Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Rapid advances and new technologies in the life sciences - such as biotechnologies in health, agricultural and environmental arenas - pose a range of pressing challenges to questions of citizenship. This volume brings together for the first time authors from diverse experiences and analytical traditions, encouraging a conversation between science and technology and development studies around issues of science, citizenship and globalisation. It reflects on the nature of expertise; the framing of knowledge; processes of public engagement; and issues of rights, justice and democracy. A wide variety of pressing issues is explored, such as medical genetics, agricultural biotechnology, occupational health and HIV/AIDS. Drawing upon rich case studies from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe, Science and Citizens asks:
· Do new perspectives on science, expertise and citizenship emerge from comparing cases across different issues and settings?
· What difference does globalisation make?
· What does this tell us about approaches to risk, regulation and public participation?
· How might the notion of ‘cognitive justice‘ help to further debate and practice?
'The global scope of the case-studies, and of its theoretical and normative perspectives is particularly novel and a uniquely valuable contribution to some of the world's most pressing issues.'
Ulrich Beck, University of Munich
'This volume is a unique blend of two, hitherto separate, streams of work - science and technology studies and development studies.'
Steve Rayner, University of Oxford
'The overall admirable aim of the book, consisting of provocative and well-written essays, is to bring together modern work in science studies and disciplines devoted to investigating global and national development.'
Christopher Lawrence, UCL
'Makes a major contribution to debates about the relationship between science and society.'
Bulletin of the Food Ethics Council
'[Highlighting] the politics in science and how science has in the past been used by the establishment to consolidate its power...the book is an example of what a genuine ideological and intellectual commitment to the philosophy of participation can produce.'
Development and Change
Professor Melissa Leach is a social anthropologist and Professorial Fellow of the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.
Ian Scoones is a Professorial Fellow with the Environment Group, of which he has been team leader in the past. He came to IDS in 1995 from the International Institute of Environment and Development in London.
Professor Brian Wynne is Professor of Science Studies at the Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Furness College, Lancaster University
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Cover | Cover | ||
Contents | v | ||
Foreword by John Gaventa | vii | ||
ONE | Science and citizenship | 1 | ||
1 | Introduction: science, citizenship and globalization | 3 | ||
Science, knowledge and governance: emergent themes | 7 | ||
Performing citizenships | 12 | ||
2 | Science and citizenship in a global context | 15 | ||
Introduction | 15 | ||
Perspectives on knowledge and expertise | 16 | ||
Perspectives on citizenship and science | 21 | ||
Globalized contexts for science and citizenship | 31 | ||
Cognitive justice, science and citizenship | 36 | ||
Notes | 38 | ||
TWO | Beyond risk: defining the terrain | 39 | ||
Commentary | 41 | ||
3 | The post-normal science of safety | 43 | ||
Safety: a new element of politics and science | 43 | ||
Not ‘risk’ but ‘safety’ | 44 | ||
The methodology of safety science | 45 | ||
The trajectory of safety science | 46 | ||
Safety and the corruptions of science | 48 | ||
Safety politicizes science | 50 | ||
Safety science: a new focus for politics? | 52 | ||
4 | Are scientists irrational? Risk assessment in practical reason | 54 | ||
Introduction | 54 | ||
Technical knowledge in a sociocultural context | 55 | ||
Beyond uncertainty: rationality in practical reason | 60 | ||
Conclusion | 64 | ||
5 | Risk as globalizing ‘democratic’ discourse? Framing subjects and citizens | 66 | ||
Introduction | 66 | ||
Science, risk and public worlds: constructing representation | 69 | ||
Locating ‘risk’: some cases | 73 | ||
Scientific knowledge as policy culture: imposing public incapacity | 77 | ||
Conclusions | 80 | ||
Notes | 82 | ||
6 | Knowledge, justice and democracy | 83 | ||
The civics of the transfer of technology (TOT) | 85 | ||
A grass-roots critique of science | 87 | ||
