Menu Expand
Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung-hee

Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung-hee

Jung In Kang

(2017)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

This important new book identifies the distinctive characteristics of the ideological terrain in contemporary (South) Korean politics and reexamines the political thought of Park Chung-hee (1917–1979), the most revered, albeit the most controversial, former president in the history of South Korea, in light of those characteristics. Jung In Kang articulates “simultaneity of the nonsimultaneous” and the “sanctification of nationalism” as the most preeminent characteristics of the Korean ideological topography, which are distinct from those of modern Western Europe, while acknowledging the overwhelming and informing influence of modern Western civilization in shaping contemporary Korean politics and ideologies. He goes on to analyze the political thought of Park Chung-hee, in this way investigating and confirming the academic validity and relevance of those ideological characteristics in more specific terms. The book assesses how nonsimultaneity and sanctification are interwoven with Park’s thought, while reconstructing the political thought of President Park in terms of four modern ideologies: liberalism (liberal democracy), conservatism, nationalism and radicalism. Kang concludes by tracing the changes undergone by simultaneity and sanctification in the three decades since democratization, with some speculation on their future, and by examining the ideological legacy and ramifications of Park Chung-hee’s authoritarian politics in the twenty-first century.
This book is an important contribution to the fortunes of global democratization. Focusing on developments in South Korea during the past seven decades, Kang shows how Korean politics has followed and not followed the dominant Western ideologies of liberalism, conservatism, nationalism, and radicalism.The divergence has to do with the difference between early-comers and late-comers to democracy, that is, with a certain "nonsimultaneity" between Western and non-Western history. Given geopolitical asymmetries, the divergence also puts a certain premium on
nationalism and national security, thus showing the crucial embeddedness of democratization in cultural-political contexts.
Fred Dallmayr, author of Being in the World: Dialogue and Cosmopolis (2013)
A deeply thoughtful, systematic, and timely critical exploration of current South Korean political ideologies, with a particular focus on their relation to the ideas and policies of the former president Park Chung Hee, whose controversial image and legacy continues to define the political fault lines of the country even today.
Carter Eckert, Professor, Harvard University and author of 'Park Chung Hee and Modern Korea'
Jung In Kang is Professor of Political Science at Sogang University, South Korea.
"Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung-hee" by Jung In Kang is an insightful developmental analysis of Korean political thinking in a divided nation in the context of global Cold War (focusing however exclusively on the South, the Republic of Korea). Beginning with Machiavelli's famous diagnosis of bad men trying to achieve noble political ends (and vice versa), Kang shows how Korea (and Park Chung-hee in particular) overcame a "sanctified nationalism" and "simultaneity of nonsimultaneity" to complete "the tasks of modernization and democracy coevally." Yet the modality of its becoming leaves the nation divided.
Lowell Dittmer, University of California, Berkeley

