Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
In this original and provocative new book, Stuart Price identifies the existence of a practice that lies at the core of the western security regime - the worst-case scenario. This consists of the projection of a significant material threat, made by an authoritative or executive power, used to bolster the security agenda of the neo-liberal state. This in turn has altered the conduct of military and police operations, which are increasingly directed against any substantial expression of dissent.
Using a wide range of official sources and case studies, from 9/11 to the Stockwell shooting, Price analyses the paramilitary, political, economic and cultural manoeuvres of the security regime as it attempts to reproduce a 'command structure' within civil society.
In doing so, he demonstrates that, unlike the openly totalitarian states of the past, bureaucratic rule is favoured over charismatic leadership, and the ostentatious display of coercive authority is characterised as a temporary measure. It is, he argues, a process that must be recognised and resisted.
Stuart Price is reader in media discourse and principal lecturer in media, film and journalism at De Montfort University, UK. He is the author of 'Brute Reality' (2010), 'Discourse Power Address' (2007), and a number of other books on media and communication theory. He produced one of the few academic analyses of the Stockwell shooting, for Boehmer and Morton's 'Terror and the Postcolonial' (2010).
'Stuart Price's bracing new book alerts us to the way that the contemporary security state pervades daily life. This is both a very alarming and a very scholarly work.'
Toby Miller, author of 'Makeover Nation: The United States of Reinvention'
'Insightful and engaging, Stuart Price's book provides a critical analysis of the myths and mechanisms associated with the "security regime" set up to counter terrorism.'
Daya Thussu, Professor of International Communication, University of Westminster, London
'Stuart Price again brings his clever and critical eye to a consideration of so-called "emergency planning" routines, providing a vital corrective to the assumption that these practices represent a straightforward response to potential threats. Using a wide range of case-studies, he shows how the "intelligence community" attempt to create discrete loci of power which avoid democratic oversight. This book will be important reading for those of us interested in the ways in which the relationship between state and society continue to evolve, not always in progressive directions.'
Karen Ross, Professor of Media and Public Communication, University of Liverpool
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
About the author\r | ii | ||
Acknowledgements | vi | ||
Introduction: Preparing for the worst? | 1 | ||
Forms of authority | 1 | ||
The reproduction of security | 2 | ||
The scenario and established practices | 4 | ||
Risk and the security regime | 6 | ||
Structure of the book | 8 | ||
1 | Myths of security | 10 | ||
Project ARGUS: spreading the word | 10 | ||
The scenario | 11 | ||
‘Worst-case scenario’: communication and training | 13 | ||
The narrative composition of Project ARGUS | 14 | ||
The bunker mentality | 17 | ||
The historical context | 19 | ||
Hierarchy, governance and communication | 20 | ||
An auxiliary structure | 21 | ||
Military procedures: intelligence preparation operations | 23 | ||
Ideological motivation? | 25 | ||
Normative habituation, the command structure and hierarchical form | 27 | ||
Habituation at work: or, ‘why exercise your disaster response?’ | 28 | ||
Reasons to be fearful? Contingency, social control and ‘secular prophecies’ | 31 | ||
The strategic apprehension of disaster: presenting the ‘worst case’ | 33 | ||
The ‘scenario rehearsal’ as the exercise of privilege | 34 | ||
Bureaucratic power and the neutralisation of elected authority | 35 | ||
Dispensing with democracy? | 37 | ||
2 | Governance, technology and the state | 40 | ||
Theories of governance | 40 | ||
The regulation of the social order | 41 | ||
Authority, hierarchy and the state | 43 | ||
Governance and the ‘reform’ agenda | 44 | ||
The context of governance: power and social control | 46 | ||
Technological governance | 48 | ||
Governance and power: oversight, distribution and control | 51 | ||
Marketisation and governance | 52 | ||
The target of critique: neoliberalism or capitalism? | 54 | ||
