Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
Recovering a lost world of the politics of science in Imperial Germany, Gregory B. Moynahan revisits the work of the philosopher and historian Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945) and explores his relations with the Marburg School of Hermann Cohen. “Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919” covers the epochal transformations of the natural sciences at the turn of the century, and reveals Cassirer’s view of an emergent mode of understanding based purely on relational structure which, he perceived, could be applied fruitfully to the social sciences and humanities, or human sciences, “Geisteswissenschaften.”
Moynahan relates that the result was a permanently fluid but rule-based definition of the permutation of objects and subjects, as well as knowledge and reality, within different fields of knowledge. Cassirer’s project placed the development of the sciences, “Wissenschaften,” within a wide historical and ethical ambit, and sought to establish a new definition of experience, society and modernity; this project, Cassirer argued, was pivotal to the future of Germany. On this basis, Moynahan posits that Cassirer’s early work furthered the foundation of a distinctly Central European argument for democracy, liberalism and civil rights. [NP] Moynahan defends Cassirer’s critique as formative in the origins of twentieth-century social sciences, philosophy of science and law, and he argues for its direct relevance to a generation of scholars before the Second World War (including Elias, Kelsen and Panofsky), as well as after (such as Blumenberg, Foucault and Luhmann). The only text in English to focus on the first half of the polymath Cassirer’s career, this work illuminates one of the most important – and in English, least-studied – reform movements in Imperial Germany.
“Gregory Moynahan has written an important book on a thinker whose voice we need to bring back into the conversation of critical theory. It is in Ernst Cassirer’s early works and connection with the challenging philosophy of his teacher Hermann Cohen, Moynahan demonstrates, that his relevance for contemporary debate is particularly evident. This erudite and well-argued text at once illuminates the pre–World War One reform project of the Marburg school and suggests its continued significance in Cassirer’s work.” —Drucilla Cornell, Professor of Political Science, Comparative Literature, and Women’s and Gender Studies, Rutgers University
Recovering a lost world of the politics of science in Imperial Germany, Gregory B. Moynahan approaches the life and work of the philosopher and historian Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945) from a revisionist perspective, using this framework to redefine the origins of twentieth-century critical historicism and critical theory. The only text in English to focus on the first half of the polymath Cassirer’s career and his role in the Marburg School, this volume illuminates one of the most important – and in English, least-studied – reform movements in Imperial Germany.
Gregory B. Moynahan is associate professor of history and co-director of the Science, Technology and Society Program at Bard College, New York, USA.
“The last decade has witnessed a second renaissance in the scholarship on the philosopher Ernst Cassirer. With its unusual emphasis on the often-misunderstood early phase of Cassirer’s development, Gregory Moynahan’s book is an original and stimulating contribution to the recent literature.” —Peter E. Gordon, Professor of History, Harvard University, and author of “Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos”
Journal of the History of Science Society
“The increasing interest in Cassirer makes this masterful work necessary reading. By putting Cassirer in the context of the project of the Marburg school and his relation to Leibniz, Moynahan brings out the depth and consistency in Cassirer’s political and social thought, as well as its relation to his technically demanding early philosophy. It will change the way social theorists draw on Cassirer.” —John Levi Martin, Professor of Sociology, University of Chicago
“Moynahan’s study offers deeply researched new insights on Cassirer’s philosophical development. Moynahan shows that Cassirer must be understood from the beginning of his career as an independent mind who combined deep-rootedness in Marburg neo-Kantianism with the ability to theorize and reformulate innovations in the natural sciences at the beginning of the twentieth century. Cassirer’s philosophical writings up to the end of his life were defined by the same combination. By taking careful account of Cassirer’s early work, Moynahan’s work rehabilitates Cassirer as one of most import philosophers of the last 100 years.” —Thomas Meyer, LMU Munich, and author of “Ernst Cassirer: Eine Biographie”
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919_9780857283214 | i | ||
Title | iii | ||
Copyright | iv | ||
CONTENTS | vii | ||
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS | ix | ||
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS | xiii | ||
Works by Ernst Cassirer, arranged alphabetically by abbreviation | xiii | ||
Works by Hermann Cohen, arranged alphabetically by abbreviation | xv | ||
