 PAC/NF treatment | 292 | ||
15.3.4 GAC/NF treatment | 295 | ||
15.3.5 NF/GAC treatment | 296 | ||
15.3.6 MBR/NF treatment | 297 | ||
15.4 OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE | 299 | ||
15.4.1 Dual membrane treatment | 299 | ||
15.4.2 PAC/NF treatment | 299 | ||
15.4.3 Direct NF | 300 | ||
15.4.4 NF/GAC treatment | 300 | ||
15.4.5 GAC/NF treatment | 300 | ||
15.4.6 MBR/NF treatment | 301 | ||
15.5 ECONOMIC ASPECTS | 301 | ||
15.5.1 Dual membrane treatment | 301 | ||
15.5.2 NF-AC hybrid systems | 301 | ||
15.5.3 MBR/NF treatment | 301 | ||
15.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | 302 | ||
15.6.1 Removal rates | 302 | ||
15.6.2 Comparison with other alternative processes | 303 | ||
15.6.3 Treatment of NF concentrate | 303 | ||
15.6.4 Operational aspects | 303 | ||
15.6.5 Conclusion | 304 | ||
ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE | 304 | ||
REFERENCES | 305 | ||
Chapter 16 | 308 | ||
Treatment of reject streams from dense membrane processes | 308 | ||
16.1 TREATMENT OF RO CONCENTRATE | 308 | ||
16.2 CAPACITIVE DEIONISATION (CDI) | 309 | ||
16.2.1 Concept | 309 | ||
16.2.2 Plant set-up | 309 | ||
16.2.3 Analytical methods | 310 | ||
16.2.4 Water quality | 310 | ||
16.2.5 Operational issues | 311 | ||
16.2.6 Cost estimation | 312 | ||
16.2.7 Conclusions | 312 | ||
16.3 OZONATION | 313 | ||
16.3.1 Removal of emerging pollutants | 313 | ||
16.3.2 Increase of biodegradability by ozonation | 313 | ||
16.3.3 Bromate formation | 313 | ||
16.3.4 Toxicity of RO concentrate | 314 | ||
16.3.5 Oxidation product formation | 314 | ||
16.4 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON WITH MICROFILTRATION (BIO MAC) | 314 | ||
16.4.1 Plant set-up | 315 | ||
16.4.2 Removal capacity | 315 | ||
16.4.3 Operational regime and conclusions | 319 | ||
16.5 SUBSURFACE FLOW REED BED | 319 | ||
16.5.1 Plant set-up | 319 | ||
16.5.2 Removal capacity | 320 | ||
16.6 CONCLUSIONS | 320 | ||
REFERENCES | 320 | ||
Part D | 322 | ||
Design and Management of MAR Systems | 322 | ||
Chapter 17 | 324 | ||
General design considerations | 324 | ||
17.1 INTRODUCTION | 324 | ||
17.2 IDENTIFYING PROJECT OBJECTIVES – WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS? | 324 | ||
17.2.1 Options for storage increase | 325 | ||
17.2.2 Options for water quality improvement | 326 | ||
17.2.3 Options for sustaining groundwater levels and dependent ecosystems | 326 | ||
17.2.4 Whole catchment and groundwater system context | 326 | ||
17.3 STEPS IN ESTABLISHING A MAR PROJECT | 327 | ||
17.3.1 Viability assessment | 327 | ||
17.3.2 Degree of difficulty assessment | 330 | ||
17.3.3 Investigations and risk assessment | 331 | ||
17.4 SITE SELECTION AND AQUIFER CHARACTERISATION | 332 | ||
17.5 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | 332 | ||
17.6 MONITORING | 332 | ||
17.7 CONCLUSIONS | 333 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 333 | ||
REFERENCES | 334 | ||
Chapter 18 | 336 | ||
Use of groundwater models for prediction and optimisation of the behaviour of MAR sites | 336 | ||
18.1 GROUNDWATER MODELLING AND ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE: WHAT MODEL FOR WHAT PROBLEM | 336 | ||
18.1.1 Models as tool to design and operate a MAR system in a given legal context | 336 | ||
18.1.2 Model data requirements and hydrogeological characterisation | 341 | ||
18.1.3 Groundwater modelling and artificial recharge: Model selection | 345 | ||
18.2 CASE STUDIES | 346 | ||
18.2.1 Case study 1: Shafdan | 346 | ||
18.2.2 Case study 2: Adelaide | 353 | ||
18.2.3 Case study 3: Nardò | 358 | ||
18.2.4 Case study 4: Wulpen | 364 | ||
18.3 MODELLING OF MAR SYSTEM: LEARNING FROM THE RECLAIM WATER CASE STUDIES | 367 | ||
