Menu Expand
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, An Issue of Urologic Clinics, E-book

Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, An Issue of Urologic Clinics, E-book

Stacy Loeb

(2014)

Additional Information

Book Details

Abstract

PSA screening remains highly controversial due to several important disadvantages. More PSA is produced with prostatic enlargement and in other benign conditions such as urinary tract infections. False positive tests can then lead to unnecessary diagnostic workup with invasive prostate biopsy. Another major problem with screening programs in general is overdiagnosis of cancers that would not have caused harm during the patient's lifetime. For example, many prostate cancers have a relatively indolent behavior so may not require diagnosis or treatment in a patient with limited life expectancy. All forms of prostate cancer treatment have potential urinary and sexual side effects, so reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment are critical public health issues. Because screening has many proven benefits but also significant harms, there are widely disparate guidelines on prostate cancer screening from major organizations worldwide. This issue of the Urologic Clinics will provide insights into the many different prostate cancer guidelines and related policy issues.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Front Cover Cover
Early Detection of\rProstate Cancer i
copyright\r ii
Contributors v
Contents vii
Urologic Clinics Of North America\r x
Foreword\r xi
Preface\r xiii
What Do the Screening Trials Really Tell Us and Where Do We Go From Here? 223
Key points 223
Introduction 223
The large randomized prostate cancer screening trials 224
The PLCO Screening Trial 224
The ERSPC Screening Trial 225
Where do we go from here? 226
References 227
Evolution and Immediate Future of US Screening Guidelines 229
Key points 229
History and evolution of guidelines 229
Prostate cancer screening guidelines 230
What issues will be addressed in the immediate future? 232
Will Screening Be Supported in the Future? 232
At What Age Should Screening Start? 232
When to Stop Screening? 232
How Often to Screen? 233
Should DRE Be Part of Initial Screening? 233
When to Biopsy? 233
Should PSA Velocity Be Used? 233
Summary 234
References 234
International Perspectives on Screening 237
Key points 237
Introduction 237
Prostate cancer and life expectancy 237
Randomized prostate cancer screening trials 238
Guidelines on prostate cancer screening 240
Screening initiatives worldwide 240
Population-Based Screening in Lithuania, the Early Prostate Cancer Detection Program 240
The Stockholm 2–3 Project 242
The Prostate Cancer Risk Management Program in the United Kingdom 243
PSA-Based Screening or Risk-Based Screening, Individual Risk Assessment for Prostate Cancer: an Impact Analysis, the Nether ... 243
PSA Mass Screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria 243
PSA-Based Screening in Asia 244
Summary 244
References 245
The Politics of Prostate Cancer Screening 249
Key points 249
The history and mission of the USPSTF 250
The USPSTF and prostate cancer screening 251
The USPSTF and breast cancer screening 252
Political next steps in the prostate cancer screening debate 253
Summary 254
References 254
Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening 257
Key points 257
Why are prostate cancer screening decisions so challenging? 258
What do prostate cancer screening guidelines say about decision making? 258
Implementation of screening guidelines 259
Shared decision making and patient decision aids 262
Summary 264
References 265
Emerging PSA-Based Tests to Improve Screening 267
Key points 267
Introduction 267
PSA-based screening for prostate cancer 267
PSA 268
Additional human kallikreins as tumor markers 269
The use of combinatorial panels of kallikrein biomarkers 270
Summary 271
References 271
The Epidemiology and Clinical Implications of Genetic Variation in Prostate Cancer 277
Key points 277
Introduction 277
Usefulness of rare genomic variation in screening for and treatment of prostate cancer 278
Usefulness of common genomic variation and screening for prostate cancer 279
Usefulness of common genomic variation to improve current serum PSA screening 283
Usefulness of common genomic variation in identifying aggressive disease 284
Usefulness of somatic markers in screening for and diagnosis of prostate cancer 286
Usefulness of differences in tumor gene expression in screening for and treatment of prostate cancer 286
Usefulness of copy-number alterations in screening for and treatment of prostate cancer 288
Usefulness of gene translocations in screening for and treatment of prostate cancer 288
Summary 289
Acknowledgments 289
References 289
Optimization of Prostate Biopsy 299
Key points 299
Optimizing prostate biopsy in clinical practice: core number and location 299
Cancer Detection Rate 299
Likelihood of Clinically Significant/Insignificant Prostate Cancer 300
Negative Predictive Value/Avoidance of Repeat Biopsy 301
Pathologic Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy 301
Influence of biopsy technique 301
Transrectal 301
End-fire versus side-fire cancer detection rates 301
Computerized templates for prostate biopsy 302
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Prostate Biopsy 303
Repeat prostate biopsy 304
Indications 304
High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical small acinar proliferation, and rising prostate-specific antigen 304
Technique 304
Focal saturation, 12-core biopsy, saturation biopsy 304
Transperineal saturation biopsy 305
MRI-targeted repeat prostate biopsy 305
Pain control 305
Technique of Anesthesia 305
Complications 306
Incidence of Prostate Biopsy Complications 306
Bleeding Complications 306
Prevention of prostate biopsy complications 306
Influence of technique 306
Management 307
Infectious Complications 307
Prevention 307
Technique 307
Management 308
Quality of Life 308
Erectile dysfunction 308
Urinary retention 308
Other 308
Summary 308
References 308
Screening and Detection Advances in Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided Prostate Biopsy 315
Key points 315
Introduction 316
Advent of MRI for diagnosis of CaP 316
Current use of MRI for diagnosis of CaP 316
mp-MRI 317
Image fusion 318
Methods of MRI-guided biopsy 318
MRI-US fusion devices 319
Value of targeted biopsy 322
Previous Negative Biopsy 322
Patient example: previous negative biopsy 324
Active surveillance 324
Patient example: active surveillance 325
Summary 325
References 325
Management of an Increasing Prostate-Specific Antigen Level After Negative Prostate Biopsy 327
Key points 327
Introduction 327
Risk of false-negative results with prostate biopsy 328
Predictors for repeat prostate biopsy 328
High-Grade PIN and ASAP 328
DRE, PSA and PSA Derivatives 328
PCA3 329
TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion 329
Cancer Field Defect Markers 330
Advanced imaging 330
Color Doppler and Power Doppler Imaging 330
Elastography 330
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging 331
Repeat biopsy technique 331
TRUS-Guided Biopsy for Repeat Biopsy 331
Role of Saturation Biopsy 331
Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy for Repeat Biopsy 332
Biopsy of MRI Lesion 334
Summary 335
References 335
When is Prostate Cancer Really Cancer? 339
Key points 339
The science of diagnosing cancer 339
The Hallmarks of Cancer 339
Metastasis Is Not a Reliable Defining Feature of Cancer 339
Invasive Features Distinguish Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia from Prostate Cancer 340
Molecular Features Distinguish Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia from Prostate Cancer 341
Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate 341
The Race to the Basement 342
Which Prostate Cancer Cells Invade and Metastasize? 342
The problem of diagnosing Gleason score 6 as cancer 342
Most Prostate Cancers are Not Life-Threatening 342
The Modern Gleason Scoring System 342
The Updated Gleason Scoring System Starts at 6 Out of 10 343
Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer 343
The problems of not diagnosing Gleason score 6 as cancer 343
Risk Associated with Downgrading Gleason 6 to a Benign Disease 344
A solution that matches the biology with the behavior 344
Summary 344
References 345
Index 347