Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Refusing to take part in war is as old as war itself. This wide-ranging and original book brings together four different bodies of knowledge to examine the practice of conscientious objection: historical and philosophical analyses of conscientious objection as a critique of compulsory military service and militarization; feminist, LGBT and queer analyses of conscientious objection as a critique of patriarchy, sexism, and heterosexism; activist and academic analyses of conscientious objection as a social movement and individual act of resistance; legal analyses of the status of conscientious objection in international and national law.
Conscientious objection is an increasingly important subject of academic and political debate in countries including the US, Israel and Turkey. This book provides a much needed introduction and tool for making sense of the history of nation-states in the 20th century and understanding the political developments of the early 21st century.
'This Turkish-oriented comparative study of conscientious objection to military service is illuminating, while exhibiting the courage of morally motivated individuals who defy coercive governments. In essence, this fine multi-authored volume challenges readers to assess the nature of good citizenship in the 21st Century.'
Richard Falk, Princeton University.
'The world’s hundreds of thousands of conscientious objectors to military labour come alive in this volume, and not simply as figures of moral conscience. They are also revealed as symptoms and powerful critiques of militarism and the diverse problems it both feeds and draws on, including nationalism, patriarchy and class inequality, and racialism.'
Catherine Lutz, Brown University.
'I wish I had had this book decades ago when I first found my way to conscientious objection and ultimately to draft resistance. It is far and away the best book I have seen on the subject. Çinar and Üsterci have conceived and assembled a remarkable and appropriately complex resource about freedom and resistance to militarism. An important book for scholars and activists alike.'
Joseph Gerson, American Friends Service Committee.
'At last a book on conscientious objection to military service from the point of view of contemporary objectors ... it expresses the critique objection poses to patriarchy and social militarization and firmly places objection in the context of struggle for social transformation.'
Howard Clark, chairperson, War Resisters' International
Özgür Heval Çinar is a lawyer. Currently he is a Ph.D. candidate and Graduate Teaching Assistant in the Law Department at the University of Essex. He has also worked at several NGOs, including the Istanbul branch of the Human Rights Association of Turkey and Human Rights Watch on a voluntary basis. He is the author of "The Effects of European Court of Human Rights' Decisions on the Turkish Legal System" as well as a number of journal articles.
Coskun Üsterci is a peace and human rights activist. Graduating from the Department of Economic and Commercial Science at the Ege University, he was a founder of the Izmir War Resisters' Association. He is currently a member of the Human Rights Association, and has been working since 1992 at the Human Rights Foundation of Turkey, where he is a board member. In addition, he runs workshops on anti-militarism, conscientious objection and non-violence.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
About the editors | i | ||
Acknowledgements | vii | ||
Preface | viii | ||
Introduction | 1 | ||
Overview | 3 | ||
Notes | 12 | ||
ONE | Conscription and resisting conscription in a militarized society | 15 | ||
1 | The militarization of society: conscription and national armies in the process of citizen creation | 17 | ||
From the Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Turkey | 19 | ||
Notes | 32 | ||
2 | Patriotism and the justification of inequality in the construction of militarism | 37 | ||
The construction of legitimizing myths | 39 | ||
Patriotism | 41 | ||
Conclusion | 43 | ||
Notes | 44 | ||
3 | Refusing to serve by other means: desertion in the late Ottoman Empire | 45 | ||
The size of the problem | 46 | ||
The reasons | 48 | ||
Notes | 51 | ||
4 | Sand in the wheels? Conscientious objection at the turn of the twenty-first century | 53 | ||
Notes | 60 | ||
5 | The morals and politics of conscientious objection, civil disobedience and anti-militarism | 61 | ||
Conscientious objection as a moral stance | 61 | ||
Civil disobedience as political action | 65 | ||