REFERENCES | 369 | ||
Chapter 19 | 376 | ||
Risk assessment and risk management in Managed Aquifer Recharge | 376 | ||
19.1 METHODOLOGIES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT | 376 | ||
19.1.1 European Union | 376 | ||
19.1.2 Australia | 378 | ||
19.2 CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY | 380 | ||
19.3 CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE CASE STUDY SITES | 381 | ||
19.3.1 Source waters | 381 | ||
19.3.2 Recovered waters | 385 | ||
19.4 QUANTITATIVE MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY | 389 | ||
19.5 QMRA OF THE CASE STUDIES | 389 | ||
19.5.1 Aquifer barrier treatment characterisation | 390 | ||
19.5.2 Case study sites human health risk assessment | 393 | ||
19.5.3 Valuing the aquifer barrier in MAR schemes | 394 | ||
19.5.4 Integrating aquifer treatment with engineered treatments | 396 | ||
19.6 CONCLUSIONS | 396 | ||
REFERENCES | 397 | ||
Chapter 20 | 400 | ||
Risk perception and communication for managed aquifer recharge | 400 | ||
20.1 INTRODUCTION | 400 | ||
20.2 REASONS FOR AND OBJECTIVES OF RISK COMMUNICATION | 400 | ||
20.3 PRINCIPLES OF RISK COMMUNICATION | 402 | ||
20.3.1 Building and keeping trust | 402 | ||
20.3.2 Framing and managing communication | 403 | ||
20.3.3 Some comments on bias and transparency | 403 | ||
20.4 COMMUNICATING RISK | 403 | ||
20.5 RECONCILING CONFLICTING VIEWS | 404 | ||
20.5.1 Objections over hazard risk | 404 | ||
20.5.2 Objections over outrage factors | 407 | ||
20.6 CONCLUSIONS | 407 | ||
REFERENCES | 407 | ||
Chapter 21 | 408 | ||
Decision support for MAR planning in the context of Integrated Water Resources Management: The Gabardine DSS | 408 | ||
21.1 MAR AND INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT | 408 | ||
21.2 DECISION SUPPORT FOR MAR PLANNING | 409 | ||
21.3 THE GABARDINE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM | 411 | ||
21.3.1 MAR planning process | 411 | ||
21.3.2 DSS structure and GUI | 413 | ||
21.3.3 Spatial database and GIS platform | 414 | ||
21.3.4 The G-DSS planning module | 415 | ||
21.4 G-DSS APPLICATIONS | 418 | ||
21.4.1 The Querença-Silves case study, Portugal | 418 | ||
21.4.2 The Gaza-Strip case study, Palestine | 423 | ||
21.5 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK | 428 | ||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 429 | ||
REFERENCES | 429 | ||
Part E | 434 | ||
Promoting MAR Systems for Water Recycling | 434 | ||
Chapter 22 | 436 | ||
Managed Aquifer Recharge as a component ofsustainable water strategies – a brief guidancefor EU policies | 436 | ||
22.1 INTRODUCTION | 436 | ||
22.1.1 Water reuse as a water stress mitigation option | 436 | ||
22.1.2 Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) | 437 | ||
22.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK | 438 | ||
22.2.1 European legislation relevant to Managed Aquifer Recharge | 439 | ||
22.2.2 Aquifer recharge specific regulations and guidelines | 443 | ||
22.3 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT APPROACHES | 447 | ||
22.3.1 Microbial risks | 447 | ||
22.3.2 Chemical risks – new substances of concern | 448 | ||
22.4 TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS | 449 | ||
22.5 RECOMMENDATIONS ON SCHEME AUTHORISATION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS | 450 | ||
22.5.1 Which investigations shall be carried out during MAR planning? | 450 | ||
22.5.2 What can be controlled and how? | 451 | ||
22.5.3 What role will MAR with reclaimed water play in the future? | 451 | ||
22.5.4 What should be done to promote the strategic adoption of MAR with reclaimed water as a water stress mitigation option? | 451 | ||
REFERENCES | 452 |