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Cover Cover
Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung-hee i
Contemporary Korean Political Thought and Park Chung-hee iii
Contents vii
Author’s Note ix
Preface xi
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction xvii
NOTES1. xxvi
Part I 1
TRENDS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CONTEMPORARY KOREAN POLITICAL THOUGHT 1
Chapter 1 3
The Dynamic Evolution of Contemporary Korean Political Thought 3
CONTENDING POLITICAL FORCES AND IDEOLOGIES IN THE “LIBERATED SPACE” 6
LONG AUTHORITARIAN RULE, 1948 TO 1979: UNFOLDING AND REFRACTION OF THE FOUR IDEOLOGIESThe Rhee Syngman Regime: The First Republi 8
The Park Chung-hee Regime: The Third and Fourth Republics, 1961 to 1979The 11
THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION ERA, 1980 TO 1992: THE VICISSITUDES OF THE FOUR IDEOLOGIESThe Historical Significance of the Gwangju De 16
Political Isolation and the Decline of LiberalismDuring 17
Revolutionary Radicalism for the Liberation of the Working Class and the NationRevolutionary 19
The Debilitation of the Conservative Hegemony: Propped Up by Physical CoercionThe 20
Division-Maintaining Nationalism Declines and Unification-Oriented Nationalism RisesWith 21
IDEOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE AND NORMALIZATION IN POSTTRANSITIONAL DEMOCRACY, 1993 TO 2007Democratization of Korean PoliticsDemocrati 23
Internal Differentiation of Liberalism and Conservatism and Their Partial ConvergenceIn 25
Conversion to and Challenge from Open NationalismUnification- 28
The Acquisition of Political Citizenship for Moderate RadicalismAs 29
CONCLUDING REMARKSThus 30
NOTES1. 32
Chapter 2 35
The Dialectic of Nonsimultaneity 35
SIMULTANEITY OF THE NONSIMULTANEOUSIn 36
THE DUAL POLITICAL ORDERThe 40
CHARACTERISTICSWhen 45
Importation of Various Ideologies as Finished ProductsThe 45
Ideological Clash and Precocious “Conservatization” of Liberal DemocracyWhereas 48
Transcontextual Confrontation among IdeologiesAs 50
Authenticity ControversyIn 52
CONCLUDING REMARKSThis 56
NOTESChapter 58
Chapter 3 61
The Sanctification of Nationalism 61
OVERDETERMINATION OF OTHER IDEOLOGIES BY NATIONALISMAs 65
Conservatism and NationalismWith 66
Radicalism and NationalismRadicalism 69
Liberalism and NationalismIf 76
SummaryMy 81
OVERPOWERING PRESENCE OF ONE TASK OVER OTHERS IN NATIONALISMIn 81
Suppression of Unification-Oriented Nationalism by Division-Maintaining Nationalism before 1980Before 84
Unification-Oriented Nationalism and Its Overpowering of Nationalism since the 1980sWhereas 88
Review of Unification-Oriented NationalismDivision- 95
CONCLUDING REMARKSThus 98
NOTES1. 99
Part II 109
THE POLITICAL THOUGHT OF PARK CHUNG-HEE 109
Chapter 4 111
Discourses on Democracy 111
DUAL POLITICAL ORDER AND AUTHORITARIANISM DRESSED UP AS DEMOCRACYIn 112
KOREANIZATION OF DEMOCRACYDuring 117
Administrative DemocracyAfter 118
National DemocracyIn 121
Style DemocracyAlong 126
CONCLUDING REMARKSAs 130
NOTES1. 133
Chapter 5 137
Antiliberal Conservatism for Modernization 137
THE MEANING OF POLITICS TO PARK CHUNG-HEEIn 138
PARK CHUNG-HEE’S CONSERVATISMAs 140
Anticommunism and National SecurityMore 140
DevelopmentIn 144
for Modernization: A Contradiction in Terms? 146
CHUNG-HEE’S ANTILIBERAL THOUGHTMeeting 149
CONCLUDING REMARKSSo 155
NOTES1. 155
Chapter 6 161
Discourses on Nationalism 161
NONSIMULTANEITY AND KOREAN NATIONALISMIf 163
STATE NATIONALISM GUIDED BY AN INFALLIBLE LEADERThe 164
Historical and Personal BackgroundIn 164
Park’s Discourses on Nation and Nationalism: National Conscience and the General WillKoreans 166
Statist Discourse: The System of “Total Unity as a Whole” in Accord with the Military ModelIn 168
Indissoluble Bond of the State and Nation Led by a Supreme Leader ( 170
PARK CHUNG-HEE’S CONSERVATISM AND NATIONALISMAs 176
Anticommunism and National SecurityAnticommunism 176
Economic Development (Modernization) 178
PARK CHUNG-HEE’S DISCOURSES ON UNIFICATION AND NATIONALISMRegardless 180
CONCLUDING REMARKSThus 182
NOTES1. 184
Part III 191
CONTEMPORARY KOREAN POLITICAL THOUGHT SINCE DEMOCRATIZATION 191
Chapter 7 193
Conclusion 193
SIMULTANEITY OF THE NONSIMULTANEOUSIn 195
Various Aspects of the Interaction between Global and Local Historical TimeLooking 195
The Weakening of the Dialectic of Nonsimultaneity after DemocratizationAs 200
Simultaneity of the Nonsimultaneous Ever-Present in Modernity? 202
THE SANCTIFICATION OF NATIONALISM IN DECLINENationalism 203
LEGACY OF PARK CHUNG-HEE’S POLITICAL THOUGHTI 214
NOTES1. 223
References 227
ENGLISH 227
KOREAN 229
Index 243
About the Author 253