Additional Information
Book Details
Abstract
This issue of Hematology/Oncology Clinics is focused on Hodgkin's Lymphoma and covers such topics as First HRS-cell line L428 and the detection of the CD-30 Antigen , “Normal“ CD30-B-lymphocytes, CD-30-Antigen, Combination-Chemo-Radiotherapy, Early intensification (escBEACOPP), Customized/Targeted Therapy, and more.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Front Cover | Cover | ||
Hodgkin Lymphoma\r | i | ||
Copyright\r | ii | ||
Contributors | iii | ||
Hematology/Oncology Clinics Of North America \r | viii | ||
Preface | ix | ||
First Hodgkin Cell Line L428 and the CD30 Antigen | 1 | ||
Key points | 1 | ||
Why was it essential to establish a Hodgkin cell line? | 1 | ||
The establishment of the L428 cell line | 1 | ||
Features of the L428 Hodgkin Cell Line | 2 | ||
Discovery of the CD30 antigen and its application in research, diagnostic, and therapy | 4 | ||
Detection of HRS-cell-related Antigens by Rabbit Polyclonal Antisera | 4 | ||
Detection of the Proliferation-Associated Antigen Ki-67 and the HRS-cell-Related Antigen Ki-1 | 4 | ||
Ki-1 by the monoclonal antibody approach | 4 | ||
CD30 as a Diagnostic Target: Identification of a New Lymphoma Entity and Its Detection in Formol-fixed and Paraffin-embedde ... | 4 | ||
Biosynthesis and Structure of CD30 and Shedding as a Soluble Form | 5 | ||
Derivation and Molecular Characteristics of HRS Cells | 6 | ||
Hodgkin Lymphoma Includes 2 Different Entities | 7 | ||
CD30 as a Therapeutic Target | 7 | ||
Studies with naked anti-CD30 antibodies and the first anti-CD30-drug conjugate | 7 | ||
Breakthrough in CD30-targeted antibody therapy | 8 | ||
References | 9 | ||
Advancing Antibody Drug Conjugation | 13 | ||
Key points | 13 | ||
The CD30 target antigen | 14 | ||
Development of the drug-linker component for a targeted anti-CD30 therapeutic | 15 | ||
Evaluation of brentuximab vedotin activity in vitro | 18 | ||
Evaluation of brentuximab vedotin activity in vivo | 20 | ||
Clinical experience with brentuximab vedotin | 20 | ||
References | 22 | ||
Brentuximab Vedotin for the Treatment of Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma | 27 | ||
Key points | 27 | ||
Introduction | 27 | ||
Phase I studies | 28 | ||
Pivotal phase II study | 28 | ||
Brentuximab vedotin in relapsed pretransplant and transplant-ineligible patients with Hodgkin lymphoma | 29 | ||
Experience with brentuximab vedotin in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation | 29 | ||
Brentuximab vedotin in front-line regimens | 30 | ||
Summary | 30 | ||
References | 31 | ||
Combination Chemoradiotherapy in Early Hodgkin Lymphoma | 33 | ||
Key points | 33 | ||
Introduction | 33 | ||
Decades of Successes | 33 | ||
Background | 34 | ||
Treatment | 34 | ||
RT alone is not an option | 34 | ||
SCs and Late Toxicities | 35 | ||
Evaluating the late impact of our treatments | 35 | ||
Caveats in interpreting clinical trials for localized HL | 37 | ||
Absence of Evidence is Not Always Evidence of Absence | 37 | ||
Reducing RT | 38 | ||
Trying to Reduce Side Effects | 38 | ||
Reducing the size of the RT field | 38 | ||
Dosimetric model | 38 | ||
Retrospective study | 38 | ||
Randomized trials | 38 | ||
HD8 | 38 | ||
H8-U | 39 | ||
Milan | 39 | ||
HD94 | 39 | ||
Reducing the dose of RT | 39 | ||
The HD10 trial | 39 | ||
The H9F trial | 39 | ||
CT alone | 40 | ||
The Ultimate Reduction of Radiotherapy | 40 | ||
Interim FDG-PET scan | 41 | ||
Tailoring the Treatment? | 41 | ||
Introduction | 41 | ||
Interim FDG-PET | 42 | ||
Clinical studies | 42 | ||
RAPID trial | 42 | ||
H10 trial | 43 | ||
iPET conclusion | 44 | ||
Summary | 44 | ||
Not One Size Fits All | 44 | ||
References | 44 | ||
Balancing Risks and Benefits of Therapy for Patients with Favorable-Risk Limited-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma | 49 | ||
Key points | 49 | ||
Introduction | 49 | ||
Patient population and current guidelines | 51 | ||
Components of the decision-making process | 52 | ||
Outcome Measures and Surrogates | 52 | ||
Therapy that Includes Radiation | 53 | ||
Therapy with Chemotherapy Alone | 54 | ||
The present and future | 58 | ||
