Menu Expand
Worst-Case Scenario?

Worst-Case Scenario?

Doctor Stuart Price

(2011)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

In this original and provocative new book, Stuart Price identifies the existence of a practice that lies at the core of the western security regime - the worst-case scenario. This consists of the projection of a significant material threat, made by an authoritative or executive power, used to bolster the security agenda of the neo-liberal state. This in turn has altered the conduct of military and police operations, which are increasingly directed against any substantial expression of dissent. Using a wide range of official sources and case studies, from 9/11 to the Stockwell shooting, Price analyses the paramilitary, political, economic and cultural manoeuvres of the security regime as it attempts to reproduce a 'command structure' within civil society. In doing so, he demonstrates that, unlike the openly totalitarian states of the past, bureaucratic rule is favoured over charismatic leadership, and the ostentatious display of coercive authority is characterised as a temporary measure. It is, he argues, a process that must be recognised and resisted.
Stuart Price is reader in media discourse and principal lecturer in media, film and journalism at De Montfort University, UK. He is the author of 'Brute Reality' (2010), 'Discourse Power Address' (2007), and a number of other books on media and communication theory. He produced one of the few academic analyses of the Stockwell shooting, for Boehmer and Morton's 'Terror and the Postcolonial' (2010).
'Stuart Price's bracing new book alerts us to the way that the contemporary security state pervades daily life. This is both a very alarming and a very scholarly work.' Toby Miller, author of 'Makeover Nation: The United States of Reinvention' 'Insightful and engaging, Stuart Price's book provides a critical analysis of the myths and mechanisms associated with the "security regime" set up to counter terrorism.' Daya Thussu, Professor of International Communication, University of Westminster, London 'Stuart Price again brings his clever and critical eye to a consideration of so-called "emergency planning" routines, providing a vital corrective to the assumption that these practices represent a straightforward response to potential threats. Using a wide range of case-studies, he shows how the "intelligence community" attempt to create discrete loci of power which avoid democratic oversight. This book will be important reading for those of us interested in the ways in which the relationship between state and society continue to evolve, not always in progressive directions.' Karen Ross, Professor of Media and Public Communication, University of Liverpool

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
About the author\r ii
Acknowledgements vi
Introduction: Preparing for the worst? 1
Forms of authority 1
The reproduction of security 2
The scenario and established practices 4
Risk and the security regime 6
Structure of the book 8
1 | Myths of security 10
Project ARGUS: spreading the word 10
The scenario 11
‘Worst-case scenario’: communication and training 13
The narrative composition of Project ARGUS 14
The bunker mentality 17
The historical context 19
Hierarchy, governance and communication 20
An auxiliary structure 21
Military procedures: intelligence preparation operations 23
Ideological motivation? 25
Normative habituation, the command structure and hierarchical form 27
Habituation at work: or, ‘why exercise your disaster response?’ 28
Reasons to be fearful? Contingency, social control and ‘secular prophecies’ 31
The strategic apprehension of disaster: presenting the ‘worst case’ 33
The ‘scenario rehearsal’ as the exercise of privilege 34
Bureaucratic power and the neutralisation of elected authority 35
Dispensing with democracy? 37
2 | Governance, technology and the state 40
Theories of governance 40
The regulation of the social order 41
Authority, hierarchy and the state 43
Governance and the ‘reform’ agenda 44
The context of governance: power and social control 46
Technological governance 48
Governance and power: oversight, distribution and control 51
Marketisation and governance 52
The target of critique: neoliberalism or capitalism? 54
The symptom and the disease 56
The devolution of power? Governance and the ‘market state’ 58
An empirical enquiry 61
Retreats from governance: holistic governance? 62
Governance and trust 66
The governance of inequality? 67
Corporatism 68
3 | The security regime: state, governance and contingency 70
Theories of power: regime or government? 70
From the security state to the security regime 73
Regime and regimen 78
Two types of authority, or the despotism of structure 80
Using the media 84
Interdepartmental conflict 85
Democracy and security 86
Habituation and ideology 89
Power and regulation 90
The character of power: structural complicity 92
Forms of authority and internal dynamics 95
‘Commanding’ allegiance 97
4 | The scenario: imagining events 100
The scenario as a device 100
The event 102
Events and the integrity of form 104
Facticity and significance 106
The categorisation of events 108
Occurrence and predictability: the meaning of events 110
The passage of time: event as an ‘end product’ 112
The event in Deleuze and Badiou 115
Privatised interventions 118
Command and obligation 122
Practical necessity, attitude and ‘alignment’ 123
Emergency planning and the security entrepreneur 126
5 | The security event: exercise, emergency and ‘real world’ crises 128
The rehearsal of security: from exercise to event 129
Knowledge and foreknowledge 130
The core of the state? 132
‘Muslim plot to kill the Pope’ 133
The security event 134
Towards a police state? 135
Missiles in Athens, tanks at Heathrow 137
The ‘spectacle’, power and rhetoric 138
Military exercises 141
Politics, utterance and representation 143
States, authority and status 144
Olympic gold? 146
Democracy and the rhetoric of security 148
Economic globalisation as threat 151
Terrorism, language and appearances 153
6 | The mediated event 155
September 11: emergence and description 155
The absence of authority 157
Mediation, ‘visibility’ and the event 159
Principles of analysis 162
Discursive frames 162
The witness, the viewer and the ‘indivisible’ event 164
The media event 166
The media institution as ‘guilty party’ 168
The mediation of emergency 170
BBC News 24 reports: orientationduring the ‘media event’ 171
Text and event 176
From duration to category 180
The basis of mediation: categories 180
‘9/11’, Abu Ghraib and ‘affect’ 182
7 | ‘Real world’ security: neglect, incompetenceand the overproduction of force 185
The US state and Hurricane Katrina 186
The mediation of ‘terror’: Stockwell, Operation ‘Kratos’ and public security 189
Framing the event: authority and utterance 192
Surveillance and ‘shoot to kill’ 195
Surveillance and mediation 198
Entering the domain of risk: ‘tragedy’, guilt and innocence 203
Representation and meaning 207
8 | Pre-emption and perception management 212
The projection of disorder 212
The scenario, contingency and social control 214
Pre-emption and the scenario 215
Harry’s Helmand adventure: a real ‘non-event’ 217
‘Perception management’ 220
The myth of ‘decentralisation’ and the role of authority 221
Strategic communication: five sites of institutional agency 223
Beyond ideology? Forecasts versus contingency 224
‘Resilience’ as a rationale 225
Resilience and ‘leveraged hegemony’ 226
Capitalisation and power 227
‘Corporate’ address and futurity: truth claims in a story-world 229
Pride before a fall 234
The citizen at a disadvantage 236
The circulation of the ‘worst case’ 237
Conclusion: Threat and social discipline 240
Trading on uncertainty 242
Two models of the ‘security regime’ 243
From contingency to eventuality 245
Notes 248
Introduction\r 248
Chapter 1\r 248
Chapter 2 249
Chapters 3, 4 and 5 250
Chapter 6 251
Chapter 7 254
Chapter 8 259
Conclusion 259
References 261
Index 284