Menu Expand
Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919

Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919

Gregory B. Moynahan

(2013)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

Recovering a lost world of the politics of science in Imperial Germany, Gregory B. Moynahan revisits the work of the philosopher and historian Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945) and explores his relations with the Marburg School of Hermann Cohen. “Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919” covers the epochal transformations of the natural sciences at the turn of the century, and reveals Cassirer’s view of an emergent mode of understanding based purely on relational structure which, he perceived, could be applied fruitfully to the social sciences and humanities, or human sciences, “Geisteswissenschaften.”

Moynahan relates that the result was a permanently fluid but rule-based definition of the permutation of objects and subjects, as well as knowledge and reality, within different fields of knowledge. Cassirer’s project placed the development of the sciences, “Wissenschaften,” within a wide historical and ethical ambit, and sought to establish a new definition of experience, society and modernity; this project, Cassirer argued, was pivotal to the future of Germany. On this basis, Moynahan posits that Cassirer’s early work furthered the foundation of a distinctly Central European argument for democracy, liberalism and civil rights. [NP] Moynahan defends Cassirer’s critique as formative in the origins of twentieth-century social sciences, philosophy of science and law, and he argues for its direct relevance to a generation of scholars before the Second World War (including Elias, Kelsen and Panofsky), as well as after (such as Blumenberg, Foucault and Luhmann). The only text in English to focus on the first half of the polymath Cassirer’s career, this work illuminates one of the most important – and in English, least-studied – reform movements in Imperial Germany.


“Gregory Moynahan has written an important book on a thinker whose voice we need to bring back into the conversation of critical theory. It is in Ernst Cassirer’s early works and connection with the challenging philosophy of his teacher Hermann Cohen, Moynahan demonstrates, that his relevance for contemporary debate is particularly evident. This erudite and well-argued text at once illuminates the pre–World War One reform project of the Marburg school and suggests its continued significance in Cassirer’s work.” —Drucilla Cornell, Professor of Political Science, Comparative Literature, and Women’s and Gender Studies, Rutgers University


Recovering a lost world of the politics of science in Imperial Germany, Gregory B. Moynahan approaches the life and work of the philosopher and historian Ernst Cassirer (1874–1945) from a revisionist perspective, using this framework to redefine the origins of twentieth-century critical historicism and critical theory. The only text in English to focus on the first half of the polymath Cassirer’s career and his role in the Marburg School, this volume illuminates one of the most important – and in English, least-studied – reform movements in Imperial Germany.


Gregory B. Moynahan is associate professor of history and co-director of the Science, Technology and Society Program at Bard College, New York, USA. 


“The last decade has witnessed a second renaissance in the scholarship on the philosopher Ernst Cassirer. With its unusual emphasis on the often-misunderstood early phase of Cassirer’s development, Gregory Moynahan’s book is an original and stimulating contribution to the recent literature.” —Peter E. Gordon, Professor of History, Harvard University, and author of “Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos”


Journal of the History of Science Society


“The increasing interest in Cassirer makes this masterful work necessary reading. By putting Cassirer in the context of the project of the Marburg school and his relation to Leibniz, Moynahan brings out the depth and consistency in Cassirer’s political and social thought, as well as its relation to his technically demanding early philosophy. It will change the way social theorists draw on Cassirer.” —John Levi Martin, Professor of Sociology, University of Chicago


“Moynahan’s study offers deeply researched new insights on Cassirer’s philosophical development. Moynahan shows that Cassirer must be understood from the beginning of his career as an independent mind who combined deep-rootedness in Marburg neo-Kantianism with the ability to theorize and reformulate innovations in the natural sciences at the beginning of the twentieth century. Cassirer’s philosophical writings up to the end of his life were defined by the same combination. By taking careful account of Cassirer’s early work, Moynahan’s work rehabilitates Cassirer as one of most import philosophers of the last 100 years.” —Thomas Meyer, LMU Munich, and author of “Ernst Cassirer: Eine Biographie”


Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany, 1899–1919_9780857283214 i
Title iii
Copyright iv
CONTENTS vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii
Works by Ernst Cassirer, arranged alphabetically by abbreviation xiii
Works by Hermann Cohen, arranged alphabetically by abbreviation xv
Introduction “READING A MUTE HISTORY”: ERNST CASIRER, THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE CRISES OF MODERN GERMANY xvii
Reading a Mute History: Historicism and Cassirer’s Reception xxiii
Cassirer’s Philosophy and the “Metapolitics” of the Late Marburg School xxviii
Bibliographic Context xxxiv
Notes xxxix
Part I THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE POLITICS OF SCIENCE IN GERMANY 1
Chapter One THE TWENTIETH-CENTURY CONFLICT OF THE FACULTIES: THE MARBURG SCHOOL AND THE REFORM OF THE SCIENCES 3
The Modern Conflict of the Faculties and Cohen’s Program of Reform 5
Cohen’s Critique of “Naïve” Science and its Distortion of Modern Philosophy 9
Cohen’s Critique of the Sciences and Development of a “Metapolitics” 12
Cohen’s Psychology and Aesthetics 16
Notes 21
Chapter Two CASSIRER AND THE MARBURG SCHOOL IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLITICAL CONTEXT OF THE KAISERREICH 27
The Development of the Marburg Critique from F. A. Lange to Cassirer 27
Self-Censorship and the Reception of the Marburg School 30
The Critique of Knowledge and Mandarin Culture 31
Cassirer as Disciple and Critic of Cohen 33
Cassirer’s Wartime Crisis 36
Notes 40
Chapter Three “THE SUPREME PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE”: CASSIRER’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE TENETS OF COHEN’S INFINITESIMAL METHOD (1882) AND SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY (1902–1912) 45
Popular Science, the Infinitesimal and the Human Sensorium in the Late Nineteenth Century: Fechner and Cohen 47
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part One: The Paradox Calculus 50
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Two: Calculus and the General Problem of the Determination of Particulars 52
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Three: Calculus as a Universal Schema for Modern Natural Science and Experience 55
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Four: The Principle of Anticipation and the Continuum 58
Cohen’s Infinitesimal Method, Part Five: The Problem of Reality 62
Cassirer’s Transformation of Cohen’s Late Philosophy 68
Notes 75
Part II CRITICAL SCIENCE AND MODERNITY 83
Chapter Four LEIBNIZ AND THE FOUNDATION OF CRITICAL SCIENCE: LEIBNIZ’S SYSTEM IN ITS SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATIONS (1902) 85
The Centrality of Leibniz in Cassirer’s Early Career and Thought 86
Leibniz and Modernity 88
Leibniz’s Philosophy as Functionalist Critique of Cartesian Substantialism 90
A. Descartes’ cogito and Leibniz’s monads 90
B. Space, time and form 94
C. Descartes’ God and Leibniz’s theodicy 97
Leibniz’s Theory of Reality 102
Leibniz’s Perspectivalism and the Concept of the Symbol 103
The Individual in the Context of the Human Sciences 106
A. “The Subject of Ethics and the Concept of History” 106
B. “Law and Society” 108
C. “Aesthetics” 110
D. “Theodicy” and the future of humanity 111
Notes 113
Chapter Five SCIENCE AND HISTORY IN CASSIRER’S SUBSTANCE AND FUNCTION (1910) 121
Logic, the Science of Mathematics and the Transformation of the Concept of Number 124
Series and Group 131
The Invariant Theory of Truth and the Problem of Reality 132
Chemistry and the Functional Definition of the Atom 134
“The System of Relational Concepts and the Problem of Reality” 137
Historical Transformation and Paradigm in Cassirer’s Theory of Structure 140
The Problem of Reality in the Contemporary Philosophy of Science 145
The Concept of the Group and Perception Revisited 150
Notes 152
Part III LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND LAW 157
Chapter Six LIBERALISM AND THE CONFLICT OF FORMS: THE KNOWLEDGE PROBLEM (1906–1940) AND FREEDOM AND FORM (1916) 159
The Knowledge Problem and the History of Form 161
Freedom and Form as Critical History 165
The Historical Narrative of Freedom and Form 167
Goethe’s Philosophy of Form and Symbol 170
The Problem of Aesthetic Freedom and Goethe’s Transformation of Kant’s Third Critique 172
Aesthetic Freedom and Basis Phenomena (Urphänomene) 176
Humboldtian Liberalism and the Problem of Form 180
Notes 188
Chapter Seven LAW AS SCIENCE AND THE “COMING-INTO-BEING” OF NATURAL RIGHT IN COHEN, CASSIRER AND KELSEN 193
The Context of Cassirer’s Functional Definition of Law and State 195
The Two Legal Receptions of Cassirer: Abstract “Functionalist” and Liberal Humanist 196
A. The pure theory of law and Cassirer’s functionalism 196
B. Humanism and the coming-into-being of natural law 198
Cassirer’s Synthetic Position between Technocracy and the Personality of the State 201
Notes 206
Conclusion CRITICAL SCIENCE, THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY AND THE RIDDLE OF AN ESSAY ON MAN (1944) 209
Notes 217
INDEX 221