Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Human Insecurity is concerned with our refusal to confront the millions of avoidable deaths of women and children each year. Those missing millions are rarely the subject of conventional security studies, yet such avoidable deaths are a vital part of the notion of 'security' more broadly understood. The book argues that such deaths are caused by the man-made structures of neoliberalism and 'andrarchy' and argues that the debate on human security can be reinvigorated by looking at the unarmed, civilian role in causing the deaths of millions of innocent people; from child deaths from preventable disease to honour killings.
David Roberts claims that by facing up to this relationship between social structures and massive avoidable human suffering we can create another system less prone to global violence. This book is a powerful intervention in the debate on human security and an urgent call to face up to our responsibilities to the millions killed needlessly each year.
'David Roberts makes a powerful plea for rethinking the notion of security. In the process, he not only lays siege to the intellectual structure of 'realism' but makes the compelling empirical case that until and when the world deals with the increasingly large gap between the few haves and the many have nots, it will remain a deeply disturbed place. A book that will hopefully provoke others - possibly even policy-makers - to reassess their views on the key questions facing the international system in the early part of the 21st century.'
Michael Cox, London School of Economics and Political Science
'Roberts' work offers a careful and comprehensive re-reading of the contemporary security literature and offers us tragic, shocking, and ultimately avoidable, examples of the threats, fear and violence which affect humanity on a daily basis. As Roberts states more attention needs to be paid to 'why' such acts of violence occur on such a vast scale. This book makes an invaluable contribution to helping us answer that question.'
Pauline Eadie, University of Nottingham
'Roberts has brought organized scholarship to a field of study in global politics, which deserves much attention. The principle contribution of this book comes from the detailed and wonderful explanation of the underlying causes of human security both in the developing as well as underdeveloped nations'
'This project entails a ray of hope for change, reconstruction, and above all, for peace.'
Journal of Global Change and Governance
David Roberts is a lecturer in the School of History and International Affairs at the University of Ulster. He has previously published Power, Elitism and Democracy: Political Transition in Cambodia 1991-1999 (2000) and over thirty articles on human security; statebuilding; democratisation and Cambodia.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Contents | v | ||
Tables and figures | vi | ||
Acknowledgements | viii | ||
Abbreviations | ix | ||
ONE | Introduction | 1 | ||
TWO | Thinking about security and violence | 12 | ||
The beginning of the academic debate in the West | 13 | ||
Early alternative thinking | 13 | ||
Human security | 14 | ||
What is violence? | 17 | ||
Structural violence and structures of violence | 18 | ||
The UN Development Programme (UNDP) and human security | 23 | ||
Making a good idea work? | 25 | ||
Conclusion | 30 | ||
THREE | Global human insecurity | 31 | ||
Infanticide | 32 | ||
Avoidable deaths in children under five (U5MR) | 38 | ||
Maternal mortality | 43 | ||
Intimate murder | 46 | ||
‘Honour’ killings | 49 | ||
Dowry murder | 57 | ||
Fatal female genital mutilation (FGM) | 61 | ||
Structural femicide? | 65 | ||
Conclusion | 66 | ||
FOUR | Institutions, the U5MR, infanticide and maternal mortality | 69 | ||
Neoliberal financial institutions and global inequality | 70 | ||
Institutions, social welfare and human insecurity | 73 | ||
IFIs, the market and international social policy | 74 | ||
Institutions, maternal and under-five mortality | 77 | ||
Infanticide | 79 | ||
Institutions and infanticide | 81 | ||
Sexing institutions, gendering infanticide | 82 | ||
Conclusion | 85 | ||
FIVE | Institutions and intimate murder | 88 | ||
Intimate murder: changeable social or permanent biological origins? | 88 | ||
Relationships as possession and control environments | 92 | ||
Domestic murder | 96 | ||
Belief/‘honour’ killings | 97 | ||
Dowry murders | 99 | ||
Linking intimate murder, institutions and human insecurity | 101 | ||
Conclusion | 102 | ||
SIX | Human and realist security | 105 | ||
Human insecurity and anti-state violence | 105 | ||
Neoliberal adjustment and violent public responses | 108 | ||
Relative deprivation and direct violence | 111 | ||
State failure and direct violence | 112 | ||
Conclusion | 115 | ||
SEVEN | International institutions | 117 | ||
International Financial Institutions and human insecurity | 117 | ||
Contemporary external challenges to IFIs | 119 | ||
Institutional challenge from within | 122 | ||
Recognizing dogma and challenging intellectual legitimacy | 125 | ||
Intellectual challenge | 127 | ||
Direct Control Violence and institutional reform | 129 | ||
Institutions and change | 130 | ||
‘Are women less than men?’ | 131 | ||
Conclusion | 134 | ||
EIGHT | Andrarchy and neoliberalism | 136 | ||
Realism and structure | 136 | ||
Alternative structures | 138 | ||
Andrarchy and neoliberalism | 139 | ||
Binary global structures: the symbiosis of andrarchy and neoliberalism | 151 | ||
Andrarchy, neoliberalism and human insecurity | 152 | ||
Conclusion | 157 | ||
NINE | Global structures | 159 | ||
Critical feminist challenges | 159 | ||
Male superiority, female inferiority? Some origins of gender inequality | 163 | ||
The continuing asymmetry of gender and its meaning for human security | 166 | ||
Social constructivism as a critique of realism | 169 | ||
Conclusion | 177 | ||
TEN | Conclusion | 179 | ||
Bibliography | 186 | ||
Index | 202 |