Beyond participation: the challenge of cognitive justice | 91 | ||
In search of plural visions | 93 | ||
Notes | 93 | ||
THREE | Citizens engaging with science | 95 | ||
Commentary | 97 | ||
7 | Myriad stories: constructing expertise and citizenship in discussions of the new genetics | 101 | ||
Introduction | 101 | ||
A Myriad story | 102 | ||
Focus group methodology | 103 | ||
Myriad stories - from exemplar to pariah | 105 | ||
Discussion | 110 | ||
Note | 112 | ||
8 | AIDS, science and citizenship after apartheid | 113 | ||
Introduction: science, race and cultures of colonialism | 113 | ||
Lethal solidarities: dissident science and the cultural politics of AIDS | 116 | ||
Rhetoric, rights and relativism: a case of mixed messages and mixed genres | 120 | ||
AIDS and the limits of ‘race talk’ | 121 | ||
The Treatment Action Campaign | 122 | ||
AIDS activism and ‘globalization from below’ | 124 | ||
Flexible politics for flexible times | 125 | ||
A provisional conclusion | 127 | ||
Notes | 128 | ||
9 | Demystifying occupational and environmental health: experiences from India | 130 | ||
Introduction | 130 | ||
The origins and early work of the Occupational Health and Safety Centre | 131 | ||
Lung diseases | 133 | ||
Noise-induced hearing loss | 136 | ||
Disability assessment | 137 | ||
Chemical accidents and pollution | 138 | ||
Conclusion | 139 | ||
10 | Absentee expertise: science advice for biotechnology regulation in developing countries | 142 | ||
Introduction | 142 | ||
Science advice: a third category | 143 | ||
International efforts towards biotechnology regulation | 145 | ||
Absentee expertise | 150 | ||
Conclusion: absentee expertise as a problem | 151 | ||
Notes | 154 | ||
11 | Interrogating China’s biotechnology revolution: contesting dominant science policy cultures | 155 | ||
Introduction | 155 | ||
China’s biotechnology achievements | 157 | ||
The institutional context for biotechnology science in China | 158 | ||
Regulating biotechnology, contesting biosafety | 160 | ||
The fractious state and new forms of citizenship? Debating the biotechnology vision | 163 | ||
Notes | 165 | ||
12 | Environmental perception and political mobilization in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo | 167 | ||
Our approach | 167 | ||
Political opportunity structures | 169 | ||
Social profiles of affected people | 170 | ||
Social constructions of environmental risk | 170 | ||
Mobilizing structures | 171 | ||
The mobilizing process: actors and strategies | 173 | ||
Conclusions: comparing the dynamics of mobilization | 177 | ||
Note | 182 | ||
13 | ‘Let them eat cake’: GM foods and the democratic imagination | 183 | ||
Prologue | 183 | ||
Seeds of controversy | 184 | ||
Engineering life, engineering society | 188 | ||
Conclusion: a new politics of knowledge | 196 | ||
Notes | 197 | ||
14 | Plant biotechnology and the rights of the poor: a technographic approach | 199 | ||
A right to development? | 199 | ||
Technographic case study | 200 | ||
Implications of technographic analysis: a right to subsist | 208 | ||
Conclusion | 210 | ||
Note | 212 | ||
FOUR | Participation and the politics of engagement | 213 | ||
Commentary | 215 | ||
15 | Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power | 218 | ||
Participation and analysis in social appraisal | 218 | ||
Empowerment, quality and trust | 220 | ||
Framing, justification and power | 223 | ||
‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’ | 227 | ||
Globalization, social appraisal and technology choice | 231 | ||
16 | Geographic information systems for participation | 232 | ||
Previous use of GIS-P in developing countries | 232 | ||
Current use of GIS-P in the UK | 234 | ||
GIS-P for global science citizenship | 235 | ||
17 | Democratizing science in the UK: the case of radioactive waste management | 237 | ||
Introduction: professional networks for science and citizenship | 237 | ||
Citizen and stakeholder participation in radioactive waste policy processes | 238 | ||
Conclusions | 242 | ||
Note | 243 | ||
18 | Genetic engineering in Aotearoa, New Zealand: a case of opening up or closing down debate? | 244 | ||
Introduction | 244 | ||
‘Expert’ and ‘citizen’ participation | 245 | ||
Aftermath and reflection | 247 | ||
Note | 248 | ||
19 | Exploring food and farming futures in Zimbabwe: a citizens’ jury and scenario workshop | 249 | ||
Citizens’ juries | 250 | ||
A citizens’ jury in Zimbabwe: exploring farming and food futures | 251 | ||
Concluding comments | 254 | ||
List of contributors | 256 | ||
Bibliography | 262 | ||
Index | 287 |