References | 60 | ||
Early Intensification Treatment Approach in Advanced-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma | 65 | ||
Key points | 65 | ||
Introduction | 65 | ||
Efficacy: PFS and OS | 66 | ||
HD9 | 66 | ||
HD12 | 66 | ||
HD15 | 66 | ||
HD18 | 67 | ||
Acute and long-term toxicities | 67 | ||
Acute Toxicity | 67 | ||
Leukopenia | 67 | ||
Gonadal Toxicity | 68 | ||
Long-Term Toxicity | 68 | ||
Challenges in the treatment of older patients with intensified regimens | 69 | ||
Early or late intensification? Pros and cons | 69 | ||
References | 72 | ||
Induction Therapy for Advanced-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma | 75 | ||
Key points | 75 | ||
Introduction: nature of the problem | 75 | ||
Clinical outcomes | 77 | ||
Overall Results with ABVD Chemotherapy | 77 | ||
Results with ABVD Compared with More Dose-intense Initial Therapy | 77 | ||
Results with Subsequent Salvage Chemotherapy After Initial ABVD Chemotherapy | 79 | ||
Complications and concerns | 79 | ||
Acute Toxicity | 79 | ||
Hematologic toxicity | 79 | ||
Infection | 80 | ||
Treatment-related mortality | 80 | ||
Long-Term Toxicity | 81 | ||
Leukemia risk | 81 | ||
Infertility | 81 | ||
Stem cell injury | 82 | ||
Cardiac toxicity | 82 | ||
Pulmonary toxicity | 82 | ||
Toxicity in the elderly | 82 | ||
Summary | 83 | ||
References | 84 | ||
FDG-PET Response–adapted Therapy | 87 | ||
Key points | 87 | ||
Introduction | 87 | ||
The Hodgkin Lymphoma Therapeutic Dilemma | 87 | ||
Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in HL | 88 | ||
Early treatment monitoring with FDG-PET | 89 | ||
PET response–adapted HL therapy: early-stage disease | 90 | ||
PET response–adapted HL therapy: advanced-stage disease | 94 | ||
Completed Trials | 94 | ||
Ongoing Trials | 94 | ||
The importance of interpretation criteria | 96 | ||
Postchemotherapy FDG-PET/CT for selection of patients for consolidation radiotherapy | 96 | ||
PET/CT before high-dose salvage therapy in relapsed HL | 97 | ||
PET/CT in patients who relapsed after second-line therapy | 98 | ||
Summary | 98 | ||
References | 98 | ||
Customized Targeted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma | 105 | ||
Key points | 105 | ||
Introduction | 105 | ||
Emerging targets in the biology of HL | 106 | ||
Targeting molecules expressed on HRS cell surface | 107 | ||
Targeting CD30 | 107 | ||
Other Cell Surface Targets | 112 | ||
Targeting the tumor microenvironment | 113 | ||
Adoptive immunotherapy in HL | 114 | ||
Targeting downstream signaling and intracellular survival pathways | 115 | ||
Summary | 116 | ||
References | 117 | ||
Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma | 123 | ||
Key points | 123 | ||
Introduction | 123 | ||
Salvage therapy and HDCT/ASCT | 124 | ||
Which Prognostic Factors at Progression/Relapse Are Important? | 124 | ||
Which Salvage Regimen? | 124 | ||
Why Give HDCT and ASCT? | 126 | ||
Are There Differences Between Preparative Regimens for ASCT? | 127 | ||
Why Evaluate Response to Salvage Using FDG-PET Pre-ASCT? | 127 | ||
Can Results of ASCT Be Improved by Sequential HDCT or Tandem ASCT? | 128 | ||
SHDCT | 129 | ||
Tandem ASCT | 129 | ||
Can Results of ASCT Be Improved by Incorporating Novel Agents? | 130 | ||
What is the Prognosis for Patients Who Relapse Post-ASCT? | 130 | ||
Do we need RIC-alloSCT for RR-HL? | 131 | ||
What About Myeloablative Allogeneic SCT? | 131 | ||
What Is the Advantage of RIC-alloSCT Compared to MAC? | 131 | ||
Which Retrospective Studies of RIC-AlloSCT Are Informative? | 131 | ||
Are There Prospective Studies of RIC-alloSCT? | 134 | ||
What Prognostic Factors Before RIC-alloSCT Are Important? | 135 | ||
Does Donor Type Matter? | 135 | ||
Are Differences Between RIC-alloSCT Preparative Regimens Relevant? | 136 | ||
Is There Evidence For a GVL Effect? | 136 | ||
Are Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Effective? | 136 | ||
Can We Incorporate Alternative Strategies Into the RIC-alloSCT Approach? | 137 | ||
PET-adapted approaches | 137 | ||
Novel agents | 137 | ||
A treatment algorithm for RR-HL | 138 | ||
References | 139 | ||
Index | 149 |