BOOK
Conflict and Sustainability in a Changing Environment
Gwendolyn Smith | Elena P. Bastidas
(2017)
Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Using a case study of the Trio indigenous peoples in Suriname, Conflict and Sustainability in a Changing Environment presents an inside view of a community facing climate change and on the path toward sustainable development. Smith and Bastidas take the reader beyond an examination of examples from the field of practice and into a thorough case study on climate change. With more than ten years of field experience, Smith and Bastidas present an in-depth, bottom-up analysis of sustainable development, including tools for practitioners, insight for academics and advice to policymakers.
“It has been quite some time since I read a book that so easily integrated the art and science of development work into a new and coherent methodology and framework. Smith and Bastidas do what few have managed to do––that is, to jump the proverbial fence and examine the views and values of an indigenous group of people and make that the starting point of a persuasive, healthy and successful development project.”
—Brian Polkinghorn, Distinguished Professor, Department of Conflict Analysis and Dispute Resolution, and Executive Director, Bosserman Center for Conflict Resolution, Salisbury University, USA
Gwendolyn Smith, executive director of the NGO Perspectives of Freedom Foundation, USA, is a scholar and practitioner in the nexus of conflict, environment and development in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Elena P. Bastidas, associate professor at the Department of Conflict Resolution Studies, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, USA, is a development practitioner in conflict analysis and resolution in Latin America and the Caribbean.
"“This accessible volume offers practical tools to help outsiders who work with indigenous communities to understand how these people’s history, values and aspirations for the future shape their view of climate change, and illustrates how conflict management approaches can engage indigenous and scientific knowledge to address climate change challenges.”
—Marianne Schmink, Professor Emerita and Distinguished Teaching Scholar, University of Florida, USA "
Local communities are now, more than ever before, experiencing environmental change. These changes draw attention to the discrepancy and conflict between their own views and the views of the initiators of development, such as governments and multilateral organizations. The main thesis of the book unfolds around the idea that under changing environmental conditions, sustainable development can only be achieved when communities can overcome the view conflict and are free to set their own goals.
Using a case study of the Trio indigenous peoples in Suriname, the book presents an “inside” view of a community on the path towards sustainable development when facing climate change. It introduces a new framework, called VIEW, to comprehensively analyze the views of the Trio community when progressing through the different stages of development. The community apparently goes through a process of judging climate change against their own values, followed by creating a meaning about it and ultimately making a decision on how to act.
This book will take the reader beyond examining a few examples from the field. It discusses the position of a researcher in community development and presents several tools and indicators to effectively work with communities. The book lays out a set of principles for researchers to engage in ethical, effective and valid research. Only with the right mindset, a researcher can look through the eyes of the community in a respectable manner and implement a truly bottom-up approach in sustainable development.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover | Cover 1 | ||
Front Matter | i | ||
Half-title | i | ||
Series information | ii | ||
Title page | iii | ||
Copyright information | iv | ||
Table of contents | v | ||
List of Illustrations | vii | ||
Preface | ix | ||
Acknowledgments | xiii | ||
Chapter 1-8 | 1 | ||
Chapter 1 Introduction: Local Communities and Sustainable Development | 1 | ||
Views of Sustainable Development | 6 | ||
From the view of the development organization | 6 | ||
Poor social organization | 8 | ||
Limited technical capacity | 9 | ||
Limited scientific capacity | 11 | ||
From the view of the indigenous communities | 11 | ||
The project is too general | 12 | ||
The project is too short | 12 | ||
The project is too narrow | 14 | ||
The project is too acultural | 15 | ||
The project is too dominant | 16 | ||
The project is too fuzzy | 17 | ||