The symptom and the disease | 56 | ||
The devolution of power? Governance and the ‘market state’ | 58 | ||
An empirical enquiry | 61 | ||
Retreats from governance: holistic governance? | 62 | ||
Governance and trust | 66 | ||
The governance of inequality? | 67 | ||
Corporatism | 68 | ||
3 | The security regime: state, governance and contingency | 70 | ||
Theories of power: regime or government? | 70 | ||
From the security state to the security regime | 73 | ||
Regime and regimen | 78 | ||
Two types of authority, or the despotism of structure | 80 | ||
Using the media | 84 | ||
Interdepartmental conflict | 85 | ||
Democracy and security | 86 | ||
Habituation and ideology | 89 | ||
Power and regulation | 90 | ||
The character of power: structural complicity | 92 | ||
Forms of authority and internal dynamics | 95 | ||
‘Commanding’ allegiance | 97 | ||
4 | The scenario: imagining events | 100 | ||
The scenario as a device | 100 | ||
The event | 102 | ||
Events and the integrity of form | 104 | ||
Facticity and significance | 106 | ||
The categorisation of events | 108 | ||
Occurrence and predictability: the meaning of events | 110 | ||
The passage of time: event as an ‘end product’ | 112 | ||
The event in Deleuze and Badiou | 115 | ||
Privatised interventions | 118 | ||
Command and obligation | 122 | ||
Practical necessity, attitude and ‘alignment’ | 123 | ||
Emergency planning and the security entrepreneur | 126 | ||
5 | The security event: exercise, emergency and ‘real world’ crises | 128 | ||
The rehearsal of security: from exercise to event | 129 | ||
Knowledge and foreknowledge | 130 | ||
The core of the state? | 132 | ||
‘Muslim plot to kill the Pope’ | 133 | ||
The security event | 134 | ||
Towards a police state? | 135 | ||
Missiles in Athens, tanks at Heathrow | 137 | ||
The ‘spectacle’, power and rhetoric | 138 | ||
Military exercises | 141 | ||
Politics, utterance and representation | 143 | ||
States, authority and status | 144 | ||
Olympic gold? | 146 | ||
Democracy and the rhetoric of security | 148 | ||
Economic globalisation as threat | 151 | ||
Terrorism, language and appearances | 153 | ||
6 | The mediated event | 155 | ||
September 11: emergence and description | 155 | ||
The absence of authority | 157 | ||
Mediation, ‘visibility’ and the event | 159 | ||
Principles of analysis | 162 | ||
Discursive frames | 162 | ||
The witness, the viewer and the ‘indivisible’ event | 164 | ||
The media event | 166 | ||
The media institution as ‘guilty party’ | 168 | ||
The mediation of emergency | 170 | ||
BBC News 24 reports: orientationduring the ‘media event’ | 171 | ||
Text and event | 176 | ||
From duration to category | 180 | ||
The basis of mediation: categories | 180 | ||
‘9/11’, Abu Ghraib and ‘affect’ | 182 | ||
7 | ‘Real world’ security: neglect, incompetenceand the overproduction of force | 185 | ||
The US state and Hurricane Katrina | 186 | ||
The mediation of ‘terror’: Stockwell, Operation ‘Kratos’ and public security | 189 | ||
Framing the event: authority and utterance | 192 | ||
Surveillance and ‘shoot to kill’ | 195 | ||
Surveillance and mediation | 198 | ||
Entering the domain of risk: ‘tragedy’, guilt and innocence | 203 | ||
Representation and meaning | 207 | ||
8 | Pre-emption and perception management | 212 | ||
The projection of disorder | 212 | ||
The scenario, contingency and social control | 214 | ||
Pre-emption and the scenario | 215 | ||
Harry’s Helmand adventure: a real ‘non-event’ | 217 | ||
‘Perception management’ | 220 | ||
The myth of ‘decentralisation’ and the role of authority | 221 | ||
Strategic communication: five sites of institutional agency | 223 | ||
Beyond ideology? Forecasts versus contingency | 224 | ||
‘Resilience’ as a rationale | 225 | ||
Resilience and ‘leveraged hegemony’ | 226 | ||
Capitalisation and power | 227 | ||
‘Corporate’ address and futurity: truth claims in a story-world | 229 | ||
Pride before a fall | 234 | ||
The citizen at a disadvantage | 236 | ||
The circulation of the ‘worst case’ | 237 | ||
Conclusion: Threat and social discipline | 240 | ||
Trading on uncertainty | 242 | ||
Two models of the ‘security regime’ | 243 | ||
From contingency to eventuality | 245 | ||
Notes | 248 | ||
Introduction\r | 248 | ||
Chapter 1\r | 248 | ||
Chapter 2 | 249 | ||
Chapters 3, 4 and 5 | 250 | ||
Chapter 6 | 251 | ||
Chapter 7 | 254 | ||
Chapter 8 | 259 | ||
Conclusion | 259 | ||
References | 261 | ||
Index | 284 |