Anti-militarism as anti-systemic critique | 69 | ||
Concluding remarks | 71 | ||
Notes | 72 | ||
6 | The philosophical grounds of conscientious objection | 73 | ||
Anti-militarism and conscientious objection | 73 | ||
Anti-militarism and civilian life | 74 | ||
Anti-war/anti-violence and peace | 76 | ||
Conclusion | 77 | ||
Translator’s note | 77 | ||
TWO | Conscientious objection as a critique of patriarchy, sexism and heterosexism | 79 | ||
7 | Where are the women in military conscientious objection? Some feminist clues | 81 | ||
8 | Refusing to identify as obedient wives, sacrificing mothers and proud warriors | 88 | ||
Myth of the military nation and military service as ‘culture’ | 88 | ||
Women of the military nation | 91 | ||
Sabiha Gökçen: ‘The Dersim Operation and the gun that would protect my honour!’ | 93 | ||
From Kezban, Little Ayse and Sabiha Gökçen to women conscientious objectors | 96 | ||
‘The existence of women conscientious objectors is guaranteed to challenge established norms’ | 100 | ||
Notes | 101 | ||
9 | Conscientious objection and masculine violence | 105 | ||
Masculinity and violence | 105 | ||
Different views on the relationship between masculinity and violence | 107 | ||
Different masculinities and different forms of violence in Turkey | 108 | ||
Anti-violent men and conscientious objection | 110 | ||
10 | Rotten report and reconstructing hegemonic masculinity in Turkey | 112 | ||
‘Medical examination methods’ employed to issue rotten reports and some real-life examples\r | 113 | ||
Conclusion | 115 | ||
Notes | 116 | ||
THREE | Conscientious objection in the world: experiences and problems | 119 | ||
11 | Experiences of conscientious objection movements: South Africa, Greece and Paraguay | 121 | ||
What is conscientious objection? | 121 | ||
Challenging hegemonic masculinity | 122 | ||
Figure 11.1 Relationship between demilitarization and freedom of conscience | 123 | ||
Case studies | 124 | ||
South Africa | 124 | ||
Greece | 126 | ||
Paraguay | 127 | ||
Conclusion | 129 | ||
Notes | 129 | ||
12 | Military conscription, conscientious objection and democratic citizenship in the Americas | 131 | ||
Militias, citizen soldiers and caste armies | 132 | ||
Conscription in the United States today | 134 | ||
Conscientious objection in the United States | 137 | ||
Conscription in Mexico | 139 | ||
By way of conclusion: caste armies and democratic citizenship | 141 | ||
Notes | 142 | ||
13 | Conscientious objection in Chile | 145 | ||
14 | Conscientious objection in Spain: disobedience | 149 | ||
Note | 155 | ||
15 | Conscientious objection in Israel | 156 | ||
16 | Refusing to serve in the army for reasons of conscience in Greece | 160 | ||
The history | 160 | ||
The situation today | 163 | ||
Notes | 167 | ||
17 | Conscientious objection in Turkey | 168 | ||
Notes | 178 | ||
FOUR | Conscientious objection and law | 181 | ||
A | International law | 181 | ||
18 | A view on international implementation of the right to conscientious objection | 183 | ||
Non-armed countries and the right to conscientious objection for professional soldiers in Europe | 185 | ||
Non-armed countries or professional armies in other sample countries in the world | 187 | ||
The right to conscientious objection and alternative service | 188 | ||
Conclusion | 193 | ||
Notes | 195 | ||
19 | International standards on conscientious objection to military and alternative service | 198 | ||
The UN standards | 198 | ||
Conclusion | 202 | ||
Notes | 203 | ||
20 | European standards on conscientious objection and alternative service | 206 | ||
Notes | 210 | ||
21 | Conscientious objection in international law and the Osman Murat Ülke case | 212 | ||
Osman Murat Ülke v. Turkey | 213 | ||
The status of conscientious objection in international law | 221 | ||
Notes | 222 | ||
B | The case of Turkey | 225 | ||
22 | Conscientious objection and the Turkish constitution | 227 | ||
The assessment of the court | 227 | ||
National analysis | 229 | ||
The transformation of perception | 232 | ||
Constitutional review | 234 | ||
Suggestions | 239 | ||
Notes | 241 | ||
23 | The criminality of conscientious objection in Turkey and its consequences | 242 | ||
The source of the tension between substantive law and the conscientious objection to compulsory military service in Turkey | 243 | ||
Conscientious objectors: victims of a view that prefers ‘law’ to ‘right’ | 244 | ||
Discipline: another source of grievance | 246 | ||
Conscientious objection declarations and supporting statements | 247 | ||
Moreover … | 250 | ||
Notes | 254 | ||
Notes on contributors | 257 | ||
Index | 259 |