Communities under New Pressure | 18 | ||
Science as a primary source of power | 21 | ||
Institutionalization of mitigation: REDD | 22 | ||
Contents of the Book | 25 | ||
Chapter 2 Researching Views in Community Development | 27 | ||
Researching Community Views: Existing Frameworks | 27 | ||
Researching the community through the eyes of environmentalists | 29 | ||
Vulnerability and adaptation framework | 30 | ||
Traditional ecological knowledge | 32 | ||
Researching the community through the eyes of the development specialist | 33 | ||
Sustainable livelihood framework | 35 | ||
Capability framework | 36 | ||
Researching Views through Conflict-Resolution Frameworks | 37 | ||
Characteristics of conflict frameworks | 40 | ||
Characteristic 1: Conflict frameworks have a systems approach | 40 | ||
Characteristic 2: Conflict frameworks are holistic | 40 | ||
Characteristic 3: Conflict frameworks can be context specific | 41 | ||
Characteristic 4: Conflict frameworks can address power disparities | 41 | ||
Characteristic 5: Conflict frameworks recognize each party as an actor | 42 | ||
Characteristic 6: Conflict frameworks can focus on differences rather than similarities | 42 | ||
Characteristic 7: Conflict frameworks can focus on the social-change process rather than the status quo | 42 | ||
Characteristic 8: Conflict frameworks can address hidden values | 42 | ||
Conflict as a framework for researching views | 43 | ||
Chapter 3 New Framework For Researching Views in Community Development | 47 | ||
Construction of a Community View | 47 | ||
Views under climate change | 49 | ||
The Life Story: Values, Meanings and Sustainable Decisions | 50 | ||
Values | 51 | ||
Meanings | 52 | ||
Sustainable decisions | 54 | ||
The VIEW Framework | 57 | ||
Judgment against values | 57 | ||
Selection of useful information | 58 | ||
Discourse toward sustainable development | 60 | ||
Useful tool | 60 | ||
The VIEW framework in climate-change-related development | 62 | ||
Community view lost in development paradigm | 62 | ||
Conflicting views in climate-change projects | 66 | ||
Chapter 4 Social Polygraphy: An Approach to Obtaining Information Through Mutual Learning | 67 | ||
What Is Social Polygraphy? | 67 | ||
Theoretical, Conceptual and Methodological Basis of Social Polygraphy | 68 | ||
The “How-to” of Social Polygraphy | 71 | ||
Limitations of the Social Polygraphy Approach | 80 | ||
Alternative Forms of Communication and Mutual Learning | 81 | ||
Multidisciplinary teams | 82 | ||
Enhancing partnerships | 83 | ||
Balancing the investment in social polygraphy | 84 | ||
Chapter 5 Exploring The Underlying Values | 85 | ||
The Trio Indigenous People | 85 | ||
Values Related to the Collective | 88 | ||
Togetherness | 89 | ||
Religion | 90 | ||
Values Related to Social Behavior | 92 | ||
Face | 92 | ||
Avoidance | 93 | ||
Values Related to the Environment | 95 | ||
Livelihood | 96 | ||
Threats to the land | 97 | ||
Values Related to Development | 99 | ||
Education and income | 102 | ||
Negative identity | 103 | ||
Applying the VIEW Framework | 104 | ||
Values and sustainability | 107 | ||
Chapter 6 Making Sense of the World | 109 | ||
The Trios’ Interests | 110 | ||
Indicators for seasonality | 111 | ||
Predictors | 115 | ||
Nuances in the rainy season | 116 | ||
Soil health | 119 | ||
Forest health | 119 | ||
Sensitivity to microclimate | 120 | ||
Observations in time | 121 | ||
The Rules for Survival | 124 | ||
The Strategies for Adaptation | 126 | ||
The Real Attitude | 126 | ||
Applying the VIEW Framework | 129 | ||
Meaning Making and Sustainability | 133 | ||
Chapter 7 Sustainable Decisions | 135 | ||
Conflicting Views | 135 | ||
Conflicting interests | 136 | ||
Conflicting values | 138 | ||
Conflicting strategies | 139 | ||
Conflicting attitudes | 141 | ||
Decision Making under Uncertainty | 142 | ||
Understanding the discourse | 142 | ||
First discourse, October 2012 | 143 | ||
Second discourse, January 2013 | 143 | ||
Third discourse, December 2014 | 144 | ||
Applying the VIEW Framework | 145 | ||
Chapter 8 Working with Community Views | 149 | ||
Promoting Sustainability under Uncertainty | 149 | ||
The VIEW framework | 151 | ||
Bridging Differences in Views | 152 | ||
Creating holism | 153 | ||
Creating shared goals | 153 | ||
Establishing trust and cooperation | 154 | ||
Enabling participation | 155 | ||
Designing a model | 157 | ||
Principles for Researchers and Practitioners | 159 | ||
Ethics | 160 | ||
Equality | 161 | ||
Accountability | 162 | ||
Adaptation | 164 | ||
Communication | 165 | ||
Social learning | 166 | ||
Time sensitivity | 166 | ||
A Message for Policy Makers | 168 | ||
End Matter | 171 | ||
References | 171 | ||
Index | 185 |