Introduction “READING A MUTE HISTORY”: ERNST CASIRER, THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE CRISES OF MODERN GERMANY | xvii | ||
Reading a Mute History: Historicism and Cassirer’s Reception | xxiii | ||
Cassirer’s Philosophy and the “Metapolitics” of the Late Marburg School | xxviii | ||
Bibliographic Context | xxxiv | ||
Notes | xxxix | ||
Part I THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE POLITICS OF SCIENCE IN GERMANY | 1 | ||
Chapter One THE TWENTIETH-CENTURY CONFLICT OF THE FACULTIES: THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE REFORM OF THE SCIENCES | 3 | ||
The Modern Conflict of the Faculties and Cohen’s Program of Reform | 5 | ||
Cohen’s Critique of “Naïve” Science and its Distortion of Modern Philosophy | 9 | ||
Cohen’s Critique of the Sciences and Development of a “Metapolitics” | 12 | ||
Cohen’s Psychology and Aesthetics | 16 | ||
Notes | 21 | ||
Chapter Two CASSIRER AND THE MARBURG SCHOOL IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLITICAL CONTEXT OF THE KAISERREICH | 27 | ||
The Development of the Marburg Critique from F. A. Lange to Cassirer | 27 | ||
Self-Censorship and the Reception of the Marburg School | 30 | ||
The Critique of Knowledge and Mandarin Culture | 31 | ||
Cassirer as Disciple and Critic of Cohen | 33 | ||
Cassirer’s Wartime Crisis | 36 | ||
Notes | 40 | ||
Chapter Three “THE SUPREME PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE”: CASSIRER’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE TENETS OF COHEN’S INFINITESIMAL METHOD (1882) AND SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY (1902–1912) | 45 | ||
Popular Science, the Infinitesimal and the Human Sensorium in the Late Nineteenth Century: Fechner and Cohen | 47 | ||
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part One: The Paradox Calculus | 50 | ||
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Two: Calculus and the General Problem of the Determination of Particulars | 52 | ||
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Three: Calculus as a Universal Schema for Modern Natural Science and Experience | 55 | ||
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Four: The Principle of Anticipation and the Continuum | 58 | ||
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Five: The Problem of Reality | 62 | ||
Cassirer’s Transformation of Cohen’s Late Philosophy | 68 | ||
Notes | 75 | ||
Part II CRITICAL SCIENCE AND MODERNITY | 83 | ||
Chapter Four LEIBNIZ AND THE FOUNDATION OF CRITICAL SCIENCE: LEIBNIZ’S SYSTEM IN ITS SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS (1902) | 85 | ||
The Centrality of Leibniz in Cassirer’s Early Career and Thought | 86 | ||
Leibniz and Modernity | 88 | ||
Leibniz’s Philosophy as Functionalist Critique of Cartesian Substantialism | 90 | ||
A. Descartes’ cogito and Leibniz’s monads | 90 | ||
B. Space, time and form | 94 | ||
C. Descartes’ God and Leibniz’s theodicy | 97 | ||
Leibniz’s Theory of Reality | 102 | ||
Leibniz’s Perspectivalism and the Concept of the Symbol | 103 | ||
The Individual in the Context of the Human Sciences | 106 | ||
A. “The Subject of Ethics and the Concept of History” | 106 | ||
B. “Law and Society” | 108 | ||
C. “Aesthetics” | 110 | ||
D. “Theodicy” and the future of humanity | 111 | ||
Notes | 113 | ||
Chapter Five SCIENCE AND HISTORY IN CASSIRER’S SUBSTANCE AND FUNCTION (1910) | 121 | ||
Logic, the Science of Mathematics and the Transformation of the Concept of Number | 124 | ||
Series and Group | 131 | ||
The Invariant Theory of Truth and the Problem of Reality | 132 | ||
Chemistry and the Functional Definition of the Atom | 134 | ||
“The System of Relational Concepts and the Problem of Reality” | 137 | ||
Historical Transformation and Paradigm in Cassirer’s Theory of Structure | 140 | ||
The Problem of Reality in the Contemporary Philosophy of Science | 145 | ||
The Concept of the Group and Perception Revisited | 150 | ||
Notes | 152 | ||
Part III LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND LAW | 157 | ||
Chapter Six LIBERALISM AND THE CONFLICT OF FORMS: THE KNOWLEDGE PROBLEM (1906–1940) AND FREEDOM AND FORM (1916) | 159 | ||
The Knowledge Problem and the History of Form | 161 | ||
Freedom and Form as Critical History | 165 | ||
The Historical Narrative of Freedom and Form | 167 | ||
Goethe’s Philosophy of Form and Symbol | 170 | ||
The Problem of Aesthetic Freedom and Goethe’s Transformation of Kant’s Third Critique | 172 | ||
Aesthetic Freedom and Basis Phenomena (Urphänomene) | 176 | ||
Humboldtian Liberalism and the Problem of Form | 180 | ||
Notes | 188 | ||
Chapter Seven LAW AS SCIENCE AND THE “COMING-INTO-BEING” OF NATURAL RIGHT IN COHEN, CASSIRER AND KELSEN | 193 | ||
The Context of Cassirer’s Functional Definition of Law and State | 195 | ||
The Two Legal Receptions of Cassirer: Abstract “Functionalist” and Liberal Humanist | 196 | ||
A. The pure theory of law and Cassirer’s functionalism | 196 | ||
B. Humanism and the coming-into-being of natural law | 198 | ||
Cassirer’s Synthetic Position between Technocracy and the Personality of the State | 201 | ||
Notes | 206 | ||
Conclusion CRITICAL SCIENCE, THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY AND THE RIDDLE OF AN ESSAY ON MAN (1944) | 209 | ||
Notes | 217 | ||
INDEX | 221 |